According to Margaret A. Farley “the large questions” about sexuality, is that there are three that is central to the intelligibility of any framework; for sexual ethics. The first has to do with the moral status of the human body and its meaning, and its interest and value vis-à-vis the whole person and givenness and contingencies. When approaching the topic on sexuality it raises different viewpoints and it’s meaning in society, sexuality is often described or depict a way a person expresses themselves, as a sexual being. Moreover, how a person chooses to express their sexuality and the type of partner they choose should be left to that individual to decide. The second question Farley possess is the increasingly complex question of gender-
…show more content…
Furthermore, she states that the soul needs the body for knowledge, ideally to rule the body ordering its feelings, desires and providing for its needs. However, this address a philosophical view, because not every individual can identify with the understanding of the body being separate, take for an example the Hebrews in the early centuries had an idea of the soul but did not separating it from the body. On the other hand, early Christians, believe that the soul is in the body, without the soul the bod cannot live. In addition, the body is considered the house of the soul and the soul and is also the house of the spirit you cannot have one without the other. Nevertheless, Farley also mentioned different theorist who battles with the same notion of body, mind and spirit. In the same way, Rene Descartes coupled with the same substance of mind and body, “Je pense donc que je suis” if you are able to think, therefore you do exist. So, the body and the soul have to co-exist, no one can prove that the existence of the body without the soul. On the contrary, Individuals should have the freedom to express themselves, because America is a fast pace evolving world, and many practices which were done in early years ago are not practiced anymore. People should have an open mind and embrace everyone's differences, which will help us become tolerant towards those who does not share the same
Furthermore, she states that the soul needs the body for knowledge, ideally to rule the body ordering its feelings, desires and providing for its needs. However, this address a philosophical view, because not every individual can identify with the understanding of the body being separate, take for an example the Hebrews in the early centuries had an idea of the soul but did not separating it from the body. On the other hand, early Christians, believe that the soul is in the body, without the soul the bod cannot live. In addition, the body is considered the house of the soul and the soul and is also the house of the spirit you cannot have one without the other. Nevertheless, Farley also mentioned different theorist who battles with the same notion of body, mind and spirit. In the same way, Rene Descartes coupled with the same substance of mind and body, “Je pense donc que je suis” if you are able to think, therefore you do exist. So, the body and the soul have to co-exist, no one can prove that the existence of the body without the soul. On the contrary, Individuals should have the freedom to express themselves, because America is a fast pace evolving world, and many practices which were done in early years ago are not practiced anymore. People should have an open mind and embrace everyone's differences, which will help us become tolerant towards those who does not share the same