Hannah Arendt's Milgram Study

Improved Essays
After conducting an experiment which tested several subjects’ abilities to resist authority, Stanley Milgram came to the conclusion that acts of evil are not conducted by sadistic humans, but obedient ones. This concept, known as the banality of evil, was introduced in Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem and can be traced to the Nuremburg Trials, in which Nazi Germans killed millions of Jews based on the orders that they were told to follow. In the experiment, subjects were told to send a series of shocks to a patient, with each shock containing increasingly more voltage. Milgram found that most subjects were willing to shock the patients despite hearing cries of agony, either because the subjects allowed responsibility to be placed on the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gabriel Trinity Professor Ryan Keith PSY2012.0T1: Gen Psyc 12 September 2014 In the summer of 1961, an associate professor of psychology named Stanley Milgrim began a research project at Yale University to investigate and quantify the willingness of average individuals to follow orders from an authoritative figure that were at odds with the participants expected moral values. These series of experiments, started in July of that year, came three months into the trial of Nazi SS-Obersturmbannführer Adolf Eichmann for his part in organizing the "Final Solution to the Jewish Question". The ability and capacity of mankinds capability to inflict pain and harm on fellow human beings was being scrutinized by the world and it is this capacity that…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experiment was designed “to see how far a person will proceed in a concrete and measurable situation in which he is ordered to inflict increasing pain on a protesting victim” (Milgram 79). Milgram discovered that many people were willing to go all the way to 450 volts when ordered by the experimenter. He concluded that the majority of people will go against their conscience if the authority shows unwavering power and determination to accomplish a…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baumrind expects that others should help one another even when facing difficult decisions. In Stanley Milgram’s article he believes that his experiment is close to why the Nazis behaved as they did, since they were under stress and an authority figure told them to do things to the Jews. Diana Baumrind believes that the experiment should not compare to the German Nazis; however she believes that the test subjects are not in as near enough stress as what the German Nazis undertook. However Stanley Milgram states “After the interview, procedures were undertaken to assure that the subject would leave the laboratory in a state of well being. “A friendly reconciliation was arranged between the subject and the victim, in an effort was made to reduce any tensions that arose as a result of the experiment" (92 Baumrind).…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Laura Topf Honors English 9 2nd hour Ms.Walters 14 March 2016 The Reason for This Madness In many situations, people do immoral things with little to no explanation. In the Milgram experiments, a subject was told to quiz another person, and shock the person if he got the answer wrong.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    The chief differentiation between his experiment and the Holocaust, she says, is the participants in the experiment displayed some form of sympathy toward the victims. However, Baumrind does not display any support to her claims; her statement would hold more validity if she would include more details and, possibly, examples of how the experiment and the Holocaust differ. Similarly, Parker refers to author Daniel Goldhagen who wrote Hitler’s Willing Executioners. In his book, Goldhagen discusses “how the crimes of the Holocaust were carried out by people obeying their own consciences, not blindly or fearfully obeying orders” (237). Parker also illustrates a theory as to why Milgram compared his experiment to the Holocaust.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fear is crucial to Mr.Ross’ experiment; it helps show the students what Nazi Germany was like. The whole purpose of the project was to give the students a taste of what the time period was like. When Mr.Ross showed his senior history class a video about the Nazis and the concentration camps; a student asked him “why didn’t anyone stop them?” This got him thinking, he didn’t know the exact answer or how to explain it. He wanted them to understand why the people who realized that what was happening was wrong, were afraid to speak up.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on the story, this college graduate is facing evident unethical authority. Because he is new to the company and his team project, he will do anything the authority asks of him so he is able to keep his job. Unfortunately, this involves some unethical phone calls and calling himself a project manager for a made-up company, the college graduate is able to land his company a significant share of the market. While he did get a bonus for his contribution, this graduate acted unethically because he wanted to obey his authority. Ultimately, the consultant justified his actions because an authority figure told him what to do.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s Experiment How far are people being able to go under pressure orders of an authority? Stanley Milgram had an interest in understanding why Germans had committed war crimes during World War 2. He planned his experiment in the early 1960’s where he had a confederate and the participant, influence of punishment on memory and experimenter orders teacher to obey. Milgram goals was to determine whether the reason many of the accused German gave to clarify their action where they believed they had to follow orders. In the Milgram’s experiment, he had included a lab-coated experiment telling the participant to administer to increase the electric shocks to test subject when they were answered wrong.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article "The Perils of Obedience” Stanley Milgram describes obedience as a basic element in the structure of social life and the effects it has on all communal living(Milgram 693). What if one is asked to be obedient to something that doesn’t aline with their personal morals? Milgram wanted to run an experiment to find this out. He simply wanted to know if the Nazis were acting out in pure evil or just simply following direct orders by a person who, they thought, was placed in a position of authority. In order to do this, he sets out to test how a normal person reacts when given violent orders by a person, who they believe are in a place of authority.…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Discussion on the Importance and Implications of Arendt’s Labour, Work, and Action As with most discussions and analyses, to best understand the text, it is important to understand the context and social milieu in which it was written. Hence, before scrutinizing the text, let us first learn a little about Hannah Arendt, the author of The Human Condition. Hannah Arendt and Her Thought Direction So who was Hannah Arendt? Hannah Arendt was born in Hanover, Germany, in 1906 as an only child and later grew up to be a political philosopher.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Theory

    • 1576 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Milgram’s (1974) empirical study of obedience is of paramount influence within experimental social psychology. Milgram (1974) was notorious for his fascination with the perils of group behaviour and blind obedience to authority, and aspired to facilitate understanding surrounding human ability to act inhumanely, without boundaries or any apparent conscience, with specific interest surrounding the horrendous acts committed during the Holocaust (Mastrioanni, 2002). Milgram’s (1974) experiment is today considered somewhat controversial and unethical and has been significant in prompting ethical considerations in future studies. However it is still considered highly relevant to contemporary social psychology, with findings demonstrating a commonality…

    • 1576 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Perplexed by the idea of how humans can brutalize others by torture, acts of humility, killing and genocide prompted Stanley Milgram, a psychologist from Yale University, to perform a study known as The Milgram Experiment in 1963. The Milgram Experiment has been deemed one of the most famous studies in psychology and is still referred to this day to answer other questions that arise involving a number of problems. Hitler’s demands of German police and soldiers to kill innocent Jews spurred Milgram to see how far people would go to hurt someone else when given an order. Thus, the Milgram Experiment began.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram’s Obedience study was an experiment one would find to be very interesting in regards to the human mind of authority. Stanley Milgram was a social psychologist whose motives was to explore American’s culture in comparison to German’s culture in obedience to commands of harming another individual. After reading about the study and watching the short film I became very sickened by the experiment. The entire thought process of the Germans to harm an individual to the point of possibly death as a result and Milgram’s idea to mimic the outrage event. This study of obedience I would have to disagree with because of the methods used on a living and breathing human being.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The common misconception is that if the average person was told to harm someone, they would disobey. The majority of people claim that when asked if they would unlawfully kill someone because they were ordered to, they wouldn’t do it. However, some studies claim that this is actually very unlikely, that most people in this situation, would rather not disappoint the authority rather than follow their own morals. Even looking back on the Holocaust it’s seen that ordinary people are capable of killing and torturing others. The Stanley Milgram Experiment explained in The Perils of Obedience, shows how common people are willing to harm another for this reason.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays