What Is The Death Penalty Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
COUNTERPOINT [Murphy] The death penalty does not always help the families achieve closure, infact, many family members of the murder victims are against the death penalty. There are many groups that are coming together to advocate for the end of the death penalty, such as Murder Victims’ Families for Reconciliation (MVFR) and the California Crime Victims for Alternatives to the Death Penalty (CCV). On the “about the CCV” page on their website, it says that “after the horrifying loss of a loved one to homicide, they are left with a clear awareness that the death penalty fails to address the needs of victims on many counts” (“Home”). They talk about how the money that they spend on actually executing someone could go to the families of the victims …show more content…
While this has some truth to it, it is not enough to murder these people. “Since 1973, for example, 150 US prisoners sent to death row have later been exonerated” (“Amnesty International”). This means that in the past 40 some years 150 people have been killed for “committing” a crime that they did not actually commit. How is this preventing crime? The government has now taken the lives of 150 innocent people. This is just as bad, if not worse than the criminal who actually commits a crime that is “death penalty worthy”. “Some of the states that most avidly execute prisoners, such as Texas and Oklahoma, have higher crime rates than states that offer only life in prison without parole” (“Saving Lives and Money”). That does not really seem like it is deterring crime. If the death penalty is all about making crime lower, why would the crime rate in the places with the most capital punishment executions have some of the highest crime rates? According to death penalty.org, since 1976, Texas has had 531 executions and Oklahoma has had 112 executions. This totals 643 people that were murdered by two states alone (“Death Penalty Info”). “According to a survey of the former and present presidents of the country’s top academic criminological societies, 88% of these experts rejected the notion that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder… Consistent with previous years, the 2014 FBI …show more content…
The quote is describing how the death penalty is an undesirable side effect of the current culture of violence that is plaguing the world. It then goes on to say that the death penalty will not fix the issue. This means that the death penalty will in no way prevent crimes from happening, it will not decrease the overcrowding in the jails, and it certainly will not fix the issues that loved ones of the victim have with closure. The death penalty is practically legalized

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This statement also leads the reader towards the point that those who have taken a life may have the potential to do it again, if we get rid of them it prevents others from endangering others later on. Sadly the article did not provide strong statistics to prove it’s point. To see if these statements are accurate I compared American states that had capital punishment to the states that did not. It turned out that in the past twenty years, the homicide rates in the states with capital punishment has been 48% to 101% higher than the states without capital punishment (Death Penalty Information Center). Also ten out of the twelve states without capital punishment had a homicide rate below the national average.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Article Summary #1: Author William Tucker uses his 2000 American Spectator article to explain why the death penalty is actually a deterrent to criminals. Tucker analyzes the statistics of crime over the years and concludes that when death penalty rates are up, murder rates are down, and when execution rates decrease, the rate of homicides rises (par. 13). While many criminologists believe that the death penalty doesn’t affect the amount of murders that take place in America, Tucker counters by saying, “The results are plain to see. Beginning at almost the exact point when executions ended, murder soared to unprecedented heights.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 2012, a man named Mark Klaas was interviewed about how he felt after the man who kidnapped and murdered his daughter, was executed. His response was that he was disappointed that it had to come to that, but satisfied that justice had been fulfilled. Mark now knows that the man that killed his twelve year-old, will never cause harm to anyone else. But what if the court had decided that it was not a "heinous" murder? Closure is what the death penalty brings to many hurting families, which is why the death penalty should be allowed in any murder cases where someone was proven guilty.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal punishment is an immensely ongoing controversial and societal issue in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world. There are thirty-one states that have kept the death penalty as a legal punishment and nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty, including New Jersey in 2007. Statistics show that 39 percent choose life without parole plus restitution, 33 percent would choose Capital Punishment, 13 percent chose life without parole, 9 percent picked life with parole, and 6 percent had no opinion. One of the main reasons people are pro death penalty is because it gives closure to the victim’s family. Defenders think that “taking an offender 's life is a more severe punishment than any prison life term.”…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proposition 62

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Despite, the disagreement it should be noted that even the opponent Hanisee admits that, “California’s death penalty is a dysfunctional mess that doesn’t bring justice to victims’ family members.” This revelation itself combats other claims that the death penalty would provide a peace of mind to families. Opponents argue that by ending the criminals minds the families will receive vengeance, and feel as if they have received justice. This is proved untrue in Scott Shafer’s article, “Prop 62 Would Abolish California’s Death Penalty” which follows the story of a women by the name Dione Wilson, and the murder of her husband. The brutal murder of her husband led her to become bitter, which in turn made her lust for revenge.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Jacoby). The death penalty is not a deterrent to crime, and it never will be, “…criminality is not a synonym for stupidity” (Jacoby.) and any criminals know when they commit crimes that if they get caught they will be punished. It doesn’t necessarily matter the punishment; the crimes will still…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty In Texas

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty does not act as a deterrent any better than other punishments. If it did, death penalty states would have lower rates of murder than non-death penalty states. This is not the case. The death penalty is hugely expensive.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    More than thirty-five hundred men and women have received the death penalty sentence in California since 1978 and not one of them has been freed, except those few inmates who were able to prove their righteousness. California could save one billion dollars over the course of five years by replacing capital punishment with a lifetime in prison. California taxpayers pay ninety thousand dollars more per inmate who is on death row each year than on inmates in prison. In 2007, New Jersey banned death penalties in the state. This makes absolute sense because we have progressed as a society through the course of the centuries.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Declaration Of Freedom

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some might argue that the death penalty can give the family of a victim of murder the closure that they…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research by Bonner and Fessenden (2000) supports that during the last 20 years, the homicide rate in states with the death penalty has been 48 percent to 101 percent higher that in states without the death penalty. That goes to show what this punishment is doing to those criminals and the actions they proceed with. “Michigan abolished the death penalty in 1846 and has resisted reinstating it,” said Governor Engler when asked about which side he chose. He also stated that 60 percent of the residents in Michigan favored the death penalty and 100 percent of those people would not want to pay the taxes on it. In addition with Michigan, Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Alaska, West Virginia, Rhode Island, Vermont, Maine, and Massachusetts are all without the death penalty (Bonner & Fessenden 2000).…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One may say that if they are violent individuals they are not going to worry about being put to death. I beg to differ; there were only six executions that were charged in 1966-1980 and the murder rate doubled from 5.6 to 10.2 per 100,000 people. In 1998 execution rates…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to article Capital punishment states, “some crimes are so heinous and inherently wrong that they demand strict penalties—up to and including life sentences or even death," (par,8). They believe that the death penalty is effective and preventive to violent crime because criminals will now think twice before committing a murder. " Recent investigations, using a variety of samples and statistical methods, consistently demonstrate a strong link between executions and reduced murder rates," (capital, par.10). They believe having the inmate sit in jail is too expensive because it cost taxpayers “$31,286” per inmate annually (capital, par…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deterrence is the only argument which death penalty advocates discuss in disputes regarding pro-death penalty. But, there is no plausible statistical evidence that the death penalty decreases the rate of murder. If capital punishment lowered homicide rates, states in America with the death penalty would have a low rating of homicide. The Death Penalty Information Centre in the USA has looked at statistics which show that American states with the death penalty have consistently higher murder rates than states without the death penalty. As of 2015, the average murder rate of death penalty states was 5.1, whilst states without the death penalty had a rate of 4.1.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Currently there are thirty one states that uses the death penalty as a means of punishment for a crime. (Facts about the Death Penalty) The death penalty is a retributivist method of punishment, and does…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics