• Home Page
  • Two Lives Of Charlemagne Analysis

Two Lives Of Charlemagne Analysis

Improved Essays
Show More
The book Two Lives of Charlemagne contains two different biographies of Charles the great or “Charlemagne”, who was king of Franks from 771-814 A.D. The first biography is titled “The Life Of Charlemagne” and is written by Einhard. The second biography is titled “Charlemagne” and is authored by Notker the Stammerer. Both biographies of Charlemagne are classical medieval literature, but they differ in their points of view and focus. Einhard mostly talked about the actual life of Charlemagne, the key political decisions, wars he was in, and the projects he’d been working on to help improve the society in his kingdom. Walahfrid Strabo states that “Einhard was one of the most highly thought of among all the palace officials of that time, not …show more content…
He lived close to him and they were close friends. Einhard also states that no one would be able to write about the life of Charlemagne as he did because no one was closer to the king at the time than Einhard himself. He also did everything in chronological order which is quite amazing. When Charlemagne died Einhard was still working on the project known as The Life of Charlemagne. He wanted the exact and detailed life of Charlemagne such as day to day activities, while Notker never visited Charlemagne or his kingdom. Notker did not enter the dates of events, rather he just talked about events to make the story sound good and just gave his opinions on Charlemagne. Both of these accounts reveal that Charlemagne was a kind and generous king who was very interested and had such enthusiasm and wisdom. Charlemagne cared about the kingdom and the people of the kingdom because he had messengers to report what was going on around the kingdom so he could improve it. It seems that the Carolingian Empire was a safe and peaceful empire because they had a king who actually cared. Out of all the kings I read about in history, Charlemagne seem really great to me because he cared about his people, he was kind and smart, and was great at

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of Einhard's Life Of Charlemange
    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary Of Einhard's Life Of Charlemange

    No, Einhard’s Life of Charlemange is not a hagiography. A hagiography is writing about saints, Charlemange was not a saint. Einhard’s story was about the life and death of Charlemange as an emperor. The story talks about all the wars that had taken place under the rule of Charlemange. Charlemange had began a war on the Lombards and did not end the war until he made their king surrender and also running the king’s son out of the kingdom and Italy.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Guibert's Autobiography Of Nogent-Sous-Coucy
    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Guibert's Autobiography Of Nogent-Sous-Coucy

    The Autobiography of Guibert: Abbot of Nogent-sous-Coucy is divided into three separate books, each book conveying a different concept. The first book consists of Gibert life from youth to adulthood, in addition to a conversation with God throughout the chapters. The second book consists of history of the monastery that he lived in. The third book gives a detail description of the uprising near Laon. Guibert structured his autobiography so each book would convey a different aspect of life while he was alive.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne Character Analysis
    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charlemagne Character Analysis

    It was interesting to see that how Charlemagne has many different personalities as a leader. I found one short story that was very interesting about Charlemagne. In the story it said that “sons of two nobles, whose duty it was to keep watch at the door of the king’s tent” (88,Stammerer). The nobles did not do a very job with the task that they were given with. The nobles drank so much that they were passed out and left Charlemagne tent unguarded.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Charles The Great Dbq
    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charles The Great Dbq

    Charlemagne or Charles the Great is most famous ruler of the Middle Ages. He lived ca 742-814 and ruled over the Frankish kingdom which covered Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and a part of western Germany. He went on to conquer much of western Europe, all under a policy of friendship and cooperation with the Christian Church. He therefore greatly contributed to the expansion of the Christian Church’s power. He also introduced the basis of Feudalism and revived the political and cultural life of Europe after the fall of Western Rome.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne: The Right Action Is Better Than Knowledge
    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Charlemagne: The Right Action Is Better Than Knowledge

    Little is known about Charlemagne's childhood; in 754, however, he participated in the anointment of Pepin as king by Pope Stephen II. He was educated at the palace school primarily by Fulrad, the abbot of St. Denis (Facts). Charlemagne and his brother, Carloman, were both proclaimed king and were to rule the kingdom jointly but Carloman died unexpectedly in 771 and left Charlemagne the ruler of the entire kingdom (Facts). Though he had to rule alone, he excelled at that role and became a great leader. Charlemagne is a famous Historical figure because of his devotion to the Christian religion, as well as for his role as a community leader, and his success as an Emperor.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Life Of Charlemagne Analysis
    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Life Of Charlemagne Analysis

    Notker and Einhard both wrote accounts about Charlemagne, titled "The Life of Charlemagne. " They both respected him as a Christian and leader of the Franks, however they take an alternate point of view on him. Einhard actually knew Charlemagne, and displays him as a three-dimensional, reasonable individual, with numerous achievements a few failings. Notker considers him to be a legend that he took in of from his older folks, overwhelming and larger than life. Einhard laid out his life story logically,as a kind of historical record of Charles’ life, while Notker put together more of a collection of anecdotes.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Chrlemagne Vs Charlemagne
    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Chrlemagne Vs Charlemagne

    The strongest of the Franks were the first Carolingians, who had a son named Charlemagne. The powerful Charlemagne and his army conquered land to help his kingdom grow, as well as to help the Pope. Since Charlemagne helped the Pope, the church and the Pope both supported Charlemagne’s decisions as Emperor. Charlemagne wanted a more effective government, so he established a city in Aachen. Since Charlemagne’s empire was so large, he hired counts to help him rule his empire, as well as inspectors to keep an eye on his counts.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Perseverance In Charlemagne
    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Perseverance In Charlemagne

    In chapter 16 of The Life of Charlemagne, Einhard goes into extreme detail regarding the friendships that Charlemagne had with the rulers of other Kingdoms. At the end of the chapter, Einhard recounts a story in which “the emperors of Constantinople… were seeking his friendship and alliance. But after he had taken up the name of emperor they suspected that he might want to seize their empire, so he established such a firm treaty with them that no source of any trouble might remain between them” (Einhard 30). This goes to show the honorable way in which Charlemagne ran and expanded his empire. While Charlemagne was most definitely a ruthless leader, he also wanted to show that he was fair to his allies and did not wish to seize their empires.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Effective Was Charlemagne As A Leader?
    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Effective Was Charlemagne As A Leader?

    This will be accomplished through a thorough examination of many sources, including The Age of Charlemagne by Donald Bullough and CHARLEMAGNE. A. D. 742-814. REVIVAL OF WESTERN EMPIRE by John Lord. Within these sources,…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Charlemagne Research Paper
    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charlemagne Research Paper

    But the difference between Charlemagne and other leaders is that he was equal to any cause there was. Also, When Charlemagne would fight in a war he would win almost always there were of course times when he would lose. Once Charlemagne…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Frankish Kingdom Of France: The Holy Roman Empire
    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Frankish Kingdom Of France: The Holy Roman Empire

    This sentence highlights the controversy surrounding the issue of whether or not the Kingdom of France was subject to the authority of the Holy Roman Empire. This debate also includes the issue of whether French king was a subject of the Holy Roman Empire and, therefore, a subordinate to the Holy Roman Emperor. Because both the French and Germans claim to be descended from Charlemagne, some French argued that the transfer of power from the Frankish Kingdom to the Holy Roman Empire, which many viewed as the final and most complete empire, justifiably could have gone to the French instead of the Germans since they were both equally “heirs” the Frankish Kingdom, and by extension, the Roman Empire. The issue of whether or not the French king was…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne And The Speculum Principum
    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Charlemagne And The Speculum Principum

    Charlemagne brought monks from Ireland, England, Italy, and Spain to help with his revival of the Church. Among the most famous arrived Alcuin, Sedulius Scotus, Paul the Deacon, and Theodulf of Orleans. Several of the men would later go on to write important works in the genre of the Speculum Principum. These writings not only show how to be a good king, but also contain an element of force. The Church wanted the kings and nobles who had these works written for them that if they failed in their positions, they could face removal from office.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Carolingian Dynasty: A Frankish Noble Family
    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Carolingian Dynasty: A Frankish Noble Family

    The Carolingian dynasty was a Frankish noble family which descended directly from the Merovingian dynasty which came before it. The Merovingian dynasty was founded by Childeric I, king of the Franks from 457-481 AD, who, thanks to his many military outings against the Visigoths, Saxons and Alemanni, managed to establish a foot hold of territory for the dynasty that his son, Clovis I, would create a few years later. It wasn’t until Childeric and his wife, Basina, Queen of Thuringia’s son, Clovis I, succeeded his father in the year 481 at the young age of 15 that the Merovingian dynasty managed to unite the other Frankish tribes under the rule of one king. Clovis managed to extend the power of the Merovingian’s in the year 496 by defeating Syagrius,…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne In The Song Of Roland By Charlemagne
    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charlemagne In The Song Of Roland By Charlemagne

    The Song of Roland, the classic story of Charlemagne’s most heroic vassal and warrior, is a tale that perfectly demonstrates the feudal values and military prowess of the people of the day. Feudal society depended on the principles Roland believed in. The warlike spirit was personified through his sword, the Durendal, which holds great significance in Catholicism because it holds relics of saints and other prized artifacts. As it was the ultimate symbol of power and authority, Roland felt grave responsibility to protect it and keep it from the hands of the Spanish Muslims.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Battle Of Charlemagne's Song Of Roland
    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Battle Of Charlemagne's Song Of Roland

    Charlemagne was a medieval emperor who ruled western Europe. Around the year 771, he became the king of the Franks, which consisted of different Germanic tribes in Europe. During his reign, he had a specific goal. His goal was to unify all the Germanic tribes into one kingdom and to convert his enemies into Christians. He battled against the territories that were under Muslim rule.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings