Hobbes Laws Of Nature Analysis

Improved Essays
The main concept of this essay is to analyse the main laws of nature according to Hobbes, for example; the importance of a monarch, equality and justice. The essay will then analyse the importance of the laws and, there will be evaluations made on how the laws of nature, have had an effect on Hobbes’ argument concerning political authority. In addition, the essay will also illustrate comparisons between the laws of nature and the beliefs of other scholars such as, Aristotle and Locke.
Thomas Hobbes was a firm believer in peace and claimed that peace could only be achieved through monarchy. Thus Hobbes stated in the Leviathan, “that every man, ought to endeavour peace as far as he wishes to obtain it but, when he cannot obtain it, man should
…show more content…
For example, the laws of nature had a significant importance in the eighteenth century as they were seen as an essential concept in moral philosophy. To be more specific, the laws were credited as it had an impact on the French revolution as well as the American declaration (Zagorin, 2009). Moreover, the laws of nature were also seen as portraying negativity towards pride and revenge (Zagorin, 2009). Similarly, Hobbes also received recognition for his idea of sovereignty (Strauss, 1952) as well as his idea about, the state of nature as it was described as a logical process (Macpherson, 1962). Thus, one could theorise the laws of did receive importance within political authority. Moreover, Hobbes argued that politics created a moral consensus thus, moral disagreements of the state of nature would overwhelm any attempt of creating a civil society (Tuck, 1989). Conversely, it is also important to take into consideration that, Thomas Hobbes was born during an era of war (Tuck, 1989) this may have had an effect on the way Hobbes created the laws. Hobbes was criticised for making the laws of nature solely based upon “antipathy and competition” (Macpherson, 1962). Zagorin (2009) described Hobbes as a pessimistic as, Hobbes himself states that every man is born equal, with intelligence and strength (Hobbes, 1951), yet he was only in favour for a monarchy (Zagorin, 2009). In addition, one of the most important factors is the Whigs revolution as, they established supremacy of parliament over monarchy, and this was commended by Locke (Macpherson, 1962). One could theorise that the laws of nature to a certain extent did have an impact with Hobbes argument concerning political authority but, one could personally familiarise themselves more with the ideas that Locke would

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    How does Hobbes’s view of nature shape his political theory? Political theories make suppositions about nature and/or natural laws. These boundaries (including the behaviors of the people within it) shape actions and decision-making, and the rules of nature thusly form the foundation of the ideology. It is prudent to analyze in-depth this basis for the moral and political philosophy of the great thinkers. The assumptions must make sense if the overall theory of thought built upon this foundation is to hold up.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is from this idea that Hobbes argues that the fear of death and bodily harm usher man to seek collective peace. The anarchy of the state of nature is consistent with the continual emotion of fear, fear that someone will steal your property or perhaps enslavement. To relieve this tension and enjoy life with less worry, Hobbes claims that people create a social contract between them and a ruler. According to him, people would essentially give up their power to one ruler who in turn, the ruler would ensure they could live peacefully. The only right left to the people, after they give all their power to a ruler and agree to abide by those laws, is the right to not be killed.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first law of nature is to look for peace and try to act peaceful as much as one can. Further, when one fails to find or act in peace, one should use all means of war and make sure that he or she is secured and ready to fight, in case the other person decides to strike first. The second law of nature is to let go of parts of one’s natural liberty to contract peace with others which also requires others to also let go of parts of their natural liberty, so they could have mutual commitment. Furthermore, Hobbes believes that in the state of nature, there are equal opportunities of ability and desire which creates conflict, which makes people enemies of each others. I disagree with that, I think that having equal opportunities will create peace and not conflict because people will have nothing, in terms of being equal, to fight about.…

    • 2532 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believes that without a ruler society will live in the State of Nature. This to Hobbes meant living in an almost civil war like society. Locke believed that in the state of nature people were good and honest, conflicts were resolved peacefully and justly. Locke believed that peace should be the status quo, and we can remain living this way as long as we respect each other. Hobbes believed that people can only live in peace when they turn over all rights to a sovereign.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Locke’s methods of discerning the cause of man’s desire to join a commonwealth are very similar, yet they both have dissimilar views on what the state of nature should be like and what the legitimate power would look like, but Locke’s creation of executive prerogative complicates his negative views of Hobbes’s sovereign. Though Locke disagrees often with the works of Hobbes, he does share similar qualities of both his view of legitimate political power and what the state of nature is like. In both Hobbes and Locke’s view, the legitimate authority of government comes from receiving the consent of those that want to join the commonwealth while still in the state of nature. In the state of nature, Hobbes and Locke both agree on the idea that man is an individualist, looking out only for himself.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you have an unquenchable and selfish desire for power? According to Thomas Hobbes take on human nature, you do. This view will be examined by asking; Does Hobbes’s account of why life would be so bad in the ‘state of nature’ rest on a false assumption about human nature? Who is Thomas Hobbes will be the first premise for investigation then The ‘state of nature’ as defined by Hobbes will be described then assessed.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In both Thomas Hobbes Leviathan and John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government both describe “the state of nature”. However, for both authors the view point on the “natural instincts” humans possess differs in multiple ways. For Hobbes the state of nature deals with the savagery of Americans, lead to criminal activity and involves two natural passions while Locke’s state of nature involves a state of equality. Both Hobbes and Locke’s explanation of state of nature have aspects of natural law, both authors include ideas of natural law to keep order in the society. For Hobbes the passion of reason causes individuals to look for peace and they therefore develop natural law.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Locke

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From this hypothetical, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke determined two contrasting accounts of the natural state. When analyzing their accounts on the state of nature, it appears that both philosophers agree that all men are equal, have natural liberty, and endeavor peace, however, their interpretation are acutely dissimilar. This leads to the differing accounts of the same hypothetical. Although for different reasons, both philosophers come to the common conclusion to advocate for the transition from living in the natural state to a civil society…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction ‘During and after the English Revolution (1642-88), different English thinkers reacted differently toward the revolution, based on their own life experience and philosophical outlook’. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke strongly argued distinct notions of political power. One absolute kinship, the other a democratic republic. In this essay it will firstly state and discuss the relation between state and sovereign according to Thomas Hobbes. In doing so Thomas Hobbes ideas will then be compared to John Locke’s.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Rousseau both agree how significantly society changed from the state of nature, and that implication that change had on the governments that followed. These arguments are important to note for the later implication on the purpose of the state, and how that purpose…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes advocates for extensive government power to protect people from the state of nature. He thinks that everyone is a bully. Eventually, one particular bully proves to be stronger and able to bully more than others. At this point, the other bullies follow in line with this big bully which not only strengthens this bully, but also keeps the other bullies safe from the “lead” bully so to speak. Hobbes says that that is how government is formed.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes reduces the state of nature to a list of laws based on the individual’s desire to seek peace, which would conflict with the scenario Hobbes presents. However, one could view the state of nature as an example of collective rationality prescribing individual rationality. In the end, peace may be the goal, but it can only be achieved if others are united in seeking this goal.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays