Anti Federalist Approach Analysis

Superior Essays
The question of the proper role and scope of government has remained one of the fundamental conflicts in the United States since its inception. The nation’s Founding Fathers were all ultimately skeptical of government, but in very different ways. While the Federalists favored a stronger, more structured Federal level governed by a central Constitution, the Anti-Federalists feared centralized power and Constitutional control over the states – who in their minds were more responsive to their citizenry and more accurately reflected the desires and wishes of their respective populations. Both groups, however, were ultimately attempting to preserve liberty – simply disagreeing on the best method to do so. The Federalist approach believed that a …show more content…
Anti-Federalists fought for a Bill of Rights to be included within the Constitutional framework governing the federal government so as to explicitly codify individual rights under the law. Their skepticism regarding the nature of government recognized state action and the liberties of the individual citizen are typically antithetical in nature and in need of explicit protection. Some Federalists on the other hand were actually fearful of such methods, worrying that explicitly listing the rights of the individual was an inherently limiting approach to liberty – with the idea that those which were not listed were not fundamentally retained by the people. James Madison stated, “[T]he government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. It is not like the state governments, whose powers are more general.” James Madison original position prior to Constitutional ratification and the inclusion of the Bill of Rights was that the Constitution inherently restricted the powers of the national government to those that were clearly defined. He noted that any enumeration or specific listing of rights was going to be incomplete and therefore would leave important, non-enumerated, rights …show more content…
The American form of government was designed to be neither the source rights or the provider of what those rights can be used for. It established a culture of opportunity, but with no guarantee of success. That was the culture, which, in his first inaugural address, Jefferson defined as protecting people from injuring each other but otherwise generally leaving them to their own devices.3 The goal is not equality of outcome – on the contrary, such a notion is antithetical to the notion of liberty – but equality of opportunity. Those who better utilize their skills and the opportunities afforded to them, can and should receive more than those who do not. Such is the original notion of ‘fair’ in the United States. While an imperfect union from the start, the goal was not perfection, but to establish a new and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The anti-federalist thought that this new document would have all the same characteristics of Great Britain the country they had fought so hard to extract themselves from and others feared that this new government threatened their personal liberties. The Anti-Federalist demanded a document that protected states rights and individual rights and eventually the Federalist made The Bill Of Rights. I am standing here today signing the ratification of the constitution because of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists making this…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The anti-federalists feared that the central government would become too powerful and that if the government would commit an infraction on the states’ rights. The Federalists were in agreement with the constitution. The federalists were wealthy, well educated and were unified by the thought of higher power. The leaders of the Federalists included John Adams and Alexander Hamilton both yearned for an effective constitution. In contrast, the Anti-federalists were generally farmers and anybody that fell below the line of being wealthy.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gage Lozano Perception Recently gaining independence from Great Britain was a notable achievement for the new country of America, but a great divide in the thoughts and actions that would determine the fate of the government became increasingly uneasy. Two opposing ways of thinking evolved and battled for how we would establish our country: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. While both seemingly concerned for the well being of the country, the predominant factor that separates Anti-Federalist Mery Otis Warren from Federalist James Madison is the perception they had over the citizens in their relation to the government. James Madison was concerned with the stability a republic could provide, while Mery Otis Warren wanted to ensure that the government was small, secure, and did not become to powerful or aristocratic. Raised by a wealthy family and very well educated, James Madison easily became a dominant figure in politics.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Americans’ rights and liberties are overtly expressed through the Bill of Rights. Federalists and Republicans possessed contradicting views of the same document, fueling debate. Key Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton intelligently reformed the American economy, eliminating the national debt. The Federalist Papers strategically expressed the movement’s motivations and ideals, thus bolstering support. More than 200 years later, the Federalist-Antifederalist debate comprised of the same key issues that face our nation…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The founding fathers of America fought the Revolutionary War to escape a system of full government control, to give power to the citizens. Yet, the government has slowly taken away this power of the citizens ever since, by imposing Acts that violate the Bill of Rights or reducing the strength of a common person’s vote. Americans envisioned a national government with explicit and restricted responsibilities, which pertained mainly to domestic tranquility. The founders of the nation did not create a Department of Education or Department of Housing and Urban Development. This was not an accident, they just never imagined a National government taking an active role in these activities.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Anti-Federalists ideas, compared to the Federalists, were overall correct. In September 2006, “The Antifederalists Were Right,” author Gary Galles illustrates the beliefs of the Antifederalists and how they were ultimately right about the rise of the vastly powerful government created by the constituition. During the begining of the article, Galles explains how the Antifederalists were opposed to approving the US Constitiution. The Antifederalists greates fear was the upbringing of an all-powerful central government that would not respect states rights. In the end, what the Antifederalists predicted turned out to be true in many aspects.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Founding Fathers on rights: Comparing the Federalists’ and Anti-Federalists’ views on rights, and what ended up in the Bill of Rights. In the year 1776, America was at the threshold of nationhood. There was debate and discussion about every aspect of this project because this new nation was a chance to change the things that the Founders disliked about the British rule. One of the divisive issues, was the necessity of the Bill of Rights.…

    • 4450 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Anti- Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty” (Bill of Rights Institute, "Bill of Rights of the United States of America…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists are who instated the foundation for what our country is. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had an opinions on how the nation should exist. However, the ideals of each group conflicted on multiple levels. Originally, the first draft for a constitution was established by the Articles of Confederation in 1778 (Kramnick, pg155). This was a document to draft laws for the newly independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the argument about the ratification of the United States Constitution, both the supporters and the opponents had substantial reasoning for their viewpoints. However, these groups differentiated greatly on what problems were most significant to their arguments. Each group came up with smaller “subgroups” of issues they had with the Constitution or Articles of Confederation. The supporting group of the Constitution was the Federalists, who believed in a strong central government that would better protect and support the new upcoming nation.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Prompt: Construct and develop your commentary using the assigned reading provided to you on authored by Dr. Michael Greve. “The AEI Federalism Project” is a program established by the American Enterprise Institute to provide a forum for the discussion of American Federalism. Your work should be an original interpretation of the content of the article and will address and answer the following: Develop an explanation for the principle of federalism, Address the concept of competitive federalism, Explain how federalism empowers citizens, Illustrate how federalism replicates private economic principles, Describe how mobility and choice relate to federalism, Discuss how federalism addresses the concerns of centralization, Provide an examination…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The bill of rights was telling the government that the people had personal freedom and a certain right that is limited and enforced. “It appears from these articles that there is no need of any intervention of the state governments, between the Congress and the people, to execute any one power vested in the general government, and that the constitution and laws of every state are nullified and declared void, so far as they are or shall be inconsistent with this constitution, or the laws made in pursuance of it, or with treaties made under the authority of the United States. — The government then, so far as it extends, is a complete one, and not a confederation“(Brutus I). Even though the bill of rights allows an individual to…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would allow for the government to do things that aren't listed within the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were opposed to this. They wanted a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Some examples of Anti-Federalists are George Mason and John Hancock. Anti-Federalists by definition are a political party that wanted the power of the individual state to be greater than the power of the central government, and a strict interpretation of the constitution promoted this.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays