Absolute Morality Is Culturally Relative To Culture

Improved Essays
As western culture progresses some odd concepts such as morality begin to lack definition. The death of God and globalization have opened many possibilities for the understanding and evolution of morality, particularly whether it is culturally relative or of some universal absolute (Nietzsche). By determining the root of morality as belief, and understanding that beliefs are culturally defined this essay will prove that morality is relative to culture. It will further go on to disprove any notion of absolute morality and address the issue of moral progress with a conclusion that there cannot exist moral development without domination. Therefore, it is in one’s best interest to accept the differences between cultures and do little to intervene. …show more content…
The philosopher Bertrand Russell argues that the easiest explanation is best, and until proved otherwise, should be regarded as the truth (Russell). Without proof of absolute morality existing, for that would require that all individuals share the same beliefs, the simpler explanation is that morality is constructed by culture. This is because morality is founded on belief, It is what one believes is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ that constitutes their morality, not what they have been taught. For example, I know that it is wrong to kill my parents not because I was told murder is bad, but because I believe everyone has the right to life and because I am rather fond of my parents. Culture, like morality, is also founded on the beliefs of its people. Therefore, morality is a set of guidelines one lives by in their respective culture, and no one culture shares the same moral

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The world of Pojman On behalf of Pojman and his interpretation of universal moral principles “The individual realizes his personality through his culture, hence respect for individual differences entails a respect for cultural differences” The executive board of the American Anthropological Association (69) The executive board of the American Anthropological Association proposal was meant to acknowledge moral diversity in different cultures around the world. This fragment was part of an introductory reading to the essay, “ The Case Against Ethical Relativism” by Louis Pojman. In this essay, he elaborates different arguments against ethical relativism, explains his own interpretation of universal moral principles and reconciles cultural…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ruth Benedict first seeks to demonstrate that perceptions of morality vary between cultures. Only providing one or two examples would evidently be insufficient so we are deluged with many. She dwells on this point, but it is easy enough to grant. However, after wearing us down with these examples, she unexpectedly jumps directly to her conclusion of moral relativity. Unless I am perceiving it incorrectly—which is entirely possible—this is the gist of her argument: cultures have differing views on morality; therefore, morality is relative.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This demonstrates that cultures’ moral judgment is found at many times to be wrong allowing for moral progress and the acceptance that morality does have objectively true…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good And Evil In Dracula

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    There are many morels that have happened over time from now and from back in the Victorian eras. There was different sets of morals over time based on religion and other perceptions of good and evil in literature and different forms media going back from the Victorian era till now. In the books the strange cases of Dr .Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, the hunger games, Dracula and Beowulf this are some of the literate that support the morels and how good and evil was perceive and how their actions were justified as good or evil. The thesis for this paper is that morals and perception of good and evil in society and in media try’s to justify their actions and how society at that time perceive it as good or evil set to be morally as right or wrong in their time period and how some are glorified for doing morel evils and wrongs set by other outlets of medias religion, and there society in their time. How good and evil is perceived in the book Dracula is in the form of a vampire named Dracula that is evil because of the morals of the society.it is shown in the text that…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Divine Command Theory

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A large demographic study by Pew Research Centre in 2010 found that 55% of the world 's population identified with one of the three Abrahamic religions, i.e. Judaism, Christianity, or Islam (Pew Research Center, 2012). The significance of these religions is due to the fact that they are the most popular monotheistic religions - religions who worship one god as the supreme creator or prime-mover. Among these 3.8 billion people there will of course be degrees of conviction with some believing that God is all that really matters, while others will lean more towards secular humanist views. Those that hold God above all else generally believe that God is their only guide to morality. In this essay I will discuss the main moral theories that deal…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions on Three Narratives 1. What is the difference between naysaying ethics and yeasaying ethics? Explain. What does this have to do with the story of the people of LeChambon? Naysaying ethics “forbids our doing certain harmful things”, even if that means to close the eyes to the reality and don’t do what people know it’s a right decision.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The interesting aspect of morality is how universally unbiased it is supposed to be, but yet, is still met with a debate towards what is morally correct and morally wrong. While morality is supposed to be objective, there is a subjectivity to whom those morals apply to and to whom they benefit or harm. In Chelsea Schein and Kurt Gray’s "The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm,” they discussed the evolution of morality and how difficult it is to establish a clear answer on what morality is. Schein and Gray wrote, “[one] definition of moral judgment is ‘evaluations (good vs. bad) of the actions or character of a person that are made with respect to a set of virtues held to be obligatory by a culture or subculture’ (Haidt, 2001, p. 817)” (Schein and Gray 35).…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where the beginning of Morality came from has been a huge debate among people for hundreds of years now. Morality can also be called the goodness in people or the desire to be good. Theists believe morality comes from God. Atheists believe that morality comes from our own conscience or reason. In this essay we are going to focus on proving that morality could not have come from God in view of the following reasons, 1: You can be good without God, 2: The Bible is not a clear guide for direction on morality, 3: There are many things that religious people do not agree with, and 4: The problem of evil.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Joan Didion On Morality

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Upon being asked by The American Scholar, essayist Joan Didion discusses her views of morality in her “On Morality”, where she interprets the origins of morality. Didion reasons a point that the ying yang of morality was created by humans blindly passing on their own ideas of wrong and right to others. She develops this perspective by describing anecdotes with a cool absurdity and imagery, causing readers to understand, using personal connection, how we as humans create the ideas of good and bad morality without clear definition of what either truly are. Didion introduces her essay by setting the scene; she’s in a motel room in July in Death Valley, California, trying to cool off in the 119° heat. By introducing Death Valley, she fills the reader with a negative connotation.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 4 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors examine the philosophical question whether morality depends on religion. They noted that in popular thinking, morality and religion are inseparable and that people generally accept that morality can be understood only in the framework of religion. On the other hand, from the perspective of the atheist or non religious people, the world is full of evil and in total chaos. Furthermore, the concept behind an all loving God and the ultimate rule maker of the moral code depicts the theory of Divine Command. The Divine Command Theory postulates that the question of what is morally right is commanded by God, and morally wrong is forbidden by God and draws a conclusion that the objectivity problem in ethics seems to be solved.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All the moral issues presented in this book were not wrong because the culture determined they were right. While the actions brought by imperialistic ideology, racism, and the corruption of man may have been barbaric; they were justified by cultural relativism. The normative system of relativism clearly outlined a pattern, if morality is relative, then nothing can be…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Who decides what is moral and what is not? In my opinion this way of looking at morality is no better than relativism because there 's no room for exceptions even though sometimes they need to be made in a…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in cultural relativism it is normally all the members of that certain culture who decides on what is morally acceptable. Perhaps this is why Thomas (2014) believed that, moral beliefs within a culture are true or false depending on whether they accord with the prevailing believes in that culture. However, I believe that both theories are related to a certain extent. For instance, we are all born belonging to a certain culture, community, or society.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays