Was Hiroshima Bombing Nagasaki Justified

Superior Essays
1945 was the end of the biggest war in US history, and there is one major event that is one of the most argued topics about history to date. America was the first country ever to use the atomic bomb in warfare and it was very catastrophic, but the age-old question is still debated today: was it necessary to use the atomic bomb in warfare at all, let alone twice? The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was very destructive to the people and the land, killing over 100,000 people on impact and later tens of thousands more from: sickness, disease, radiation, etc. and destroying the majority of the land creating a fallout. This controversy is very important to society because people argue that if the bombs were not dropped thousands of innocent lives …show more content…
One of the sides is that the bombing of the two cities was justified because without it, Japan might not have ever surrendered in the war. Boas explains this here by saying, "The extremists thought we should fight to the bitter end until every man had been killed....In a way it could be said that the atomic bombings and Russia 's sudden attack on Japan helped to bring about the end of the war. If those events had not happened, Japan at that stage probably could not have stopped fighting” (1). This quote supports this side because it summarizes that if we hadn’t dropped the bombs then there was still a chance that Japan would have kept on …show more content…
If the bombing had never happened there was a great chance that the Japanese would have never backed out of the war and it would have gone on longer and many more American soldier lives would have been lost. When the bombs were dropped it prevented the possibility of more attacks coming from Japan onto American and killing American civilians. When the bombs were dropped America’s morale was at an all-time high, and everyone was feeling fantastic because of the incredible feat even more than when the test had been a success back, “In mid-July, after the successful test of the bomb in New Mexico, scientists at Los Alamos had snake-danced with joy. They had pulled off a stunning exercise in physics, brilliantly solving a technical challenge of incredible complexity” (Parshall 1). Everyone was extremely happy because of what the American scientists had pulled off, and no one thought twice about it, everyone was just so happy. “The White House announcement called the atomic bomb ‘the greatest achievement of organized science in history.’ But when Groves telephoned J. Robert Oppenheimer in Los Alamos to report the success of the Enola Gay 's mission, the most Oppenheimer could say was that "everybody is feeling reasonably good about it”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: Dropping the Atomic Bomb on Japan The decision President Truman had to make regarding dropping a fission bomb onto Japanese cities in order to end the war would have been too hard for most of us to handle. America was weary after 4 years of almost total war with Germany, Italy, and Japan and the war needed to end. At this point, Japan was alone and dragging its feet after many losses. From the history we know, the decision was justified as it ended a devastating war with no end in sight and it saved more lives than were lost.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paul Fussell, U.S Infantryman in Europe stated, “When bombs were dropped and the news began to circulate that we would not be obligated in a few months to rush up the beaches near Tokyo assault-firing while being machine-gunned, mortared and shelled we broke down and cried with relief and joy”(Document H). A land invasion of Japan would have been inevitable if the bombs had not been dropped on Japan. A day similar to D-Day would have occurred which would have undoubtedly created more problems. The American soldiers rejoiced at the bombing of Japan because they knew that the fighting was over and their lives would not be at risk anymore in the war. Document E depicts a physical map of Japan.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It had appeared that the Japanese were not going to surrender the way America wanted them to. Of course a big reason why the bomb was used is that if Japan would have been invaded, the death toll could have potentially reached half a million or more instead of the hundreds of thousands that were killed by the atomic bomb. It is said that if the war had continued the amount of American lives lost could have greatly diminished the amount that was killed by the bombs. It is hard to tell what could have really happened but it is certain that if the war had continued so would the loss of…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tens of thousands were killed in the bombing, naming it inhumane. The bomb’s purpose was not to harm innocent people, its purpose was to first get the Japanese government to surrender, if didn’t surrender then attack cities that help create war material. Innocent lives could have been saved if they evacuated the cities as warned. The dropping of the two atomic bombs saved millions of lives of Americans and the lives of Japaneses. The Japanese government plan was to invade America in a land invasion, causing up to 5 to 10 million casualties of Japanese fighters.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, I investigated the sources that were against the use of the bomb before the bomb was dropped including the intentions behind the bomb, and concerns from the Interim Committee . Then I looked at the evidence against the bomb after the bomb was dropped, including Henry Stimson’s concerns, and the horrific loss of Japanese life due to the bomb. It is interesting to see the difference between the worries before the bomb and after the bomb. The first document I looked at was Dropping the Atomic Bomb was Neither Necessary Nor Justifiable by Gar Alperovitz. In his essay he argues one of the reasonings for the use of the bomb was to scare the Soviets and to prevent an invasion of the Red Army in Manchuria.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    You have heard two reasons why dropping the atomic bombs in Japan was not justified and unnecessary. But perhaps the most compelling reasons why dropping the bomb was not justified is that the United States was weeks or months away from Japan surrendering and the war ending before dropping the bombs and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people. As you will hear from General Mitsuru Ushijima, Japan was already losing the war. The country was surrounded by US troops, Americans controlled Japanese airspace and waterways, and US casualties in military battles were low compared to Japanese. The US commanders knew that Japan was close to surrendering as Germany had already surrendered, and Russia, another powerful military force, was…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Decades after the atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Americans still question whether it was a good idea to drop them. One of the reasons the bombs should have been dropped is the bombing of Pearl Harbor. The United States and Japan were at peace until Japan bombed a military base in Hawaii and afterward, president Franklin D. Roosevelt declared war on Japan. In his well-known infamy speech, FDR stated, “I ask that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, December 7th, 1941, a state of war has existed between the United States and the Japanese empire.” America and its people saw the bombing as an act of war and in return, they declared war.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This extraordinary letter written by Albert Einstein to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was written on August 2nd, 1939 to inform the President on the potential plans of the creation of a nuclear bomb. The letter was an official document written by Einstein and mailed out to the white house in Washington D.C. During this time, World War Two was on the brink of being unleashed, and many physicists were studying the effects of Uranium in possible preparation for the war. Furthermore, Albert Einstein was in America working with other physicists on the puissant bomb during the time of the formation of this letter. Einstein letter is filled with multiple opinions and options to President Roosevelt, such as, the latest findings on uranium, his feelings towards the use of uranium, his ideas on having a “middle-man” between the physicists and government officials, and the lack of…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Revisionists believe that the bombs were dropped mainly because of a concept called ‘atomic diplomacy’. Atomic diplomacy is the idea that the bombs were dropped not to force Japanese surrender, but to send a message to Stalin that the US was powerful. Some revisionists take this claim further and say that Russia’s invasion of Manchuria was what prompted the Japanese to surrender, not the atomic bombs. They say that the US wanted to intimidate Russia, and show that they had been successful with creating the new…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki drastically altered international politics by changing the scope and consequences of international warfare, as well as causing a widespread hysteria over the use of nuclear warfare that led to conflicts such as the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. On August 6, 1945, the world was changed forever. On that fateful day the United States plunged the world into the chaos of nuclear warfare by dropping the first nuclear bomb in world history. The bomb brought with it an absolutely unparalleled level of destruction to the Japanese city of Hiroshima. In less than a second, the lives of more than 100,000 people were brought to a sudden, fiery conclusion.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roughly seventy years ago marked the explosion of the nuclear bombs dropped over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The merciless bombs were dropped on August 6, 1945, by an American officer in the U.S Air Force by the name of Charles W. Sweeney, on a Booing B-29 Superfortress bomber plane during the final stages of World War II (1939-1945). The mid nineteen forty 's was without a doubt a staggering time for the Japanese nation; this was a period loaded with resentment and anger as they glimpsed a massive nuclear bomb headed straight to them as a B-29 bomber fled the scene after destroying almost their entire city. According to an online historical article provided by the history channel titled “Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki”, the impact wiped out nearly 90 percent of the city and killed over 80,000 people instantly before the bomb had even hit the ground; a few thousand later then died because of the immense amount of radiation after affect the bomb…

    • 1322 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays