Summary: The Process Of Sentencing

Decent Essays
Sentencing is the point in a criminal case, where the defendant has been found guilty, and now will be informed of the punishments they will face. Sentencing comes in two parts, first the judge decides what the sentence will be. In the case of a murder trial, the punishment will range from prison time ranging from several years to a life sentence. Additionally, in some states the death penalty may be a viable sentence for some cases. The second aspect of sentencing involves setting the conditions of the sentence. This includes things like probation, the length of prison time, and if a death penalty is selected, the method of execution will be chosen in this process. Defendants who are incarcerated, may receive parole during their prison stay.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The first article is written by Cyndy Caravelis, Ted Chiricos, and William Bales (2011) called “Static and Dynamic Indicators of Minority Treat in Sentencing Outcomes: A Multi-Level Analysis” and the second article is called “Sentencing with Discretion:Crack Cocaine Sentencing after Booker” by Ryan S. King and Marc Mauer in 2006. In addition, the last article is by Mona Lynch and Marisa Omori (2014) called “Legal Change and Sentencing Norms in the Wake of Booker: The Impact of Time and Place on Drug Trafficking Cases in Federal Court” from the Law and Society Review. Summary Caravelis, Chiricos, and Bales (2011) examines the “Habitual Offender” using a hierarchical generalized linear modeling to look at the direct effects of race using static…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Commerce law assessment task 3- Lachlan O’Malley Mandatory Sentencing in New South Wales 1. Mandatory Sentencing- a mandatory sentence is a court decision where legal discretion is limited by law. Most frequently, people convicted of certain crimes such as armed robbery or murder must be punished with at least a minimum number of years set in prison. 2.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A jury may also exercise the sentencing guidelines are usually imposed by the judge in most cases, but sentencing or it can be mandated by a statue; such as, mandatory prison sentence for certain crimes. There are various forms of sentences that are to be reviewed: concurrent and consecutive sentences, good time, sentencing sanctions, sentencing models, indeterminate sentences, determine sentences, structured sentences, feral sentencing guidelines, mandatory minimum sentences, and that of the three-strikes laws. The issue with concurrent and consecutive sentences is that concurrent sentences allow for than one sentence to be served at the same time as the others, while consecutive sentences only allow for one sentence to be served at a time, this is good in the case that there…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    My sentence for Steve would be community service, probation ,and home confinement. In the state of Ohio a third degree felony is punishable with a 1-5 year prison term and the maximum fine is $10,000. However, considering that Steve has no criminal record he would not get as harsh as a sentence if he did have a criminal record. I would give Steve more of a stern sentence because hazing seems to be a big issue on the campus. If complete leniency is given other people might continue to haze because they are not really getting punished.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Congress has granted the Sentencing Commission to conduct research and collect data collection. There instructions were to “develop means of measuring the degree to which the sentencing, penal, and correctional practices are effective in meeting the purposes of sentencing” (Barkow, 2013). Guidelines are limited because the only govern judges and parole officials but lack the appropriate regulations to govern prosecutorial discretion. Congress have been known to ignore findings provided by the Commission. Their recommendations fell on death’s ears when it came to the Commission proposing to eliminated the disparity between sentences for usage powdered and crack cocaine in in the mid 90’s.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harsh minimum sentencing practices around drug offences exist because of the Reagan administration’s rhetoric that blamed drugs as the primary cause of violent crime in the US during the 1980s. Prior to Reagan’s “War on Drugs” era, drug crime in the US was relatively minor, however, beginning in 1980, the number of prisoners in jail for drug related offences skyrocketed. While there were just 41,100 of these prisoners in 1980, by 2010 that number had tripled, an increase of 1,100%. One of the biggest reasons for this seemingly outrageous increase is mandatory minimums, a system devised to enact harsher sentences for first time offenders, with the goal of making them reluctant to commit the same crime again. In her book, The New Jim Crow, professor…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to federal and state courts their sentencing methods are different in away because federal courts deal with all federal crimes and the sentencing as well as the trial takes place in a federal court close to where the actual crime happen. Now in a federal court the judge uses a manual known as “The Federal Sentencing Guidelines” (avvo.com. n.d.). This helps them to calculate the penalties for a serious offense sentence. Unfortunately, this sentencing guideline cannot be used mandatorily; it is still used in helping make penalty considerations. Now in a state court penalties and sentencing are often guided by the state legislation.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Sentencing Guidelines took effect in November 1987, defendants across the country began filing constitutional challenges to the guidelines. By 1988, 200 district court judges would rule the guidelines unconstitutional while 120 would rule the opposite (Nagel, 1990). In an important ruling in 1989, the Supreme Court upheld their constitutionality in Mistretta v. United States where the sentencing crisis was resolved and marked an era of determinate sentencing for years to come. With over 200 district courts challenging the Guidelines in whole or in part based on alleged violation separation of powers, the due process rights of offenders and excessive-delegation arguments, it easily survived the constitutional scrutiny for the next…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Once they chose which crime they were punishing them with they had a rough estimate of how much prison or jail time a defendant could be facing (Gazal-Ayal p. 132). This has shifted the power of sentencing from the judge to the…

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fair Sentencing Case Study

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States NY Federal drug sentencing guidelines compel disproportionately harsh sentences with a primary focus on racial disparity among poor communities. Drug crimes account for 51% of the offenses in federal prison and of the 195,933 federal inmates 69.7% of those individuals are African Americans and Hispanics. That is nearly three quarters of the total prison population. This exhibits the racial disparity within the prison system. Studies from Rehavi of the University of British Columbia and professor at The University of Michigan explains that the racial gap and discrimination of African Americans to White Americans are due to mandatory minimum filings by the prosecutor; black males are twice as likely to be affected by these…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Impact of Race, class, and gender in Policing and Sentencing Race, class, and gender have an effect on the outcomes of the American criminal justice system. However, whether that outcome is favorable or not depends on where each individual lies on the race, class, and gender hierarchy of the United States. Cassia Spohn writes in great detail about the effects of these three characteristics in her article “30 Years of Sentencing Reform.” Before Spohn lays out the findings of her research, she differentiates disparity and discrimination. Disparity, she says, refers to difference in treatment or outcome.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Disparity In Sentencing

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aside from issues where the law is clear in what an officer “shall” do, the constraints may become more apparent in regards to the community’s perception of certain crimes, community demographics, and the officers themselves. I have experienced this with refugee communities, and it clearly affected how I exercised discretion. In some cases, it became a teaching moment on both the community and me as to what is acceptable behavior and what is not. Taking the time to realize that even though refugees receive some “training” before they arrive in the U.S., not everything is addressed, and assimilation takes time.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the early 1970's, a vast number of states transformed their sentencing protocol to new methods that seemed to be more structured as the concerns arose in the criminal justice system (Gregory & Leymon, 2010). Judicial discretion can impact determinate and indeterminate sentences as the power remains among the judge as to the severity of the sentence that will be carried out. " The forms of sentencing sanctions available to judges vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but generally include diversionary programs, fines, probation, intermediate sanctions, confinement in jail, incarceration in a state or federal prison, and the death penalty", (Siegel & Bartollas, 2014, p. 39).…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. The purposes of criminal punishment can simply be divided into two schools of thought: retributionists and preventionists. Identify, define, and discuss the several criminal law key term words that are associated with these two schools of thought and conclude with your opinion of which is the most effective.....or why all are concurrently effective. Be thorough since this is important concerning the purposes of punishment in a modern society. 1.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are multiple stages of the criminal court process that create a burden of proof that contribute to criminal justice investigations. Every court process begins with a crime allegedly committed to determining its legal status. Law enforcement and detectives determine if the crime was illegal or legal due to the investigations. They investigate a crime by interviewing victims, witnesses, and suspects. They also gather physical evidence by taking pictures, fingerprint, and DNA samples.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays