The Challenges Of Mesopotamia And Rome And Roman Empires

Superior Essays
Mesopotamia and Rome were two civilizations that were both highly impactful on world history. Even today, we can see themes that have transcended centuries. One of the themes that linked these two superpowers together was expansionism, a force that both built and destroyed these empires. As leaders in many spheres of government and culture, it was no surprise the rulers wanted to expand their borders. In this essay, I will dive more into this, exploring what each did to ensure permanent strength and sway in their time. Rome, for example, was known for their expansionist ways, a trend that would ultimately lead to their destruction. On the other hand, Mesopotamia was also a powerful and influential kingdom, yet they had a different style of …show more content…
Originally, the Roman Empire only had control of area inside of present day Italy and Sicily. The empire would expand greatly as the years went on. Unlike the Mesopotamians, Rome did not have to suffer the change of empires, making it relatively easier to spread their empire. Out of the history of Rome’s influential emperors, one of the most successful would be Julius Caesar. During his reign, the Roman empire expanded greatly, pushing its borders from only Italy and Spain to Gaul, Northern Africa, and Anatolia. These successes were only made possible by Rome’s superior system of roads, military training, and economy. All of these factors went into creating the Empire, one of most powerful forces of all time. A great Roman author, Virgil once wrote in his book The Aeneid, “Roman, remember that you shall rule the nations by your authority, for this is to be your skill, to make peace the custom, to spare the conquered, and to wage war until the haughty are brought low.” This quote best sums up Rome at the height of its power. Being one of the most influential empires in the world, Rome had expanded greatly, having control over many places. This power and authority did, however, have its downsides. Ironically, the factor that put Rome on the world stage also took them off of it. The empire was so thinly spread, it was hard to control every …show more content…
While Rome changed leaders, yet kept a steady empire, Mesopotamia changed empires often. This change in empires was brought on by a number of different things. Despite changing states more than Rome, the Mesopotamians managed to continue to expand. Their largest expanse was during the Neo-Assyrian Empire. This empire was a powerful and influential force in the Middle East at its time. To maintain their empire, they set up harsh laws for crimes and established a nearly invincible army, being one of the first forces to be armed with iron weapons. In addition to this, they had fighting techniques that put them ahead of other places. With their military and financial might, the Neo-Assyrians pushed the boundaries of their land from Mesopotamia outwards to part of Anatolia, the Levant, and Egypt. No previous Mesopotamian empires had spanned this large of an area of control. “More than anything else, the Assyrian army excelled at siege warfare, and was probably the first force to carry a separate corps of engineers…Assault was their principal tactic against the heavily fortified cities of the Near East. They developed a great variety of methods for breaching enemy walls: sappers were employed to undermine walls or to light fires underneath wooden gates, and ramps were thrown up to allow men to go over the ramparts or to attempt a breach on the upper section of wall where it was the least thick.” (Fighting

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages

    c. The Roman Empire was made successful by having the cities provide the empire with troops. This increased the strength of the army, allowing Rome to expand their conquered territory. Another reason for their success was their tolerance. Their empire was diverse, all people were allowed in Rome.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Emperors weren’t succeeded lawfully, but by conquest. During this time, Rome’s leaders and armies began to fight against each other for power, leaving the Roman Empire weak and susceptible to…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout Global history, there have been many river valleys which play a big role on early civilization and make the important contribution to the world. Three civilization of these is Mesopotamia, India, and China. Mesopotamia is the land that located between Tigris and Euphrates river. This can be considered as the reason why Mesopotamia called Mesopotamia. In Greek, it technically means between two rivers, and obviously this is exactly what was happening.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mesopotamia DBQ

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. In the Old Stone Age animals were hunted and fished for food and the skins were used for clothing. In the Middle Stone Age animals were domesticated. In the New Stone Age they raised animals and learned to weave baskets, make clothing from plant fibers and wool, and make clay pots. 2.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Many Empires of Mesopotamia Through constant war, Mesopotamia was crudely shaped through cookie-cutter fashion of each empire’s peak, earning her the rightful place as a cradle of civilization. Her cultures changed with every dawning era, and her views grew more perceptive until a final, ethical Zoroastrianism. Whether Sumerian, Babylonian, Chaldean, or Persian, Mesopotamia cradled each, defining the meaning of civilization through life and the gods. Ultimately, introducing the basic way of life for Mesopotamia begins with the first of the people to settle in the area—the Sumerians.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fall of the Roman Empire In approximately 200 AD, the ruling power of Greece started to diminish whereas the Roman Empire continued to expand at an exponential rate. The Roman Army persisted in their efforts to seize territory, and was so thorough in its imperialistic endeavors that it grew to an impressive size. Rome, obtaining the title of preeminent empire of the ancient world for several centuries, was comprised of various elements from successful societies such as the Greeks and Etruscans. These foreign lands impacted the republican government organization and further political ideology as well as the basic social and religious morals of the Roman people. Compared to all healthy governments, Western Rome faced trials regarding its…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the Assyrian kings were more cruel in the way they operated, the Persian kings (such as Cyrus the Great) was a bit more compassionate. Regardless of these disparities, they were still two successful empires in their own…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The New Assyrian and Persian empires were two of the earliest major empires in the world. First came the Assyrians which ruled from 900-600BC, and the Persians began their rule around 550BC. Even with these two empires becoming major establishments in what is known today as the middle east, they are quite different from each other when it comes to many ideologies. Such differences could include: warfare, religion, social hierarchy, and many other things that shape the way we reflect on two of our earliest, and most powerful empires known to man. When it came to the Assyrian empire, one thing that immediately stands out is their brute force and utter determination to dominate the land and people around them.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This extremeness could also be due to their government system. While the Egyptian Pharaohs controlled over one land mass single handed, the Mesopotamians had a city-state system, making it difficult for each area to be on the same boat. This system could be what led to the fall and separation of the Mesopotamia region. In short, the Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations were very different. Despite their proximity and similar beginnings and influences, each culture provides us with varied insights as to how life was lived during ancient times.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unlike Egypt, which was protected from outside invasion by natural barriers, Mesopotamia was a vast open region. As civilizations rose and fell, new empires were born making the Ancient Near East an unending battleground.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many efforts were made in order to save Rome from its decline, such as: the Edict of Milan, and moving the capital to Constantinople; another effort was made in Rome’s late antiquity period. The empire would not have lasted in its imperial phase, as it was too big to sustain, and that caused its ultimate downfall (Dutton 172). In conclusion, the Roman Empire was a diverse nation with diverse leaders. Both Augustus and Constantine were powerful leaders, who had different approaches to try to save the empire.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the late Roman Republic, the external expansion of early Rome was a surprise to many. The era of the great expansion of Roman power and civilization is the era of the Roman Republic, in which its Senate ruled Rome and its assembly, which were establishments, formed at the beginning of the monarchy. The Republic had a history of many conflicts, aiding the Republic in becoming so powerful, thus making Rome become unstoppable. But as we all know from the conflicts that aroused in the past with many other large city-states and Empire’s, with incredible power comes many dilemmas.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A strong army, strong economy, and strong ties to other countries though trade Rome was prosperous. Power was mainly in the upper class’s hands, much like the Byzantine, Roman, and Persian Empires. A hierarchy was established and followed closely. Rome was not a dictatorship like Persia and Byzantine Empires; it was ruled by an emperor who has the highest amount of power, but a senate was also involved. The senate did not necessarily represent the average people of Rome, they kept the power spread out more.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also Egypt was ruled over as one society and Mesopotamia was composed of many city-states ruled by multiple kings. The Pharaoh, king in Egypt, would respect his followers so that they can follow him by their own will. Be not arrogant because of what you know; deal with the ignorant as well as the learned (Ptah Hotep 1). The ideal was for the Pharaoh to respect all, regardless of status or intelligence. This will led to the buildings of structures to present…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilization were two civilizations in South West Asia and North West Africa, beginning in 3,500 - 3,000 B.C.E. Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilizations both had similar religious beliefs, however their environment and culture, interaction and exchange, and city-states were different. Egyptians operated under a centralized government while, the Mesopotamians had self-controlled city-state governments. (Strayer, 82-83) The environment of each civilization was different, which may have been the reason for they developed well defined political and religious beliefs.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays