There has been an endless public policy concern for preventing an act of terrorism after 9/11. Government officials feel that they ought to have seen the attack coming. Some believe that if there was some way to monitor Individuals with certain keywords, September 11th would have never happened. Though monitoring individuals on their every move was a violation of American’s freedoms, bills were passed after the attack that allowed certain government agencies to monitor individuals. Some people believe that the bills that passed to permit people monitoring were solely passed due to the intense emotions of what just happened within the world. The freedoms that Americans have are always constantly being balanced between individual freedoms and
…show more content…
I would need to trust Bayer and Fairchild (2010) who states, “the cultural embrace of an invigorated conception of privacy and also the emergence of the patients ' rights movement would ultimately set the stage for a constitutional challenge to surveillance by public health departments” (p. 906). There would be a challenge to monitor individuals for their health because people who are sick don 't need to necessarily be monitored. Individuals don 't need to be told that they don 't feel sensible. The person typically includes a good discernment to grasp if they 're feeling sick or not. I don 't think individuals ought to be monitored for the sake of public …show more content…
I believe that 's a violation of privacy that might be a significant problem for people who really aren 't happy. Those that are depressed typically don 't wish to be monitored. They want to be left alone. For them to find out that they 're being monitored would only make matters worse. On top of that, I feel it 's unethical to monitor somebody only for the reason of happiness. Individuals may claim to be happy and show happiness even when they aren 't. It’s not the duty of the government to keep a watch on people who aren 't happy. Families of those that aren 't happy ought to be doing something and ensuring those individuals are
I would need to trust Bayer and Fairchild (2010) who states, “the cultural embrace of an invigorated conception of privacy and also the emergence of the patients ' rights movement would ultimately set the stage for a constitutional challenge to surveillance by public health departments” (p. 906). There would be a challenge to monitor individuals for their health because people who are sick don 't need to necessarily be monitored. Individuals don 't need to be told that they don 't feel sensible. The person typically includes a good discernment to grasp if they 're feeling sick or not. I don 't think individuals ought to be monitored for the sake of public …show more content…
I believe that 's a violation of privacy that might be a significant problem for people who really aren 't happy. Those that are depressed typically don 't wish to be monitored. They want to be left alone. For them to find out that they 're being monitored would only make matters worse. On top of that, I feel it 's unethical to monitor somebody only for the reason of happiness. Individuals may claim to be happy and show happiness even when they aren 't. It’s not the duty of the government to keep a watch on people who aren 't happy. Families of those that aren 't happy ought to be doing something and ensuring those individuals are