Socialism: The Greediest Ideology

Great Essays
Socialism: The Greediest Ideology
One of the most fundamental questions to ask when determining an operable economic system is how much should the federal government get involved in the daily lives of its citizens. To some, the finest, most unsurpassed economic system is a free market capitalist based system; one that contains very little government involvement in personal economic choice. To others, a social market based system with varying amounts of government involvement is a much more viable choice. Many people today make the assumption that socialism, whether it be democratic or not, is an indefectible way of how our state and economy should function. Many advocates for socialism favor its ability to maintain income inequality, and
…show more content…
Influenced by the economic principle of “Laissez Faire”, capitalism is not a set ideology like socialism. Capitalism is a reflection of the overall idea of liberty. Capitalism allows the consumer to have full control on what gets produced by society, without the influence of any government bureaucracy. It has been proven by a great deal of economists that lowering government intervention and eliminating the dependency on the government through a welfare state will help stabilize and increase economic growth and prosperity in a nation (LePage 133). Many challengers of capitalism tend to bring up the fact that inequality is never addressed when capitalism is put into practice. People seem to forget that inequality also a major problem under socialism as well. As seen in one of the longest running socialist states, China, inequality is still seen as a major problem, as many Chinese bureaucrats are getting richer, while the private business sector shrinks on all levels, whether it be on the corporate level or the small business level ( Feng/Yu 225). It is considerably ironic that an ideology that advocates the fight against income inequality through the use of government intervention has government officials with a bigger salary than the private …show more content…
This is incentivized to the common individual through the promise of free, government-issued, programs, such as universal healthcare, or upper education. People always seem to forget that through this government intervention in order to provide you with said free stuff always requires some form of force, mainly through steeper taxes, as seen in democratic socialism (LePage 141). As great as free healthcare and education sounds, nothing is ever truly considered free, as your taxes are surely to go up under the platform of democratic socialism. The quality of these things also goes down when the government gets involved. Healthcare in a country that consists of mainly privatized plans (The United States), typically has higher survival rates for serious injury and disease (LePage 143). A majority of the best schools in the world also tend to find their way to the United States, where college education is paid for by the individual, rather than the government. Democratic Socialism tends to have cures for particular issues in society caused by free market principles, but these cures are typically overrun by the poorer quality of socialist incentives, such as universal healthcare and free education, as well as the problems that are brought with traditional socialism,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Advantages Of Socialism

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The main economic strategies are based on the market and include more government control than socialism. This is the best advantages of socialism because when the economic crisis was coming, the government could adjust the macro-control policies and introduced a series of initiatives to expand domestic demand and promote economic development. It achieved success quickly and efficiency. But, socialism is easy to establish monopoly enterprise. These companies are controlled by government and supported by a lot of government policies, they have no competition inside the country.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx Vs Adam Smith

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages

    One major differences between the two are that they both have extremely opposite views on how an economy should be run. Adam Smith believes in capitalism and free markets where the government has little to no control which in other words is known as, Laissez-Faire. Whereas Karl Marx believes in socialism and trusts that the economy is best run when the government has control on all aspects of an economy and were wealth is shared out equally amongst the public. Another difference between the two theorists are their opinions on how the production should be processed. Adam Smith advocates that division of labour and specialisation is the finest way to produce goods as firms can become extremely efficient and produce numerous more goods in a day as the production is divided into various parts.…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Economic Freedom Imagine a world where capitalism was the only ideology. What would it look like? Well, in general, there would be little to no governmental intervening or help given to the people and all businesses would be run and maintained by the citizens instead of the government. However, there are some problems with this totally capitalistic world, especially with corruption involved. To avoid these problems, a socialist view can be inputted instead of capitalist.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A significant difference from capitalism is, socialism has a great deal of involvement from the government in its economic system. The positive of that being that with the government involvement is the stability that comes along with the government in business. The government owns many of the factories, which is also another benefit for the consumers, because unlike the predictability of the market the government is less likely to crash. The downfall of this being that it does not allow for much private property for citizens; therefore, it limits the options for business to mainly what the government owns. Leonard Reed was an economist against socialism because he believed “the absence of governmental or any other coercive master-minding—then one will possess an absolutely essential ingredient for freedom: a faith in free people” as said in his piece I, Pencil.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Effects of Goverment Intervention Within Economy Source one is a direct quote from Milton Friedman illustrating his perspective and opinion on the market economy. Within the quote, Friedman is directly voicing his belief that the only logical way for an economy to be ran is through means of private ownership and investment. In his mind, interference from the government only disables the everyday consumer from living in what he thinks should be a free society. Within his quote he states, “Nobody spends somebody else’s money as carefully as he spends his own. Nobody uses somebody else’s resources as carefully as he uses his own.” With this statement, Friedman is implying that the government has no right to dictate how consumer’s money and…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Currently, the world is profoundly segregated on the issue of economic systems. Divided on the issue, people are supporting capitalism, socialism or a mix of both. In fact, there are no pure capitalist or socialist systems. Pure capitalism, the existence of free market, is the perfect system for the prosperity of individuals, communities and the nation as a whole. People who work so hard do not have the responsibility to pay others bills.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This invisible hand would keep up the market without government intervention, supporting Locke’s idea that the government existed only to protect the rights of the people, not to intervene with economy. He promoted the idea of reasonable self-interest, which is the foundation of our economy, including our stock market. This self interest is the driver that keeps up the economy, when everyone is looking out for only their personal gain. Despite some objections to capitalism in America, such as that it benefits the privileged few and discourages local production, capitalism has remained the base of our economy, albeit a turbulent one. Ultimately, capitalism has founded the typical “American dream”, starting from humble beginnings and working hard to make it big, and this enabler of the American dream was huge turning point in economic philosophy.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capitalism engenders economic freedom, growth and efficiency, however, it also creates a monopoly of power and marked class divisions. Communism removes the barriers of class distinctions and gives equal opportunities for employees; however, it removes the natural drive for ambition and stifles industrial growth. “The most powerful single force in the world today is neither Communism nor capitalism, neither the H-bomb nor the guided missile—it is man’s eternal desire to be free and independent” (John F. Kennedy,…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments for the economic policy change include that an economy that is severely money-oriented neglects their citizen’s needs, and mandates that in order to be respected, loved, worthy, and in order to keep yourself and your family alive in general, you must possess a piece of green paper, only worthy of anything because we told you so. Paul le Blanc addressed the socialist views in his essay “The Absence of Socialism in America”, by calling the “class antagonism” a contradiction to the capitalist system. Instead of giving everyone opportunity, as it’s pure theories would do, American capitalism is giving opportunity to a select few, and neglecting the majority of its nation. Currently, Europe has many successful socialist countries who focus on the needs of their citizens, proving itself to be better for the individual than capitalism. The majority of these countries have ranked drastically higher than the United States in their science, math and reading scores.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They think a Socialist society makes people have no initiative, and will not work for what they want. In Micheal Moore’s movie Sicko, shows many cases where people apply for health related procedures or medications and get denied. The insurance companies explanations are the persons health conditions are to severe or a procedure was experimental so it did not qualify them for coverage. With all the denial letters being sent out, it was making the rich richer, and the poor are losing their lives just so the companies do not lose money. The “haves” are not even giving the “have nots” access to medical help, they want to be as rich as they can, even if a person suffers for it.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays