Criminal Court Process Analysis

Improved Essays
There are multiple stages of the criminal court process that create a burden of proof that contribute to criminal justice investigations. Every court process begins with a crime allegedly committed to determining its legal status. Law enforcement and detectives determine if the crime was illegal or legal due to the investigations. They investigate a crime by interviewing victims, witnesses, and suspects. They also gather physical evidence by taking pictures, fingerprint, and DNA samples. The investigation provides police with a great opportunity to collect any attainable evidence and reconstruct a timeline and reenactment of the crime (Hartzell, n.d). The criminal court process is created to provide justice and protection for each member …show more content…
This hearing determines if there is sufficient evidence that exists against an offender to continue the criminal justice process. The judge in this step searches for a probable cause to prove a crime was committed and the suspect accomplished doing so. Nevertheless, if a probable cause is determined, the accused suspect is held for trial on the information, which results in formal charging. In federal cases and other states, there is a grand jury that is empanelled to determine if there is enough evidence to file indictment charges against the suspect with the crimes. However if the grand jury finds there is sufficient evidence to warrant a trial it issues a true bill, if not it issues a no bill and he or she is filtered out of the criminal justice network (Appalachian State University, n.d). The burden of proof at the preliminary hearing or grand jury is the weight of evidence. In this step, the judge or grand jury determines if there are enough facts necessary to determine a probable …show more content…
Also, there must be a legal basis for the appeal such as alleged material error in the trial, despite not because the losing party did not agree with the verdict. If the defendant was convicted through the plea bargain then the right of appealing is demolished. Any convicted offenders are able to appeal their case based on the matter of law. When there is an appeal, the court reviews the case looking at the previous proceedings in the lower courts and will not consider new evidence. The appellate courts look at the record and the written briefs filed by the defendant and the prosecutor of the appeal. The appellant will file a second brief in response to the prosecutor’s position and may hear oral arguments before reaching a decision. The burden of proof depends on previous evidence of the plaintiff’s previous evidence, as the appeal court cannot use new evidence in the attempt to appeal.
Each stage of the criminal court process uses evidence in different ways to create a burden of proof that contributes to criminal justice investigations. Every step of the process describes different approaches to proving innocence or guilt of the defendant. Law enforcement and the court system to help protect members of society by convicting, punishing, and rehabilitating people who have done illegal matters. With the help of each step, the criminal justice

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The second is law making. “At least in common law countries, appellate judges decide cases that provide precedents to guide decisions in future cases” (Drahozal, 2011). This is one reason why appeals are needed to ensure the defendant is not a victim of the courts errors. If the defendant can prove the trial court did in fact make a legal error or errors, or they were denied due process of the law, or the right to a fair trail was not met, it could result in a retrial…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second, is the burden of proof required to assign guilt. In civil case the plaintiff needs to show a civil wrong was committed, and that the preponderance of evidence shows the defendant is guilty of the issue in dispute. Basically this means, the plaintiff needs to prove it is more likely than not the defendant is guilty. Criminal cases require the jury to find the defendant guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. Beyond these differences the process’ are very similar.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The next step is the bail or bond stage. The judge will determine if the offender is a flight risk, drug use, violent behavior, and weigh his or her ties with the community. If the accused is deemed a flight risk or too violent to be released on bail then bail may be denied. At the preliminary hearing a grand jury will hear all of the evidence that is brought against the offender. They will then determine if there is enough evidence to go to trial.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Main Juror Jury Functions

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The court officials need the proper person to remember all the testimonies and evidence obtained so a fair verdict could be given (Gardner and Anderson, 2010). The last thing the Justice System wants is to have a mistrial. In other words, a mistrial is likely if it 's later determined the Juror pool consisted of impaired people. The last and final principle that will eliminate a person from a capital case is if it 's determined that the judge treated a mentally incapable person unfairly (Gardner and Anderson, 2010). Even if the person 's…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The prosecutor is a lawyer who represents the government and they are responsible for making the decision whether to charge someone with a crime. The first thing the prosecutor looks for is a sound case, because in some situations you have cases that have legal problems that could get the case thrown out of court. Example if the police officer violated the defendants’ rights while looking for evidence then that evidence would be inadmissible. Also the prosecutor needs to figure out if there is enough supporting evidence to have a higher probability of a conviction. “The duty of a public prosecutor is to present the case against an accused person by bringing all the evidence that is necessary and available, and presenting it in the best…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Within this essay there will be sereval topics and explanations about what forensic psychology can offer to the comprehension of wrongdoing. Criminal forensic psychology is the application of methods, theories and findings from a wide variety of areas in psychology to the settings and worries of criminal and civil justice. The settings in which forensic psychologists’ work include the police, the courts, prisons, secure units, hospitals, probations and other community based services and finally academia (Towl, Farrington, Crighton & Hughes, 2008). Offender profiling, also known as criminal information gathering, is an investigative tool used by police, services businesses or government units, to identify likely and carefully study patterns…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Jury Decision Making Essay

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Juror Decision-making Processes When the justice system brings a criminal case to trial, a defendant has a right to judgement by their peers, called jurors in the court system. Anyone accused of committing a crime is extended this right. The jurors cast a judgement called a verdict. Studying verdict outcomes is a prominent subject for…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In module one, I learned many different subjects that I’ve always wanted to learn about. For example, I learned that criminology is the study of all crimes, which include, criminals, crime victims, illegal theory and or deviant behavior, social reaction to crimes and criminals, effectiveness of anti-crime policies, and the broader political territory of social control. Basically criminology explains it all, from the crime to the victims or policies related to the crime. The history of law gave me an understanding on how society is dependent upon law impose by some superior command. New information I gather was that society cannot exist without law.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Preliminary hearings are conducted after an individual has been arraigned in the court. It is a process where the judge determines whether there is enough evidence for the case to be presented. Using a legal standard known as probable cause, the judge determines whether the government has provided substantial evidence that can reasonably convince a jury of the fact that the defendant has committed the crimes in question (Montemayor, 2014). A suspect is entitled to a preliminary hearing to ensure that he or she is protected from irrational arrest and detention. Therefore, substantial evidence must be provided to hold the defendant for trial.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If there is no evidence, then the suspect should be held, but still be given a trial in order to prove him or herself innocent. 2. Under what circumstances would a defendant be wise to settle out of court? Explain To avoid unnecessary fees, stress, and for privacy reasons, a defendant would be wise to settle out of court. When settled out of court, details to a case could be left private which is good if the defendant does not want people to know about their case.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays