Euphiletus Trial Essay

Improved Essays
This paper will discuss the case of Euphiletus and how he got put to trial for killing the man his wife was having relations with. Euphiletus testifies that the letter of the law protects a man if he does find his wife in bed with another man and out of anger kills him. On the other hand, the spirit of the law says, because Euphiletus took five days to actually commit the murder the letter of the law does not apply to his case. Through Euphiletus court testimony he has given proof to prove that the murder of Eratosthenes was a justifiable homicide through the great gender roles played in Greek society and as well as the great honor.

To start off, Eratosthenes death was a justifiable homicide in Euphiletus defense. The crime Euphiletus committed was not only a public crime but was also a public service. It was a public crime due to the fact that he gathered all the male neighbors who were at home that night to gather torches and have them as audiences as well as witnesses. Euphiletus brought them as
…show more content…
Ancient Greek was heavy on honor. Arête is an importance in Ancient Greek society. Having honor is what makes you a man in Greece. One can obtain honor by three way: Being a good fighter, having wealth, and being a good lover. In this case, Euphiletus’s honor was simultaneously gained and lost. He gained some honor by killing a man. In Greek society killing a man gave one so much honor; especially in Sparta, due to their war like society. By having witnesses at the murder scene, Euphiletus was able to share that proud moment of killing a man, the man that disrespected him and his family with many of his neighbors. To many, Euphiletus’s lost his honor. One would say he lost his honor by his unmanly action of hatching a plan for five days to kill the man who slept with his wife, rather than killing him right when he found out. Others would say he lost his honor because he let another man continually sleep with his wife in his own

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Against The Death Penalty

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the case of Timothy Evans in 1949 (Jesse, 1957) who was accused of murdering his wife and daughter after proclaiming his innocence stating he believed his neighbor committed the murders. Evan’s subsequent death by hanging, later led authorities to discover evidence 3 years later the neighbor was the one who in fact a serial killer who had killed 6 other women and Evan’s daughter. The judicial system ignored vital evidence during the trial of Timothy Evans that caused the miscarriage of justice leading to his death for a crime he did not commit. It was not until 16 years later a judicial system exonerated him and overturned his conviction; unfortunately it is too late for…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Harold has a 0.30 pistol that killed his brother and he is tried for murder by killing his own brother (Assisted Suicide: A Right or a Wrong?). This has explain that many people with cancer or other terminally illness wanted to die because they are tried for fighting for their life and just wanted to give up and to those who help will be tried for murder even though they don’t want to do it. There are many rational, non-religious argument for banning "voluntary euthanasia (Non-Religious Arguments against 'Voluntary Euthanasia '). Any method of suicide is shocking for the people left behind who love the person who has obvious took their life. This has shown what a great impact is has left the family to those committed suicide.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the news article, “Ohio Man’s Shooting Of Ailing Wife Raises Questions About ‘Mercy Killings’” (The New York Times –August 23, 2012), a 66 year old man murdered his severely sick wife. This man, however, didn’t just kill his wife because he wanted to. He killed her because she was going through immense amounts of pain, to the point where she wanted to die. He couldn’t stand seeing his wife in such a state. He wanted to help her.…

    • 2147 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Romeo Guilty

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He should be convicted of second degree murder because he murdered someone, wasn’t protecting anyone, killed out of rage. Romeo has just gotten married with Juliet and was filled with love. Coincidentally, Tybalt and Mercutio were just engaging in a fight. He tried to prevent the fight but, failed. Tybalt kills Mercutio, Romeo’s friend.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jealousy took over him and drove him to kill his brother by putting poison in his ears (Act 3 Scene 3 ). By doing that he didn’t let his brother have a chance or confessing all his sins. The reason Gertrude is a big part of this sin is because when her husband died she went and married her husband's brother not that late when her first husband passed. She didn’t wait that long before she went to Hamlet's uncle's arm…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This story is about the trail of Euphiletos who is been incriminated for the killing of Eratosthenes after he caught him and his wife committing adultery. Euphiletos committed the murder in front of witnesses and he has to prove that he didn’t plan the murder but acted legally instead. To achieve this he needs to explain his live before the murder and the murder itself to the jury. He does this by painting picture of an ordinary man in his speech and this gives the reader the history the Athenian people and their laws. It is interesting how Euphiletos blamed the adultery on Eratosthenes instead of his wife.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was stated that the boys murdered their parents out of self-defense, fearing for their lives after years of abuse. To clarify, this argument was an “Imperfect self-defense, in most legal contexts, allows defendants to contend that they had killed out of fear that their lives were threatened, a fear that might seem groundless to an impartial outsider observer but that the defense maintained seemed real to the defendants because of prolonged psychological or sexual abuse.”(Spare Menendez's). The brothers had claimed that both their mother and father had been physically and emotionally abusing them since they were children. A cousin of the family testified for the defense and said, “Lyle was just 8 when he told her 'he was afraid to sleep in his own bed because his father and him had been touching each other down there”(Cousin Breaks Silence). This further backed the…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Q1 The Simon Gittany Murder Case features an intimate femicide. This is evident in how the perpetrator, Gittany, behaved and how he treated his partner, Lisa Harnum, prior to her death. Intimate femicide almost always consists of the perpetrator being possessive and controlling of his partner, and also features a sudden outburst of rage before the homicide takes place. Both of these factors occurred in the case, and were thus referred to domestic violence. Gittany was engaged to Harnum, but he lost his temper and ended her life before she had the chance to get married, concluding this homicide as an act of femicide.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whether it’s a command or not, someone is killing another person. We don’t know if the person who committed the crime was commanded to do it in return to let a loved one live, so why not place that person in jail without parole instead of killing them? Then years later you find out that the person you executed was actually guilty but there’s nothing you could do about it because you took the “easy” way out and killed the person. In the documentary, Deadline from 2004 , the warden said that the death penalty was a gruesome act towards him and other prison guards because it made them look like killers themselves (Document 9). This shows the pressure that wardens themselves feel about having to kill someone making the death penalty a cruel punishment because even people who are not on the death row are affected to even participate in such act.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Making A Murderer Analysis

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Clutter’s crime, Perry changed his final testimony to that he killed the whole Clutter family, not Dick. However, the result of the trial is to give both of them death penalty, that didn’t make sense because if both the testimony and the evidences couldn’t show that Dick murdered people, why he was punished by death penalty. There were also miscalculations in the crime of Avery which most caused by the bias of the police officers. Avery was charged by a rape crime, which evidences were forged by the police in 1985, they changed the picture of the suspect to a man which was like Avery although was different from the description of the victim and they also ignored the alibi of Avery proved by 22 people. Another charge of Avery after he was finally free in 2005 was the police thought he murdered Teresa, however, the evidences of the crime were mostly fake, parts of Teresa’s burned bones were found in Avery’s yard and her car key was found in Avery’s room, but the bones had unusual fracture and were separated located in another two places, and there was no Teresa’s finger print on her car key.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays