5. The reason of lay investiture cause a struggle between kings and popes is that they didn’t agree with the person who can appoint church officials. 8. The reason of the German kings fail to unite their lands is that they were always getting into disagreement with the pope and in wars with…
11. The Holy Roman Empire was composed of mostly Germanic states that was lead by an emperor. 12. The investiture controversy was a disagreement amid the popes and the Holy Roman Emperors over who detained control over bishops in imperial lands.…
Unit 1 Activity 7 My country, France, has fought in this war and has several demands for Austria-Hungary and Germany. We wish that Germany return our territory Alsace- Lorraine which they took in 1870. We request that Germany and its allies accept full responsibilty for the war it has caused. We also request that Germany's military force be limited, so that it will not be a major threat in the future. These are our demands and we hope that Germany and Austria-Hungary follow them.…
The Frankish kingdom grew substantially, along with the church, during the reign of Charlemagne. As new territories were conquered they were they were Christianized; some brutally, such as the Saxons, Muslims were driven beyond the Pyrenees, and the Avars were practically annihilated. The Church looked to Charlemagne for protection, such as from the Lombards. Charlemagne wanted a center of control, however his territories were about the size of the European Union of today. This made is difficult to control.…
Many Jewish citizens were harmed and killed during the Holocaust. This is a very important era in time. People lived in fear, because Germany was taken over by Adolf Hitler, a man with a horrific plan. In addition to Hitler taking over, Anne Frank spent twenty-five months with her family Mr. Dussel and the Van Daans in hiding. Their plan was to avoid the Nazi’s to live.…
Essay Question #2 Melanie A Morway October 6, 2016 The way that our text book describes Charlemagne and the way that the selection from Einhard describes Charlemagne are different in several ways, yet there are some similarities. Our text book describes him as a man that was instrumental in implementing the practices of a Feudal society in Europe. “Perhaps the most important ruler to codify and adopt these practice was Charlemagne, who dreamed not only of unifying Europe under his rule, but also unifying Church and state in a single administrative and political bureaucracy”(Sayre, pg 82). Our text book goes on the discuss Charlemagne’s accomplishments. Einhard’s writing takes a more personal turn, and describes not only his personal and private life, but also describes his looks.…
In my opinion, the more important area to control was inside the French Empire. He already controlled most of Europe, and if he didn't focus on what he already had, the people in the French Empire would angry that he was neglecting the people who stuck by his side. Also, if he had controlled more of Europe, he wouldn't be able to control his other countries. By 1812, the only parts of Europe not under his control were Britain, Portugal, Sweden, and the Ottoman Empire. Besides the French Empire he controlled many small, independent countries including Spain, the Grand Duchy of Warsaw, and multiple German Kingdoms in Middle Europe.…
Monasticism was exceptionally well suited for the Carolingian period due to the lack of urban life. Monastery’s were self contained and self sustaining and did not have a need for outside trading. They also acted as a good meeting point for rural civilians where they could meet up and trade goods without needing to go all the way to a town or city. The Carolingian world was extremely rural and feudal, the society was based on a hierarchy that was rather strict. There was very little urban life and the majority of the population was spread out through the land.…
Notker and Einhard both wrote accounts about Charlemagne, titled "The Life of Charlemagne. " They both respected him as a Christian and leader of the Franks, however they take an alternate point of view on him. Einhard actually knew Charlemagne, and displays him as a three-dimensional, reasonable individual, with numerous achievements a few failings. Notker considers him to be a legend that he took in of from his older folks, overwhelming and larger than life. Einhard laid out his life story logically,as a kind of historical record of Charles’ life, while Notker put together more of a collection of anecdotes.…
John Watts states that one of the most fundamental political ideas of the middle ages was the concept of the Roman Empire. Although the ancient empire of Rome was long past its glory, Watts maintains that “it had suited almost every succeeding regime across the Mediterranean and beyond to adopt some at least of what it understood to be the rights, rituals and accoutrements of imperial power, and to insist on some kind of continuity with the Roman imperial tradition”. Rome, as a concept and an idea, was the bedrock of almost every formal political structure in medieval Europe. The Holy Roman Empire was arguably the epitome of this political practice.…
This shows the way in which Charlemagne approached the running of his empire with dignity and honor and the belief in doing what was right. There is also a similar theme present in Beowulf. After Beowulf returned from the land of the Danes, the King of the Geats was killed. As was custom, the throne proceeded to his son. However, the Queen held “no belief in her son’s ability to defend their homeland against foreign invaders” (Beowulf 2371-2372).…
In those wars he so splendidly added to the Frankish kingdom that he nearly doubled its size” (140). In addition to the successful expansion, King Charles “increased the glory of his kingdom by winning over kings and peoples through friendly means”…
In an attempt to justify the need for imperialism in France, Ferry states, “she (France) ought to propagate this influence throughout the world and carry everywhere that she can her language, her customs, her flag, her arms, and her genius” (Ferry, 3). He tries to use Frances’ reputation of greatness and implies that the rest of the globe needs to know their capabilities by proposing this kind of foreign control. Ferry believes that France should take part in imperialism because “Nations are great in our times only by means of the activities when they develop, it is not simply by the peaceful shining forth of institutions” (Ferry, 2). He is proposing that France vie with territories around them and move forward with industrialization. Ferry is stating that France needs to compete with its neighbors in order to prevent falling behind.…
Two lives of Charlemagne is a book that has the writings of two people that wrote about the life of Charlemagne. The first person was a man named Einhard who wrote a biography of Charlemagne’s life. The second was Notker the Stammerer who wrote about the deeds of Charlemagne. The writings from Einhard and Notker combine to make the book Two lives of Charlemagne. The text will focus on six ideals from the text.…
Introduction: Charlemagne was the King of the Franks from 768 and Emperor of the Romans from 800 until his death in 814. He expanded his kingdom to an empire, uniting most of west Europe. The Carolingian Renaissance is associated with his reign, a time when art and culture was revived through the Catholic Church, which encouraged a common European identity. Chapter 1 who is Charlemagne?…