Hobbes And Martin Luther King Analysis

Superior Essays
Hobbes believes that a powerful sovereign that is not part of the social contract is the only way to govern people, be in control, and have order in the country; he thinks that because he believes that people will be so fearful of the sovereign and death that they will not cause any problems. However, James Madison, Plato, and Martin Luther King Jr. seem to for the most part disagree with him. I personally disagree with Hobbes, and I agree with Madison, Plato, and King.
Hobbes claims that Social unity and Civil peace are established through the commonwealth in the social contract. The State of Nature, in Hobbes’s opinion, is the equal opportunities of ability and desire which creates conflict, which makes people enemies of each others. He believes
…show more content…
The first law of nature is to look for peace and try to act peaceful as much as one can. Further, when one fails to find or act in peace, one should use all means of war and make sure that he or she is secured and ready to fight, in case the other person decides to strike first. The second law of nature is to let go of parts of one’s natural liberty to contract peace with others which also requires others to also let go of parts of their natural liberty, so they could have mutual commitment. Furthermore, Hobbes believes that in the state of nature, there are equal opportunities of ability and desire which creates conflict, which makes people enemies of each others. I disagree with that, I think that having equal opportunities will create peace and not conflict because people will have nothing, in terms of being equal, to fight about. People might fight just simply because they are humans but not because they are equal and have equal opportunities. Moreover, I believe that Hobbes’s first law of nature is somewhat realistic because I think that one should always be peaceful and try to solve any problem with peace. However, when the argument or problem is not solved, one should be ready to endure anything and be ready to defend one’s self. I also believe that Hobbes’s second law of nature is not impossible. People should try their best and do anything to be peaceful. Even if people had to let go for parts of their personal freedom for a long term peaceful life, I think people should do it. I agree with Hobbes and I think that once one person lets go of parts of their personal freedom, then other people will also have to let go of parts of their personal freedom to achieve and maintain peace because at the end they will both be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Locke does not hide his distrust with masses as he believes that it is much better to put the power in the hands of a small group or individual rather than the whole community. He was also of the opinion that if people are given too much freedom of choice when it comes to religion, it will only create destruction, and chaos. Thus, the magistrate should do their best to ensure peace between people and to protect public good. Naturally, they should abide to the rules themselves, be orderly and decent, and not be motivated by private interest but conversely, by the nation's good. Overstepping some boundaries to ensure the peace within the nation, is acceptable as there has to be some great, ruling power.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wherefore to seek peace, where there is any hopes of obtaining it, and where there is none, to enquire out for auxiliaries of war, is the dictate of right reason; that is, the law of nature,.” [CITIZEN] Power cannot be distributed evenly because then we would not have a society, only in nature people are equal. Though that peace should always be welcomed, Hobbes do state that war is necessary when to defend and…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli believed The Prince should not be just feared, but also loved. However, Machiavelli admits that fear works best for law and order, which is the case here. Hobbes says that a truly free person is one who goes along with the sovereign. However, Hobbes believed that all subjects of a government had the right to overthrow a government that no longer supported them. Hobbes wrote his “Laws of Nature”, which were his recommendations for guidelines for society.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus if one agrees with the condition of life in the state of nature, they would also come to the conclusion that a powerful person is needed in order to ensure peace and just civilization. It is also evident that humans in the state of nature are aggressive and selfish, creating a need for a sovereign who can lead them to peace. Hobbes states, “Where there is no common power, there is no law, no injustice” (Bailey and Martin, 181), so if there is no injustice there is no civilization. This means a powerful leader is required in order to create laws and mold what is unjust and just, allowing for peace, civilization and less chaos. Due to the conditions of the state of nature, man will consent to this power, as all human’s desire self-preservation, thus making an all powerful sovereign the proper solution.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though vengeance has to stick with justice, it gives out the reason on why human beings must act out to save others in order to keep the world at a substantial balance. Keeping these two gives out the right reasoning for keeping the two in place and not try to remove one from the other. It may seem that there shouldn’t be a need for a vengeance, as there shouldn’t be a need for evil, but in reality they both bring out the real reason on why the good will prevail by taking on the actions head…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agreeing not to kill people is a survival tactic so we can build a functioning society and improve our quality of life. All things that are “right” are because they help us in some way. An argument against moral relativism is that if nothing is right or wrong could we improve? I think we can improve, but it has nothing to do…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke believed peace is the norm, and should be the norm. We can and should live together in peace by refraining from molesting each other’s property and persons, and for the most part we do. While Hobbes believed men cannot know good and evil, and in consequence can only live in peace together by subjection to the absolute power of a common master, and therefore there can be no peace between kings. Peace between states is merely war by other means. Furthermore, the stand on the social contract is different in Locke and Hobbes’ philosophies.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical System Review

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If there is a problem going on I am not going to sugar-coat what is happening I am just going to be straight with what the right thing to do is. The reason that I believe I am this type of person is because where my family and friends are concerned I want to do what is the best things for them, along with them making the best decisions. I know that I am not always right but when I do mess up it allows me to learn how to become better and not to upset me or allow me to continue in making the same mistake. Making mistakes is a human error that is not necessarily a bad thing, errors allow us to become stronger and better as a whole. Throughout this program there has been a discussion that has come up multiple times asking if people are born good or born bad if they are to commit a crime or have bad thoughts.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    We also need to not try to be like somebody else. Being yourself helps to be a genuine person who can reflect positivity into the world. Staying true to ourselves helps us finding focus and understanding our core values and what we find important. Another mentioned point is bringing a positive attitude to every situation. Negativity only hurts us and others.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is how an individual identifies themselves as and creates a sense of belonging for that individual. If someone believed in what Hobbes explains in the Leviathan, they would accept the State of Nature to be a real scenario, rather than a hypothetical one. They too would think society should abide to a social contract to prevent “a war of every man against every man” and prohibit society from falling into civil war. A person following this ideology might believe they are classical liberalists, but it is important to understand that it is only than an extent. As mentioned before, Hobbes does carry some aspects of liberalism, but it would not be fair to label him as a true liberalists.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays