The Difference Between Ethical Obedience And Unjustified Demands

755 Words Mar 29th, 2016 4 Pages
Although obedience has a relatively positive connotation, it can be displeasured in situations in which certain individuals are willing to neglect any moral beliefs they have in order to fulfill what is expected of them. Stanley Milgram was an inquisitive psychologist who was bold enough to conduct what no other curious mind had- find the source that gave the sense of obligation when it came from a legitimate authority figure- even if it meant causing life threatening harm to others. The issue addressed is whether one can decipher the difference between ethical obedience and unjustifiable demands. This experiment is to benefit readers in ways that no other proven statistic can, for Milgram knew that the results would allow us to visualize what it is that evinces people to produce such tragic chaos at the snap of a superiors ' fingers. Notably, Milgram 's objective was to determine the extent an average person would willingly inflict physical pain to another at the directive of an authority figure. Moreover, Milgram 's method of coduction was intricately thought out, for his way of choosing his participants was full proof and would not alter the results. The method consisted of male participants that answered a newspaper advertisement for Yale University; the only knowledge these willing participants had was that they were to be part of a study at this notable university. The participants would then be randomly chosen to be the teacher, or learner; however, this method of…

Related Documents