Analysis Of The Classical Christian Doctrine By Ronald E. Heine

Improved Essays
The Classical Christian Doctrine, written by Ronald E. Heine demonstrates the relationship that early Christians had with Christ and shows what early Christians thought of the Messiah. What makes a “classical Christian Doctrine” classical: views that are accepted to be true by most Christians within the first four centuries that Christianity had become a major staple of significance. The Classical Christian Doctrine is found in a shortened version in the Nicene Creed. During the first four centuries when Christianity was becoming of importance, all the major doctrines had been set by the church; It stated everything that is true and false of Jesus. During that time, it was not considered to be acceptable that Jesus was divine because he was of human flesh. It was also not considered to be acceptable to view Jesus as less than being equivalent to God. The belief that there is only one true God is crucial in Christianity. Scripture plays a crucial role in Christianity because it is the only way that one can ever know of what early Christians believed and followed; this set the basis for Christianity. “Hear, Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord.” Deuteronomy 6:4. Deuteronomy is stating the affirmation that God is our one Lord. I believe scripture is an important component to Christianity because it helps …show more content…
Ancient Philosophers were confused by the existence of God and Jesus. Were they the same or were Christians worshipping two Gods? They did not understand that Jesus was of the same substance that God was. Jesus was the Son of God, but was also God. Plato believed there was a “supreme principle” called “the One” or “the Good,” but that “supreme principle” was viewed intellectually and transcendently. He was simply saying that God could exist, but was not admitting to the existence of there being one God like the Christian faith

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Significant evidence for God’s existence has failed to settle the ongoing debate regarding whether or not God exists. Philosophers have formulated theories to either prove or disprove God’s existence. Evidently, there is not a correct theory since God’s existence can actually ever be proven, however, there are philosophers who are more successful in arguing for their views of God’s existence compared to other philosophers. Thomas Aquinas, a renowned philosopher and regarded as one of the greatest Christian theologians, philosophized about the existence of God. Aquinas’ five ways thoroughly explain how God exists by noting how certain notions in our universe cannot work solely on their own.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both sought to prove the existence of God in their writing. And, both of them used the ontological argument, which is an argument not based on the observations of the world, but through natural reasoning alone. But, they both had differences not only in the opinion, but on how to reach a side in an argument. Aquinas very much so believed in God, and using natural reasonings he thought he could prove the existence of God. Aquinas knew that you cannot prove that God exists for someone who does not believe through faith alone.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantian Theory Of Religion

    • 2435 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Although New Age best describes what Kant would accept as a pure religion, a Kantian religion would be comprised of a group of extremely confused individuals who would truly never achieve anything. There would be no religion. The Christian religion is based on the divine nature of a man named Jesus. Jesus was a human who, depending on the denomination…

    • 2435 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The hierarchy of the Trinity has been a controversial topic since the death of Jesus. Arians believed that the Son did not always exist but was begotten by the Father, at a point in time, Jesus was seen as a lesser entity. For the Proto-Orthodoxy believers, this was problematic because they believe that the Son (Jesus) always existed like the Father (God) there was no division. The contradiction of beliefs between the Arians and the Orthodoxy provides an understanding of why the Trinity was such a controversial topic within early Christianity. If one cannot explain the status of the Son then how can they explain the foundation of the Trinity?…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, natural knowledge is not the same thing as faith; they are completely different. As Aquinas’ thinking continued, it talked about issues that one had to assume that there was in fact a God. The next question he asked was whether or not God had a body. Aquinas first believes that God has a body because that is what the Holy Bible says. I was not able to agree with this opinion because the Holy Bible also says…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hence there is no way to know reality behind the empirical world. A natural consequence is the complete negation of knowledge of God. To Ayer, even the word God or a transcendental being was meaningless because it was not definitional. This is worse than traditional agnosticism, which at least, tried to figure out the existence of God. To agnostics such as Ayer or Wittgenstein, even though one may experience God, such experience is inexpressible.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Before we can begin a discussion about our need to turn our nation back to God, we must address the relationship between God and the person of Jesus Christ. The Bible is clear that Jesus is God’s only begotten Son. I believe this to be fact. Jesus, however, is also God. I know this is a tough concept to grasp.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is possible to prove that truth exists but belief is almost impossible. A belief can be explained in many different ways like the different religions do in explaining the existence of God, but truth can only be explained in only one way, what the proponents of this theory expect. The concept of God’s existence is a belief proposal and not a truth. A belief proposal is not a knowledge whereas a truth is based on the knowledge. When the proponents of the theory of conflicting truths argue against the existence of God, they seem to interpret it as a knowledge and not a belief proposal, and when they fail to find the knowledge to support the existence of God, then they discredit the same existence.…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    made just like Gods? Or does God even have a body? How can we mentally be made in His image when we are prone to sinning, but God cannot sin? It also raises the question of whether we can take this verse literally or metaphorically. In essence, the Bible is very problematic in its interpretation of whether we should take…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand Tritheism states that God, Jesus and the holy Spirit are in fact, three different gods (Kidd, “The Trinity”). Obviously this ideology cannot fit within Christian doctrine since the First Commandment only allows for one God; it is a monotheistic religion. Because of the flaws within these two ideologies, Christians must find an in between explanation for the…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays