Thomas Hobbes Crisis Analysis

Improved Essays
The crisis of modernity within political liberalism can be seen as a result of modern man slowly losing faith in reason and or as substantial factor to arguments that modern man will do anything he to achieve his vision of what greater human life is or can be. “As such, modern liberalism is predicted on the proposition that governments exist to maximize the liberty of their citizens to “pursue happiness,” in the words of Jefferson, or to satisfy their desires, as Hobbes would have it.” Where the crisis arises from is that “modern man no longer knows what he wants” and has lost “faith in reason’s ability to validate its highest aims” manifesting into a spiraling crisis where modern man creates an association between greater life and power. Through …show more content…
To truly understand Hobbes’ political thought process, one must understand his views on and about human nature. Human nature is “naturally driven by passion and interest, and has no incentive for altruism.” Which leads to nothing more besides distraction of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, in addition to “wars of all against all.” This lack of faith in humankind along with growing up through the entirety of the English Civil War created a prefect opportunity for modern break through in political liberalism known as Leviathan. Strongly recommended to anyone that would give him a listening hear that the only and correct way to have true political liberalism is to implement an authoritarian governmentally system. Thus, reflecting the crisis in the nature which is modern man’s ability to slowly lose faith in reason. With the ridge structure of an authoritarian government Hobbes, believes that human nature when is given “limited resources and no recognized authority” it creates a catalyst for the innate human desire allows for man’s powers to be both absolute and arbitrary.” One may be being questioning the fact that within Hobbes’ theory of political liberalism there is no liberty at all. The exact opposite is true. Liberty in the modern thought process of Hobbes is found within the state of nature, “all people possessed perfect, complete liberty.” Hobbes continues to analyze this concept of the state of nature and the formation of it in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Emma Goldman’s Anarchism: What it Really Stands For she assert that under no circumstances are we morally obligated to obey the laws of the state since they are enforced through violence and that the government should be overthrown. Emma Goldman advocates that “Anarchism: The philosophy of a new social order based on liberty unrestricted by man-made law; the theory that all forms of government rest on violence, and are therefore wrong and harmful, as well as unnecessary. ”(p. 3). In other words, Goldman believes that anarchism isn’t impractical and all forms of government are wrong and unnecessary to society.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, strongly supporting a sovereign government to control political and social order, debates the evils of man’s free…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Hobbes view, if the sovereign can easily be overthrown, then you don’t really have a sovereign. They are, in a sense, immune (something close to a dictator). For Hobbes, where there is no rule there is no justice. Without a legal system in place, there is no conception of justice. The only way to make sure our selfishness doesn’t get out of control is an absolute…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are his viewpoints on people’s personal freedoms? Hobbes thought that people shouldn’t have full personal freedom as that will lead to war and disastrous events, thus, they should hand over their freedom and rights to a stronger government, one who has the power over everything. In return, they will get law and order and Hobbes called this type of government the social contract. Therefore, Thomas Hobbes believed that without the governments to keep the people in order, there would be war…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘For Hobbes, the purpose of politics is to escape war. As such, he insists that in order to establish a democratic political order, all individuals need to hand over their will to a single point of ultimate authority’ (Field, 2015). Due to their beliefs on human nature, Hobbes and Machiavelli shared comparable principles with regards to the need of a sovereign ruler, and the requirement for a functioning supreme power in order to control the people. In the enlightenment period in which Hobbes wrote in his book the Leviathan about the human nature of people, he, similarly to Machiavelli, described that they were selfish and war-prone. Hobbes believed that people are not born with the understanding of what was right…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout Chapter 1 of Keeping the Republic, Barbour and Wright discuss the ideologies of three influential members of Politics: James Madison, John Locke, and Thomas Hobbes. Beginning with Madison, he believed strongly in having a republic. As the text describes it, a republic differs from a traditional sense of a democracy, as representation is required. (p.16-17). Madison believed that in a “True Democracy”, everyone would only be acting with their own self-interest in mind.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes viewed the state of nature as a state of war, where everyone is against one another. He believes that men are selfish and egoistic and that they would do anything, whether it is right or wrong, in order to satisfy their desires and passions. Therefore, Hobbes believes in an ideal society there should be a monarch or a group of people who have absolute power over everyone. The sovereign has to be above the law he enforces, he has the right to decide what doctrines might be detrimental to peace, and he has the right to choose minsters and officers to act on its behalf and enforce laws. In other words, according to Hobbes in a perfect society, the monarch has absolute power over the people and they must obey those rules (via the social…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    575). Although this is Rousseau’s view, Hobbes view is more critical regarding government. In regard to Hobbes view our text states, “And he found that people are often blinded by passion into these observations, he concluded that we need a sovereign with unconditional authority, whose power is sufficient to overawe subjects, tame their price with fear, and ensure the social peace required to protect human life and happiness” (Cahn, 2012, p. 544). This idea stems from Hobbes experience with human nature, the ugly effects that jealousy, pride, and envy expel on…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes wrote Leviathan during the English Civil War, promoting the necessity of sovereignty in order to achieve a functional society. With the influence of Francis Bacon and Niccolò Machiavelli, Hobbes presented his theories through empiricism and the social dynamics of power. Hobbes’ philosophy is a denial of classical teachings and the acceptance of science or the new age of reason. Hobbes devotes chapters in the Leviathan to even explicitly go against traditional Aristotle teachings. One of the biggest differences between Hobbes and Aristotle is the idea of the individual in presence of others and in the individual’s own space.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What was the historical significance of the political work of Hobbes? Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) was an English philosopher and political writer, best known for his book “Leviathan” (1651), in which he set out his political views on society and how governments should conduct themselves. Hobbes was writing at a very important point in history: England was going through the turmoil of civil war and this was a major influence on Hobbes’ political work. Also, Hobbes was writing just before the period known as the enlightenment and helped to sculpt the views of many other political theorists. The political work of Hobbes involved writings, being involved in political society and institutions and tutoring other intellectuals.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The State of Human Nature There is no other beast in this world, which has argued more over who is right. In our world, we amounted to heights of intelligence that have changed us from the levels of animal’s hierarchy. We’ve created ideas to create reason, civilizations for people to live together, and governments to establish rules to guide those civilizations. Some people believe that with the development of civilization, it had evolved us from a primitive side of our human nature, into a more sophisticated and civilized manner.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Machiavelli speaks to those who are in power and want to maintain it, Aristotle to those who want to live in their dream worlds, and Freud to those who believe government is nearly futile in the ability to restrict mankind’s most animalistic impulses, Hobbes speaks to those who want nothing more but stability. Using various lines of logos, Hobbes concedes that “the life of man, [is] solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” in the state of nature but has the capacity to be so much more through the structure and formulation of government, which makes his theory the most persuasive (Hobbes 78). Hobbes is not simply the most persuasive thinker through process of elimination; it is first because of his end goal of politics: security and safety. When he refers to these two abstract concepts, Hobbes does not skimp on explaining to what extent the sovereign is responsible for the people.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes cared about maximizing liberty, defining social justice, and knowing how to divide the limits of the government power. The process of the state of nature is formed by a community and a government. People would view him as a “Psychological egoist” he was over the top with an unrealistic view of human nature. In the laws of nature and the social contract, “Hobbes thinks the state of nature is something we ought to avoid, at any cost except our own self presentation” (Thomas Hobbes). Hobbes believed in a social contract and how it would help the government rule the society.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    All man is encouraged to live by the Law of nature but self-preservation stands above all else. In Locke’s State of Nature man can coexist peacefully, but in Hobbes’ society is fragmented and dangerous, a constant battle of the fittest. A Sovereign is needed to mediate and guide society, a third party into the conflict in order to resolve it. As man is eager to achieve self-preservation, he will gladly consent to the…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays