The Federalist Papers: The Irony Of Alexander Hamilton

Improved Essays
Often times when people think of early American historical figures that were against slavery, former president Abraham Lincoln is the first to come to mind. There were, of course, many before him. Alexander Hamilton “was steadfast committed to the eventual abolition of slavery” unlike many of his time. He stood his ground on his beliefs multiple times; his debates with Thomas Jefferson on the subject recorded through history. Hamilton brought light to the racial issue. He spoke out, claiming that “man’s natural rights ‘ought to be held sacred by every rational being.’” A nation that was supposedly “freed” keeping enslaved men was a prime example of irony. The nation that wanted to stray from all British rule following a law of racial slavery created by the British. By sharing his voice, Hamilton is one of the first to make the nation see the hypocrisy they were living. …show more content…
The United States Constitution that was written by Jefferson had been filled with contradictions. A new constitution was what Hamilton believed would allow the young nation to prosper. The first essay grasps the reader’s attention by telling them “you are called upon to deliberate on a new Constitution.” It placed the responsibility of creating a different union on the citizens, the very core of any nation. Hamilton is aware that not everyone shares his opinion. “My arguments will be open to all, and may be judged of by all,” he writes, allowing anyone to be free to think for themselves. This essay along with the ones following it spur the country. Many began to question the government of the time. A debate grew among the people on whether ratifying the Constitution would be necessary. Simply because Hamilton picked up his pen and wrote down an

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In their book, Washington and Hamilton: the Alliance that Forged America, authors Stephen F. Knott and Tony Williams describe how the unique and “indispensable relationship” between George Washington and Alexander Hamilton became essential to the founding of America. Knott (a professor of national security affairs at the United States Naval War College in Rhode Island) and Williams (the professional development director at the Bill of Rights Institute and program director of the Washington, Jefferson & Madison Institute in Virginia) are both historians who describe the invaluable relationship shared between George Washington and Hamilton. Their book describes how the two men of such diverse backgrounds shared similar ambitions and contemplated a like minded vision for the future of America, despite the heated controversy inflicted by their opponents. While many historians provide detailed accounts of the relationships between the founding fathers, Knott and Williams reveal several…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States of America in the Post-American Revolution was overflowing with joy, fear and cautious optimism. The world had held its breath as it watched thirteen small imperial colonies succeed in defeating the British Empire and wining its long sought after independence. Unfortunately, the defeat of Britain was only the beginning of the woes America would face. It would come down to two prominent political intellectuals of the time, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, to take it upon themselves to heed this danger. Together they sought to persuade their colleagues and the masses through secret and not so secret writings and meetings.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander Hamilton wanted strict interpretation to the Constitution, it is to be obeyed as how it was written. There could be no other possible way or bend to the rules of what the founding fathers of this country established. Thomas Jefferson however did want there to be a sort of “what if” factor to the Constitution. Jefferson believed in loose interpretation. This thinking would lead to what is called “the elastic clause” in government where in the Constitution, the rules are in set motion, but there are times when it is bended due to a certain situation where something would be considered legal although the Constitution deemed it illegal to begin.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the active form of government in America by 1777, despite not being universally ratified until 1781. During the early years following the Revolutionary War, Hamilton recognized the budding defects in current governmental structure, most notably the fact that the federal government could not wrangle the various State Legislatures to move in unison on a path to preserve the Union and protect America’s newfound liberty. Hamilton could see the writing on the wall, The Articles had created a tenuous relationship between the the States and the National governments. Hamilton’s primary criticism of the Articles was that the system did not provide the necessary amount of power for the federal government to preserve and protect the Union and its interests. The federal government lacked autonomy to take action on issues that impacted multiple states, due to the limited powers of the executive branch and propensity of legislatures to debate actions to exhaustion without taking significant action.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was born in Nevis in 1755 as an orphan. As a child, he witnessed the harshness of slavery in Nevis. He came to America to get a better education. While in America, he fought in war getting higher and higher in the ranks. He fought in multiple wars till he was asked by George washington to write his speeches for him.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With regard to the contentious attitude towards the new constitution of the United States, a Freeman’s Essay to the People of Connecticut discredits the arguments against the ratification of the new constitution and urges the readers to independently and justly judge the constitution. From the title of the document, the author is clearly pleading to the citizens, specifically of Connecticut, to disregard the eloquently formulated objections by anti-federalists against the constitution and outright denies any validity of these claims. The author’s criticism of the public’s ignorant acceptance of the opinions of influential figures serves to outline a core problem of the ratification of the constitution; the fear that the important values of…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The emotional and dramatic debates of 1787 initiated an event turning change in the structure of the United States government. The passion of James Madison’s ambition to create an equally powered federal government through the division of government branches have set foot to what the modernized American system is seen today. Rakove elaborates in great detail of the trials and errors which the delegates of the 1787 Convention had to endure. However, without the strenuous debates, contemplating opinions, and theoretical views of the Virginia Plan delegates against the New Jersey Plan delegates, the American nation would fail to stand on the strong values of equal government power. From the various attempts to create an organized federal government power and Constitution, the intentions of the delegates of the 1787 Convention were centered upon the values of theory and philosophy rather than…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ben Franklin was also a slave owner but, became opposed to the institution. In 1785, he became president of an abolitionist group in Pennsylvania. Tom Paine, was an English-American writer and political activist. He created with writing “African American Slavery in…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his Notes on the State of Virginia, Jefferson discusses religion extensively. Jefferson defines freedom as allowing citizens to express themselves without fear of government or church persecution. He firmly believed in separation of church and state. Jefferson then goes on to use his religious beliefs to show that he prefers rural life to the urban life. Jefferson writes that, “Those who labour in the earth are the chosen people of God, if ever he had a chosen people, whose breasts he has made his peculiar for substantial and genuine virtue” (165).…

    • 1008 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson, John Marshall Harlan , and Abraham Lincoln were involved in the issue addressed by by the proposal. Thomas Jefferson and other founding fathers opposed slavery but they never insisted on ending it because they were nervous to speak out on it “Jefferson and other founders who opposed slavery did not insist on abolishing it” They thought that slavery would go away by itself but that wasn’t the case. Abraham Lincoln was…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the mid-1800’s, slavery was an issue for many, even those born free. Some individuals, such as David Walker and Frederick Douglass thought the United States to be hypocritical on their views of African American freedom. Both individuals wanted their fellow citizens to see the injustice within their nation. White citizens were still being seen as superior to the black citizens and abolition was deemed necessary. Walker and Douglass addressed their concerns to the nation by saying slavery and injustice should end for good.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fifty Federalists, with the same general idea of creating a stronger central government, all got together to draw up an entirely new charter, the modern day Constitution. Many debates occurred within the forming of this document, mainly revolving around slaves and specifications regarding the executive powers. The two main opposing members regarding the executive powers was Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton wanted a single man to be elected for life for executive power. The main argument against this was if one man was in charge, the government would be far too similar to a monarchy.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda and Chernow both lack in their ability to show Hamilton's faults politically. There is no denying Hamilton is a political genius for multiple reasons, from the national bank, the establishment of the US mint, and laying out the architecture for America's economic system. His innovations still impact government systems today, and that is important to address. Hamilton was not politically perfect; he often was stuck in his ways and was unclear in his arguments. Though many of Hamilton's ideas for what American government should become did foster what our government is now, other political figures had interesting thoughts and ideas of what our government could become.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays