The Controversy Over The Use Of Stem Cells

Improved Essays
Thousands of people are treated with stem cells every year in the United States. Stem cells are used in many different ways to better the world and save lives. People debate whether or not it is ethically okay to use stem cells for research. The government is funding this research, so the benefits most likely outweigh the moral issues.
There are a few unique properties that all stem cells share. One unique property is that stem cells are unspecialized. They do not have tissue-specific structures and are pluripotent. This means that stem cells can become almost any other type of body cell. Another unique property of stem cells is that they can divide and renew themselves for long periods of time. The stem cells are placed in a lab to replicate
…show more content…
An argument that is in favor of stem cell research is that blastocysts under a week old are not developed into humans yet. An embryo isn 't considered a human until it is at least two weeks old. The benefits of stem cell research are also greater than ethical issues. Also, research will continue with or without government funding, so the government should fund this live saving research (Pros and Cons).
There are also many arguments against stem cell research. People argue that destroying embryos is also destroying innocent lives. Stem cells should only be used from babies that were aborted. Abortion isn 't a good thing, but at least the unborn babies will have somewhat of a purpose in life. A lot of taxpayers don 't think their money should be going towards something that they all don 't agree with.
My personal opinion on stem cell research is that it should be allowed and funded by the government. If I had a fatal disease that was curable or treatable with stem cells, I would be really glad that they did the research to save my life. I don 't think stem cells taken from embryos is considered destroying life. The embryos are not developed into human form, and therefore are used in research to save lives (Pros and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Is Human Cloning Possible

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As Sagan illustrates in the article, “Human cloning possible but remains ‘abhorrent’ in minds of public”, “cloning could harm the babies created.” These babies could be affected by deformities or diseases. Having deformities and diseases means that the babies would suffer and not live very long. These babies are only alive because of our experiments. Due to being experiments, they would not be able to live a normal life because of their health problems. Instead of creating clones that have to experience the effects of the imperfections, scientists should focus more on improving the lives of people by using other ways that does not include ethics or does not cause harm to others.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stem Cell Controversy

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Scientists are able to take a single cell from a very early staged embryo and develop a new line without destroying the embryo. Religion is very important to a large part of society and can affect many people’s opinions on certain topics just like it does for stem cell research. A lot of people think that their religion is against the process of stem cell research. What people don’t know is that the church only disagrees with one method of stem cell research. The church doesn’t agree with the system where embryos are destroyed because they believe the process kills a life.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments have been made stating that cloning could save lives, but it would jeopardize many more than it would save the scientists from the article “The Cloning Debate. Should All Forms Of Human Cloning Be Banned?” State “Many experts say reproductive cloning is grossly unethical because it jeopardizes the health of would-be child clones. They note that efforts to clone sheep, pigs, goats and other animals yield few live births, and that many live-born mammal clones die within weeks or months because of abnormalities.” If humans were to reproduce through cloning we would have very little success and the children would not live for very long. Why…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some prolife people say that the potential life killed by an abortion could have ended up finding the cure for cancer, or the future president of the United States. This argument is not a fair one because keeping a baby that would otherwise be unborn only does more harm than good. Also, rather than coming up with theoretical future for a life that has not even been born and that may not even exist, put the enthusiasm and hopes in the children that already are alive. Also, one may say that the future of value argument does not apply if the person continues to live after the matter. But the most important life in this situation is the living human being and their experiences and goals and that should be protected at all costs.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ESCR (embryonic stem cell research) is argued to be a motive that is unfair as well as the debate on whether it should be declared illegal due to the possible death, pain and unfair treatment to all involved ("Ten Problems with Embryonic Stem Cell Research."). It explains the reasons and beliefs of the other party. An additional concern of the opposing part is that fact that, "Humans should not be trying to play God and some argue that stem cell research in the far future can lead to knowledge on how to clone humans. It is hard to say whether this is true, but we have seen devastating consequences of other research-programs, even with good intentions, such as nuclear research (Stem Cell Research-Pros and Cons). The quote explains the human fear behind the matter of stem cell research.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There was buzz around this discovery because of all the potential stem cells have in curing disease. The controversy is over the morality of destroying human embryos. Many believe it is not right to create a human life and destroy it even if it will be used to help others. Others are debating when a group of cells actually becomes human or is technically alive. Some believe that a fetus is not alive until it is born while others believe life begins at conception.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proponents of the idea say that cloning could lead to more disease resistant plants, but, this very creation could cause lack of DNA diversity. So, cloning should not be allowed because because people are still very conflicted on the subject, also the cost of cloning is too extreme and, it would lack in DNA diversity. First of all, cloning is still very new to the world. Although cloning has been around since Dolly the Sheep, the whole world is still conflicted on the subject. Some feel that the cloning of embryos, is morally repugnant and may feel that the idea of cloning humans is “playing God” according to “What are the Pros and Cons of Cloning?” So, if too many people are conflicted based on a moral stance, it will create too much turmoil in the science community.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stem Cell research has been advancing a lot in recent years and there have been many discoveries that have aided in furthering the research about cancer and how to cure it. They are the next big breakthrough in science and show a promising future. With enough time and research, scientists will be able to utilize stem cells in a way that will be beneficial to cancer patients. Cancer is known as a group of diseases involving abnormal cell growth that has the potential to spread or invade to other parts of the body. “Cancer can start almost anywhere in the human body, which is made up of trillions of cells.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They say the earlier you get your abortion the less harder it would be to actually do the abortion. Even though most people think abortion is wrong because they are killing a living human if you get the abortion quick enough the baby isn’t actually living but most people don’t know that and still think it’s wrong to have an abortion.This quote proves the thesis by saying that the longer you wait to get the abortion the harder the surgery would be to do because if you were to get the abortion early then it wouldn’t be as dangerous and it wouldn’t be considered killing a living human being because it takes up to 16-17 weeks before the baby is considered fully alive. Even though most people think that having an abortion is…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another difference is that each type of stem cell plays a certain role. Adult stem cells uphold and repair the tissue that the stem cells originated from (“Stem Cell Basics”). Embryonic stem cells have the potential to form almost any type of cell that is found in a human body (Yu). In addition, stem cells can proliferate for a certain amount of time depending on the type of stem cell. Proliferation is the “continuous division of single cells into two identical daughter cells” (“Stem Cell Basics”).…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays