Federalism In Modern Day America

Superior Essays
In today’s society, when the average-day American is asked to describe the country in one word, more likely than not, that word will be freedom. This answer is understandable. The early colonists separated and liberated themselves from King George’s tyrannical rule. Over the past approximately 240 years as a country, the United States of America has continued to show this persistence of freedom. We have certain freedoms and rights granted to us by the Constitution and states’ laws and policies. One of them is federalism which is defined as “a form of government that divides sovereign power across at least two political units” (Bianco and Canon 69). Within the realm of federalism, citizens have the availability to move to a different state …show more content…
' If you don 't support the death penalty and citizens packing a pistol - don 't come to Texas. If you don 't like medicinal marijuana and gay marriage, don 't move to California” (BrainyQuote). With this take on competitive federalism, there are many reasons why people would move to a different state because of current laws and policies in place in the residing state. For example, if a person is a devout Republican is living in a strong Democrat state then logically he would be upset about the majority of the policies being passed pleasing the Democrats of the state. Therefore, due to his political allegiance he or she can relocate to a strong Republican state. Competitive federalism has its strengths and weaknesses. Yet one disadvantage towers them all. States use competitive federalism to bring in businesses and jobs but by doing so they decrease taxes which lead to cuts in funding to major programs such as Medicaid and welfare (Bianco and Canon …show more content…
Some people may feel social and political pressures to staying where they are. For example, a person may face political pressures if he or she is a strong Democrat living in a strong Republican state, and may feel pressures to conform, become Republican, and vote for Republican policies. He or she may also be worried about being treated as an outcast from his or her peers if he or she decided to move to a strong Democrat state. Additionally, people may feel discouraged to move based on the new state’s overall opinion or discrimination on certain topics such as race and sexual orientation. According to a survey conducted by the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), 42% of LGBT youth say their community is discriminatory of their sexual orientation and very few states offer policies and laws for the LGBT community. Only 30% of states have school non-discrimination laws and policies in place and only about 60% of states have LGBT hate crime laws in effect (Human Rights Campaign). This is an excellent abstract example as to why some people may not be able to simply vote with their feet. If a LGBT citizen wanted to move to a different state with different policies but that state did not have any LGBT laws in place they might feel discriminated and most likely end up not moving to that state. In summation, competitive federalism showcases

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Have you ever thought how cool running for president would be? The only thing you would need to worry about was what political party would you be in. Back in the late 1700s presidential candidates wondered the same things, but instead of Republicans and Democrats there were Federalist and Democratic-Republicans. Both Federalist and Democratic-Republicans had similarities and differences. They both had leaders, beliefs and supporters.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Kee and Shannon (1992) offer a historical analysis to explain the changes in power and responsibility of the state/local government and the federal government. They examine the following three historical periods of federalism to understand the shifting eras of power between the fifty states and the United States capitol. 1.The 1789-1932 era: the federal government’s domestic role was limited and states were fiscally stronger and had a large degree of autonomy (Kee & Shannon, 1992).…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Federalism is a system of government in which entities such as states or provinces share power with a national government. Federalism affects day to day life in many ways such as just driving to work and /or school, as the roads are funded by the Department of Transportation. Law enforcement is another way that we are affected by federalism as we have everything from local to regional to state to federal police making our lives safer every day. These are just two examples how federalism affects us on a day-to-day…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism has a history of preserving segregation and slavery, powers are shared amongst national, provincial and state governments so gave the southern states power to form their own laws obtaining slaves. As well as, states urge to compete with each other in a hostile way. By the time, compressing the quantity of benefits they permit to people who receive welfare related to a bordering state, gripping the unnecessary mob to go to the neighboring state, so that they can decrease their welfare dues even more. This reduction of state benefits to the penniless has been called the ‘race to the bottom.’ In addition, federalism allows the inequality of the states.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The federalists wanted a strong national government because the acts of confederation failed. Federalists called for a national bank and good relations with Great Britain, this was expressed in the jay treaty in 1794. Alexander Hamilton was the leader of the federalists and backed their beliefs fully. The only federalist president was John Adams. After the jay treaty passed the federalists won most of the major legislative battles in the 1790s.…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the year 1787, there were two major different political parties that were involved in the ratification of the American Constitution. The Federalist and the Anti-Federalist; they both had very strong views regarding the welfare of the country and its citizens. The Federalist who wanted to impose a stronger government had the greatest ideas and impact on the ratification of the American’s Constitution. They didn’t want the idea of having any loose interpretation of anything, they wanted everything to be clear and done by the book, they were afraid that if anything was left up to interpretation, America would face many challenges, and would never be a whole as it is right now, and surely would lose its freedom.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1783 the English colonies had become the American colonies and were being lead by the Articles of Confederation and although the newly found freedom was much to celebrate the Articles of Confederation were not. This is because the 13 articles that composed the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses and lacked a strong central government. After the Shay’s Rebellion, a series of protests lead by American farmers’ in Massachusetts against newly enforced tax collections, in 1787 it was clear to the leaders of the Americas that a change needed to happen. In order to make these changes a completely new document needed to be placed into action. With the idea of new governing document coming into place two political parties formed, the…

    • 1371 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    States may not make treaties with other countries or with other states, issue money, levy duties on imports or exports, maintain a standing army or navy, or make war. (Paletz, Owen and Cook 86). Concurrent power, which federal and state governments share are taxing and borrowing money, regulating elections, and establishing courts. Even with this distribution between federal and state governments, the national government has multiple responsibilities to the states, they cannot deny the equal representation of any state in the Senate, state’s borders can’t altered without the consent of the state, defend any state should they request it, and guarantee each state “a republican form of government” (Paletz, Owen and Cook…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States government was created to have three equal branches, the judicial, executive, and legislative and was helped by the writing of the Constitution by James Madison. Even with these practices established, many Presidents and the government have decided and shaped United States politics by how they interpret and analyze the Constitution. Over the course of United States history all of the different political parties that arise read the Constitution in different ways and believe the meaning to certain parts of the Constitution are different. These conflicts have also caused many power struggles to arise between the President and Congress, typically when the two sides disagree and are controlled by different political parties, resulting…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Balancing Act: A look into America’s Political Structure The United States is built on the concept of federalism. Federalism is “the division of power between a central government and regional governments” (Janda 69). Federalism creates a limited government by creating a strong federal government but also granting power to the states. By allocating powers between the states and federal government, federalism prevents either of them from becoming too powerful.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From 1787-1790 the American Constitution was debated by two opposing political philosophies named the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalist were in favor of the newly formed Constitution while the Anti-Federalists objected the new constitution believing that the central government seized too much power by creating a single national government forcing the first Congress to establish a bill of rights to ensure the liberties that the Antifederalists felt the Constitution violated. The most significant topic of the debate the participation of the people in voting for ratification of the constitution. Pauline Maier in her article Take This or Nothing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, illustrates reason the constitution was ratified…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Competitive Federalism is the competition of State Governments fighting over citizens and businesses to reside in their State. This form of Federalism allows for exists for people and companies when they don’t agree with the local Politian’s. People will often vote with their feet when using competitive federalism. By offering people can exist, it could put the state at risk, but it also opens up the door for other investors, businesses, and citizens that agree with the laws. It also, allows citizens to have a larger voice over how the Government is operating at a State…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Having laws passed among all fifty states also maintains unity among the country and keeps all states on the same level as far as important regulations go. Also, each state has the equal power to bring an issue to Washington in hopes that it becomes favorable among legislators as well. In a country where discrimination has been present in more than just a few ways, federalism allows for the continuity of rules that can be guaranteed to be withheld for all people of all…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Anti-federalist correctly pointed out that the Constitution granted the federal courts an abundance of power, at the expense of the state and local courts. They wanted equal representation and supported implementing the Bill of Rights into the constitution for guaranteed protection of individual and natural rights. So when deciding to support Federalism or Anti-Federalism I choose Anti-federalism. Not only do I concur with the inclusion of the Bill of Rights and its necessity but I would have also side with them on senators and presidents being directly elected by the people.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The relationship between the State and Federal governments is complex and they are broken up into many different parts. Also the State and Federal Governments have different amounts of influence over the economy and the citizens. Another thing is that the government system and relationship between the two is very complex and controversial. This paper will discuss the relationship between the State and Federal governments and the complexity of the systems of government.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics