Yet, this dragon is acting in the only way it knows how. Its natural instinct is to destroy anything in its path until it finds what it is seeking. The dragon’s reaction is not unlike a child having a temper tantrum. Children will whine, cry, scream, run around, and even break things until they either get what they want or grow tired of its tantrum and accept their fate. This dragon is only having a temper tantrum. It wants its goblet back and will roar, destroy, and potentially kill until it gets it back. Others would try and say that the Geats did believe that the dragon was evil when they call it a monster. While they may say that the dragon is a monster, in the context of the poem the word monster does not mean an evil creature bent on destroying humankind. For example, Beowulf talks of how he will “…feel no shame, with shield and sword and armor, against this monster…” (2522-2523). When Beowulf talks of fighting the dragon, he does call it a monster, but not in the sense that it is evil. Instead Beowulf calls the dragon a monster in the fact that it is a strong opponent that he cannot best with his might alone. Also, some people would say that the dragon itself is an evil description. Many mythologies and religions put the image of a dragon in a dark light, and put it among the creatures of a greater evil. In this poem, the dragon is not an evil image. The dragon is shown to be a worthy opponent of Beowulf. “The beast came closer; both of them were ready, each set on slaughter” (2564-2565). If the dragon is to be shown in an evil light, then so is Beowulf for each has the same desire, to slay the foe that stands before them. Each has the same urge to kill the other so that it may continue its life. The only difference is that Beowulf also fights for his people. While his goal may be honorable, it does not make the dragon’s goal of self preservation
Yet, this dragon is acting in the only way it knows how. Its natural instinct is to destroy anything in its path until it finds what it is seeking. The dragon’s reaction is not unlike a child having a temper tantrum. Children will whine, cry, scream, run around, and even break things until they either get what they want or grow tired of its tantrum and accept their fate. This dragon is only having a temper tantrum. It wants its goblet back and will roar, destroy, and potentially kill until it gets it back. Others would try and say that the Geats did believe that the dragon was evil when they call it a monster. While they may say that the dragon is a monster, in the context of the poem the word monster does not mean an evil creature bent on destroying humankind. For example, Beowulf talks of how he will “…feel no shame, with shield and sword and armor, against this monster…” (2522-2523). When Beowulf talks of fighting the dragon, he does call it a monster, but not in the sense that it is evil. Instead Beowulf calls the dragon a monster in the fact that it is a strong opponent that he cannot best with his might alone. Also, some people would say that the dragon itself is an evil description. Many mythologies and religions put the image of a dragon in a dark light, and put it among the creatures of a greater evil. In this poem, the dragon is not an evil image. The dragon is shown to be a worthy opponent of Beowulf. “The beast came closer; both of them were ready, each set on slaughter” (2564-2565). If the dragon is to be shown in an evil light, then so is Beowulf for each has the same desire, to slay the foe that stands before them. Each has the same urge to kill the other so that it may continue its life. The only difference is that Beowulf also fights for his people. While his goal may be honorable, it does not make the dragon’s goal of self preservation