Two Lives Of Charlemagne Analysis

Improved Essays
The book Two Lives of Charlemagne contains two different biographies of Charles the great or “Charlemagne”, who was king of Franks from 771-814 A.D. The first biography is titled “The Life Of Charlemagne” and is written by Einhard. The second biography is titled “Charlemagne” and is authored by Notker the Stammerer. Both biographies of Charlemagne are classical medieval literature, but they differ in their points of view and focus. Einhard mostly talked about the actual life of Charlemagne, the key political decisions, wars he was in, and the projects he’d been working on to help improve the society in his kingdom. Walahfrid Strabo states that “Einhard was one of the most highly thought of among all the palace officials of that time, not …show more content…
He lived close to him and they were close friends. Einhard also states that no one would be able to write about the life of Charlemagne as he did because no one was closer to the king at the time than Einhard himself. He also did everything in chronological order which is quite amazing. When Charlemagne died Einhard was still working on the project known as The Life of Charlemagne. He wanted the exact and detailed life of Charlemagne such as day to day activities, while Notker never visited Charlemagne or his kingdom. Notker did not enter the dates of events, rather he just talked about events to make the story sound good and just gave his opinions on Charlemagne. Both of these accounts reveal that Charlemagne was a kind and generous king who was very interested and had such enthusiasm and wisdom. Charlemagne cared about the kingdom and the people of the kingdom because he had messengers to report what was going on around the kingdom so he could improve it. It seems that the Carolingian Empire was a safe and peaceful empire because they had a king who actually cared. Out of all the kings I read about in history, Charlemagne seem really great to me because he cared about his people, he was kind and smart, and was great at

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    His only inability would appear to be that he did not finish a few projects including the code of laws in his country, but that was due to the almighty king doing so many good deeds all together – there are only so many things you can do at the same time! Einhard expresses only loyal respect for Charlemagne, seeing every decision he made as a beneficial one for his empire. The representation that he was given by Einhard may be somewhat biased, but I also think there is truth in to what he says. Loyalty was not an issue for Charlemagne, and he gave reason for earning that appreciation. Showing such love and kindness to all that crossed his path, as well as helping the people of his kingdom become more enlightened and well-versed, there’s no question as to why he was so highly spoken of and remembered throughout the ages (Einhard).…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne had an appearance that stood out. This due to the fact that he was tall and had a face was very symmetrical. His voice was very strong and commanded any place he was. However, his voice was not as strong as you would expect based on his look. Charles was loved by many because he was most known for his generosity and the fact that he treated everyone fairly.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The king shows to care a truly love his people when he denies to eat before anyone else is served and we see a fun king when he wants to be told stories. These things show a virtuous king. Someone who anyone would want as their king. In addition, Sir Gawain is described as humble and caring. Even though he is seen as one of the best knights he doesn’t brag or feel superior to others.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And, all of this was despite the fact that Charlemagne himself couldn’t read or write. Hence, not only was Charlemagne powerful and influential, but he also used that power and influence to mobilize a literary and intellectual revolution during his reign. Einhard was himself a product of this renaissance and the biography of Charlemagne’s life, which he wrote as a tribute, should provide sufficient evidence that Einhard considers this to be one of the factors that made Charlemagne the greatest king of the middle…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Notker and Einhard both wrote accounts about Charlemagne, titled "The Life of Charlemagne." They both respected him as a Christian and leader of the Franks, however they take an alternate point of view on him. Einhard actually knew Charlemagne, and displays him as a three-dimensional, reasonable individual, with numerous achievements a few failings. Notker considers him to be a legend that he took in of from his older folks, overwhelming and larger than life. Einhard laid out his life story logically,as a kind of historical record of Charles’ life, while Notker put together more of a collection of anecdotes.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Arthur will continue to be talked about because he always showed how a real man or knight should be. He was loyal, kind, forgiving, honest, and caring. He wanted nothing but the best for his people and his knights. He didn’t let anyone misconstrue his ideas and thoughts of what a great knight or king should be. He ruled the land to the best of his ability and loved everyone deeply.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The whole purpose of the biography is to glorify Charlemagne beyond what he really was. Throughout this essay, I am going to describe a little bit about the plot and then show some examples about the glorification of Charlemagne. The biography starts with all of the conquests of Charlemagne. Charlemagne was a huge conqueror of countries that surrounded the Frankish Kingdom. I think that Einhard makes all the conquests important because it shows how big the Frankish Kingdom was in the grand scheme of the western world.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne Achievements

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charlemagne, known as Charles the Great or King of the Franks, was a strong leader who united Western Europe through his military power. His major goals or achievements were the Carolingian Empire, Saxons War, and establishing centralized imperial rule. I consider that Charlemagne is a good leader and will go down in history. The first of Charlemagne’s accomplishments was the Carolingian Empire. Charles the Great ruled after his father Charles Martel.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Louis XIV: A Great Leader

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages

    His most monumental achievement was creating unity in the country of France. Whether it was religion, government, society or military, the country was improved after Louis’s reign. Louis XIV relates to modern day presidents all throughout the world. Many of them have improved and advanced our everyday lives to create a better world for us as the population. Although, different aspects of the government and politics have changed over the years, many policies have stayed the same.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Besides being a great leader on the battle fields, he was also seemed to know what was the best for his country. Napoleon rose the ranks of military rapidly during the French Revolution. He crowed himself emperor in 1804. He was a very skilled and ambitious strategist and successfully waged war against various coalitions of European nations and expend his empire. Bonaparte’s aim was to ensure that all artillery officers dominated and could read the mathematical…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics