Federalists And The Constitution: The Interpretation Of The United States

Improved Essays
The United States government was created to have three equal branches, the judicial, executive, and legislative and was helped by the writing of the Constitution by James Madison. Even with these practices established, many Presidents and the government have decided and shaped United States politics by how they interpret and analyze the Constitution. Over the course of United States history all of the different political parties that arise read the Constitution in different ways and believe the meaning to certain parts of the Constitution are different. These conflicts have also caused many power struggles to arise between the President and Congress, typically when the two sides disagree and are controlled by different political parties, resulting …show more content…
The two early political groups of the United States, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans both had very different agendas when in came to politics and the reading of the Constitution. One of the first conflicts that arose between the Federalists and Democratic-Republican parties because of a disagreement over the interpretation of the Constitution was the First Bank of the United States. The Federalists were for the First Bank of the United States and favored a looser interpretation of the Constitution while the Democratic-Republicans opposed the First Bank of the United States because they favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution and did not believe it gave Congress the right to establish a national bank. This conflict continued through the presidency of Andrew Jackson who strongly opposed a central bank for the United States and favored people putting money in smaller, local banks (pet banks) while the Whigs opposed Andrew Jackson’s Democratic views on the central …show more content…
Andrew Johnson’s presidency was dictated completely by Congress. Andrew Johnson had disagreements with Congress over how to go about reconstruction after the Civil War which led to almost all of his vetoes being overridden and him almost being impeached, which gave all of the power in the government during Johnson’s presidency to Congress. Harry S. Truman also struggled with his powers because of Congress because of Congress’s opposition towards Truman’s ideas, because of both he House of Representative and Senate being controlled by the Republican party and Truman was a Democrat. Truman labeled this Congress the “Do Nothing Congress”, which contributed to him being reelected because it convinced the American people that the reason he was unable to accomplish much as president was because of Congress Republicans abusing the majority they held in Congress. The President of the United States has more power over the Congress in times of war. President McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, Calvin Coolidge, Truman, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Richard Nixon all sent troops into foreign nations without approval from Congress. Richard Nixon’s presidency is a time in when the executive branch held much more power than Congress. Nixon controlled the spending of the country, a right the Constitution

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of US V. Curtiss

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people tend to wonder the actual power of the president. Is it just a title? Or is he secretly the most powerful man; much like a dictator? Well, by going back in time to specific court cases that could have swayed either way, one can easily tell that the president has more powers than everyone thinks. Many think that issues involving wars and foreign relations are solely powers given to the President, but these powers can be tested when problems occur that are not clearly stated in his job description.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One major constitutional relationship that is defined deeply within the author’s argument is the distinct power of U.S foreign policy and whether or not the president or congress should have the ability to declare war (48). Ultimately when the framers constructed the constitution, it named the president the “ commander-in-chief”, however the power to declare war was only available to congress (50). Eventually this struggle among the branches led to the future outcry of who should deal with U.S foreign policy. Also over time presidents began to exert their “ commander-in-chief” duties by sending troops to where they felt necessary and even began wars only to justify that they did so with nation’s interest in mind, all without congressional approval…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    President Truman argued that the presidency had the power to act in cases of national emergency. President Truman also argued that the presidency has certain powers that are given by the Constitution. I think that the power of the commander in chief should be given the ability to take actions that were necessary to organized a war. Even though, the Supreme Court rejected his explanation, the president needed either a grant of power in the Constitution or a grant of power from Congress in which neither ever existed in this case.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The president tents to be more powerful in foreign as opposed to domestic policy on the grounds that the president is commander in chief of the armed forces, he appoints and obtains ambassadors, and because Congress acknowledges that it is not able to negotiate with other nations. With only a few exceptions, foreign policy was frequently and generally carried out by the secretary of state. As America became an enduring world power commencing with World War II, the president personally has become more profoundly involved in administrating our foreign relations. Congress plays an essential part in placing the limits of presidential actions. The Senate must affirm all ambassadorial appointments and ratify all treaties; Congress must authorize…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How has the power of the presidency changed over time? Drawing upon some historical examples, explain how presidents have acted to secure more power. What can the modern president do to overcome congressional, judicial, or bureaucratic opposition? How is a more powerful president beneficial/detrimental? Reference course readings, lectures, and examples as appropriate.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Three Branches

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Three Branches In order for the United State of America to have equal power, so that one person would not have more power over another. The Founding Fathers decided to write a constitution to divide the powers in to three branches. Each branches holds different types of responsibilities, but when they combine their powers, it will make sure the government is run smoothly and fairly, so that it is following the citizens’ rights. Each branches has an ability to keep the other two in check and that is how they would maintain balance amongst the three branches.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress itself has given the president powers that it does not constitutionally have, and the constitution is vague in some areas so the president takes advantage of the opportunity. For example, when he deploys troops to war without congressional approval because the constitution says he is the commander in chief. The role of the president has changed from weak to a strong one because he has more powers than the founding fathers intended. Institutional, cultural, and policy changes have altered the role of the Presidency because they caused the president’s power to strengthen and ultimately giving the impression that the president is the most…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Presidencies Theory

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Because the president’s requests are not always fulfilled, it may seem that the executive branch itself checks the president’s power. However, the president’s demands remain supreme in his/her branch; rebellious members of the…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Our society continuously evaluates the balancing of powers between the state government and the federal government. It is important in a democracy for the powers to be equally distributed, for if one person in the government takes total control, it would no longer be a democracy. A government with too much power isn’t a good thing, for the society itself would change. One of the main things that helps our society balance the powers between the governments are the three divisions of government. The three branches of government consist of the legislative branch, the judiciary branch, and the executive branch.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Several contemporary presidents have used their power as commander in chief to enter foreign conflicts without appealing to Congress for a formal…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Constitution is not a contract because is the supreme law of the land. Which means it was written to bring order and structure. Order is the first reason why the constitution is not a contract due to its two influences: government staying alive and the tyranny of the majority. Then the second reason why they united states constitution is not a contract because it was created to have a structure in the government. The third reason that United States Constitution is not a contract due to ratification process from the Article VII.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well before the 20th century, Congress was in charge of the federal government. Only a handful of times did the president actually make decisions or have involvement in the process. Earlier, in the formation of the United States, the president was easily considered “chief clerk”. The increased importance of foreign policy, helped to develop the presidential powers of the 20th century. Since then, the president of the United States of America has grown to become the most powerful position our nation.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Federalist Writings

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Marie Bowlin Mrs. Adams Lit 107 29 Oct 2017 “The Federalist" writings by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison The Federalist writings were written to ease the fears of the people thinking that the Government had too much power at the expense of the states. They wanted to show the American people that having a constitution was necessary. Hamilton wanted to prove in the No.10 writing that having a strong national Government would help prevent factions from taking control. The writings did work, the constitution was ratified by all the stated in May 1790. I did a little research on the Federalist party; their platform is having a small Government with a checks and balances between the Government and the states that empowers the people and protects…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate of whether the President or Congress should have more war powers has been debated for more than 200 years, and we are still not close to solving the problem. Some say that the President's authority to make war is far from absolute, though most presidents have other opinions. Several presidents, like Johnson and Bush, have made decisions alone that have affected our country in a negative way. Presidents have been known to make rash decisions disregarding Congress and send troops to war without the formal declaration of war. Congress has only declared war five times and presidents have sent troops to war more than 150 times.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the War of 1812 occurred, America experienced mainly a two-party system between the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. Both parties had completely different views concerning politics. The Federalist party was led by Alexander Hamilton who supported a stronger central government and a loose interpretation of the constitution. However, the Democratic-Republican party was led by Thomas Jefferson who supported state’s rights and a strict interpretation of the constitution. After the War of 1812, a one-party system developed due to the collapse of the Federalists party at the Hartford Convention in 1815.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays