George Will states how the election of 2004 “may be the most nation-shaping election since 1932” (Line 1-2) which was mainly due to differences in the parties’ foreign policy beliefs. This can lead the readers to believe that George Will will discuss the Republicans and Democrats contrasting beliefs on multilateralism, nation-building, preemptive war, and sovereignty. Those beliefs are vital to our country, some of most important building blocks to our government. Without having a balance in those categories, our country could be unharmonized, which could potentially cause tensions between the government and the citizens.
The reciprocity of freedom and equality can be easily envisioned when involving it in highschool regulations as a base, and then connecting it to our government. During lunch time, some schools allow their students to leave their campus, which gives them more freedom, while other mandate their students stay at school which gives them more equality. As for the government, whites were allowed more freedom such as voting and owning property compared to other races, thus creating more freedom for the whites and less equality. …show more content…
Free will that could be used to murder someone? Or free will that allows an individual to do as they please without judgement, so long that they don’t harm anything or anyone? I believe balancing both freedom and equality would be tremendously hard, because there will always be someone that doesn’t feel that they are perfectly balanced in both categories. For example, if high school students are allowed to leave campus for lunch, some students would be able to afford more expensive lunches than others. So that makes everyone less equal, but gives them more freedom. The same applies for vice versa, if students have to stay in the same lunch room, which gives less freedom, some students may still be able to afford additional-charge snacks, which still doesn’t keep the freedom and equality
The reciprocity of freedom and equality can be easily envisioned when involving it in highschool regulations as a base, and then connecting it to our government. During lunch time, some schools allow their students to leave their campus, which gives them more freedom, while other mandate their students stay at school which gives them more equality. As for the government, whites were allowed more freedom such as voting and owning property compared to other races, thus creating more freedom for the whites and less equality. …show more content…
Free will that could be used to murder someone? Or free will that allows an individual to do as they please without judgement, so long that they don’t harm anything or anyone? I believe balancing both freedom and equality would be tremendously hard, because there will always be someone that doesn’t feel that they are perfectly balanced in both categories. For example, if high school students are allowed to leave campus for lunch, some students would be able to afford more expensive lunches than others. So that makes everyone less equal, but gives them more freedom. The same applies for vice versa, if students have to stay in the same lunch room, which gives less freedom, some students may still be able to afford additional-charge snacks, which still doesn’t keep the freedom and equality