Summary Of Genghis Khan And The Making Of The Modern World By Jack Weatherford

Superior Essays
In Genghis Khan and the making of the modern world, Jack Weatherford argues that despite villainization by historians Genghis khan rose from a remote tribal culture to unify the mongols as conquerors who promoted cultural communication, trade, and legal rights in one of the largest empires in history.The author asks how Genghis Khan became an influential ruler, how he conquered a huge amount of land, and how he left a legacy and contribution to modern society. The Mongols spread revolutionary ideas of culture and civilization throughout Asia, in an empire created by Genghis Khan. Yet, he and the Mongols were portrayed in a false version of history that as the author points out largely demonizes the Mongols. The Mongols increased trade and communication across Asia, while Europe was still backlogged in superstition. Mongol …show more content…
With this unified identity they stopped battling each other over minor disagreements, and instead worked together under Genghis Khan's leadership to conquer. He was an extremely effective fighter, adapting techniques from all over Asia to use in his military. The Mongols had a uniform code of laws, ridding the steppes of theft, kidnapping and petty battles.He established religious toleration and meritocracy. Previously Mongols tribes judged based on birth. He forbid The Mongols to abduct and enslave one another, recognizing the harmful animosity it created. Stealing animals was a capital offense as herding was an essential component of Mongol life. Genghis Khan also established a set hunting period, giving animals between March and October to breed in safety. He named the new Mongol nation Yeke Mongol Ulus, the Great Mongol

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Historians believe that the mongol invasion of europe and asia brought about positive as well as negative consequences. One way they should this is by the mongols tricking their enemies. In passage one it says they told their enemy that they surrender and waited till they all came out of their castle to slaughter everybody they saw.this supports my thesis because it shows that they tricked people a lot.so by doing that they cant help each other because they could just think the mongols are trying to trick them so they won't believe them and won't help them do anything. In passage two it says a good thing they did was introduce trade and help make trading routes.when the mongols made routes to trade on they allowed people to get goods they couldn't get where they live and it helped spread culture and religions to other parts of the world.while the road was new it started a period of peace called pax mongolia.with the new trails they opened up hospitals and orphanages.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were people from Central Asia who came together to establish an empire which lasted from 1206 CE to 1368 CE. They were herdsmen and tradesmen who herded sheep and goats, and were nomadic people. Even though at first the Mongol community was small, they were able to expand by conquering China, Persia, and Russia. The Mongols were culturally destructive and constructive to a moderate extent in Persia during the 13th century because they positively influenced academics while they subjugated agriculture.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that the Mongols were barbaric and very destructive and unforgiving people. Although they were barbaric, they united Eurasia and spread ideas and were very intelligent. One reason why they were barbaric is how they ruled in battle. While they were in battle, the Mongols had one person in charge of 10 warriors and then one person in charge of 10 of those groups of ten (100) and then ten of those ten (1000) and genghis would tell only a few people what to do and it would be a chain reaction of how the orders went around to everyone. If only a few people flee from battle out of a ten person group, the whole entire group is sIaughtered.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Mongols ruled much of the Asian continent from 1206 to 1368. The impact that the Mongols had on the world was very strong. According to document 1 in the DBQ, more than double the amount of land conquered by Alexander the Great was conquered by the Mongols loyal ruler, Genghis Khan. Cruel and intelligent battle strategies created many different effects.. The Mongolians of the Asian Steppe had a positive impact on the world during their rule of the Asian continent from 1206 to 1368 by influencing the unification of China, many laws, and the Silk Road.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The society and the way of life of the Mongols was civilized, the opposite of how they conquered. Their postal service is just one example their sophisticated civilization. When a messenger would set out on a trail with information he would only have to ride his horse 25 miles until he would reach a post, where fresh horses…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    DBQ On Modern Day Mongols

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Modern Day Mongols ~ The Mongols could be your worst nightmare destroying your village and killing all your family and friends or your best friend keeping you safe and making sure you had everything you needed but thats depending on whose side you were on. The Mongols were somewhat barbaric warriors that lived in the 13th century and took over most of Asia, The Middle East and Eastern Europe using barbaric Tactics. Even though the Mongols had barbaric tendencies they also protected their own. The Mongols were barbaric because they were an army that killed without remorse. They served the heads of the slain from their bodies and heaped them up in piles {Document 4}.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adolf Hitler Comparison

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing Two Men in History The two people I have chosen to compare are Adolf Hitler and Genghis Khan because they are both people who did bad things that affect many people, and did things that lead to war, and involved killing a bunch of people, both ended up dead or being killed for what they did. Adolf Hitler was born in Austria on April 20, 1889 and then when he was three years old he and his family had moved to Germany, and from 1933-1945 he was the chancellor and was dictator from 1934-1945 (Adolf Hitler Biography, Bio.com). At the outbreak of World War 1 he actually applied for military service in the German army, and even though he wasn’t on the frontlines he did participate in many battles and had got injured in the battle…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mongols Dbq Essay

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The actions of the Mongols affected many societies both positively and negatively. Mongol invasions may have disrupted civilizations, but they also helped improve the world network as a whole. A powerful ruler, or khan, and probably the most important Mongol khan, was Chinggis Khan. Chinggis Khan was born in the 1770s as Temujin in a splinter clan. His father was an able leader, and he promised a marriage between his oldest son, Temujin, and a stronger chief’s daughter.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Empires

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Already having trouble with food because of the lower temperatures, the trade reduction had an even greater effect on the Mongols. By cause of these problems, Genghis Khan was more easily able to unite the people of Mongolia telling them the only way to survive is by joining together. After convincing many of the tribal leaders of this, he dispersed members of each tribe into different groups or units so they were exposed to the people of the other tribes. The units of men that were placed in the army were trained to fight using military strategy developed by Genghis Khan. “Their tactics exploited their abilities with archery and their mobility: They usually stayed out of reach of their opponents' weapons and used hit-and-run tactics in waves…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genghis Khan Dbq

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Genghis Khan is often depicted as a barbarian and a bloodthirsty leader, bringing fear in every city he went, but people only focus on the negatives and don’t see that maybe he did more good than harm. Genghis Khan helped bring along the Mongol Peace, which lasted from the mid 1200s to the mid 1300s (The Mongol Conquests). During this time there was stability and law and order throughout the Empire. This of course led to more trade between Europe and Asia, which would help the Mongolian Empire to acquire more allies (Genghis Khan BBC Video). Without the Mongol Peace, wars could have been a lot more common and the Mongols would have been a lot weaker since they wouldn’t have had as much allies to help them out.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Mongols were a nomadic group of people that originated in Central Asia. The leader, Genghis Khan, organized the people and used superb military tactics to conquer others and eventually established the largest empire in the world to this day. The Mongols controlled most of the Middle East and adopted many of the Muslim Empire’s techniques for success mainly influencing society, while varying aspects of their government. However, Islam continued to grow and influence society even under Mongol control and after it as well. The empire spanned from China to East of Turkey in the West, and from Russia in the North to Tibet in the South.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Given its military prowess, the Mongol Empire was able to stretch its territory to an extraordinary level--the four corners of the border were marked by Poland, Egypt, Java, and Japan. (Weatherford 214) The empire covered most of Asia and tiny parts of Europe and Africa. Despite the suffering from the warfare, the areas under the Mongol rule “were able to enjoy a unprecedented century of political peace with a commercial, technological, and intellectual explosion unlike any in prior history.” (Weatherford 214)…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: How Barbaric were the "Barbarians"? Although Mongols were strikingly ruthless through their military tactics (Doc. 2, 3,4,5), they were able to develop a rather sophisticated society (Doc. 7, 9, 10) and executed noteworthy and structured accomplishments (Doc. 1, 6, 8). As shown in documents 2, 3, 4, and 5, the Mongolians are quite infamous for their questionable harshness considering their military techniques.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols and the Europeans had many characteristics that were similar and characteristics that set them apart. They both had strong attributes that set them apart from any other group of people; they were powerful in their own way. It was the Mongols during the third wave civilizations era that created the largest and influential empire of that millennium. Their empire reached all the way to Eastern Europe and it was the Mongols that brought regions together into a single interacting network. The Comparing and contrasting of two expansive cultures will provide us with a better understand of how their connection pushed us into the global integration of the modern era.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    With his extraordinary military accomplishments and leadership skills, Genghis Khan was a warrior and ruler who united all the nomadic tribes in the steppe of Mongolia and built the largest land empire in the world in the thirteenth century. He left a great legacy through his innovative ideas and laws whilst also promoting religious freedom, allowing an exchange of the global economy between Asia and Europe (Weatherford). However, with a belief that there should be only one ruler under the sky, Genghis Khan was unlikely to forgive those who refused to join forces with him and vanquished millions who wanted to create empires of their own. This presented an image of him and the Mongols as brutal savages who eliminated entire cultures, devastated…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays