Stanford Milgram Experiment Analysis

Improved Essays
The Stanford prison experiment was similar to the Milgram experiment because they both focused on the responses of people when there are underneath authority. Zimbardo was interested in what would happen when you would put good people in an evil place. He also focused on if the situation out of the institution can control your behavior or would your attitude and values overcome the situation from the negative environment. For Zimbardo negative environment, he had created a mock prison in the basement of the Stanford Univeristy psychology building. He advertised college students to play the role of guards and prisoners. In the study, he manages to find a group of male college students to participate in his experiment. The students were paid …show more content…
The guards begin to harass the prisoners. The guards would think of degrading ways to make the prisoner feel bad about their selves. The prisoners were constantly insulted and giving irrelevant orders. The prisoners soon begin to fall into their roles as prisoners. When the prisoners had become more obedient to the guards, the guards become more hostile and forceful. One prisoner the ring leader of the rebellious begins to act out and misbehaves towards the guards. He could no longer handle the prisoner role and decided he wanted to leave. But was asked to stay and see if things would change. He had thought that was a way of them keeping him there so he could not leave, so he went back and told the other prisoners that they could not escape. He then begins to act out as if he was having a mental breakdown. He would then burst out screaming, crying and anger. He was then released from the monk prison. Zimbardo then asked another male student to join his experiment. The new male student saw what was happing in the monk prison and soon wanted to leave, but was told he could not leave. He then began to act out and decides to go on a hungry strike. When the study went to an end on the fifth day because of one psychologist thoughts of the prisoners, who felt that they were being abused by the guards and that it was terrible what Zimbardo were doing to the …show more content…
Such as when he made the prisoners strip to humiliate them. He failed to protect his participants that were prisoners. He did not given the prisoners any sense of comfort. The prisoners were not protected from psychological harm that was created in the monk prison. Even though he did protect their identity the participants lost their sense of personal identity because of the uniforms they wore. He did not set boundaries between the guards and prisoners to believe what was real and make believe. He had allowed the guards to take their frustrations out on the prisoners. He also lied to one of his participants who no longer wanted to participate in his experiment that the experiment was over. Instead he moved his research to another place in the same building to protect his experiment, even though he knew what he was doing was wrong. He allowed one of his guards to do their own study by seeing how far someone would go If there are verbally abused. Zimbrado also only projected his experiment to only males and not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The different, more psychological behavior of the prisoners…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Zimbardo wanted to see how quickly the guards would adapt to their role as actual prison guards and assert their authority and dominance on the prisoners. He saw that they adapted too quickly; they developed the “authoritarian personality” (pg. 231). The prison guards tormented the prisoners so much that Zimbardo had to end the experiment after one week instead of…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How does having power corrupt people? Having power can corrupt people in manys, such as what happen in The Well by Ira Sher and what happen in The Stanford Prison Experiment by Saul McLeod. In the article The Stanford Prison Experiment, Philip Zimbardo had constructed an experiment to confirm what might cause a guard to have brutality against a prisoner and that’s just what Zimbardo had done. In the article it says, “Within hours of beginning the experiment some guards began to harass prisoners”.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They had to do the real life process of a guard and go to there house arrest them. So then the guards started to abuse them and they went almost started to go through deep depression. The prisoners started screaming, crying, and etc. Those are the stages.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe they experience more unethical issues than Milgram’s. The prisoners wasn’t protected from psychological harm. If it’s just an experiment, why should people become emotionally distressed and humiliated? One prisoner had to be released after one day because of a mental breakdown. Also, Zimbardo wasn’t aware of other things that was going on.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This came at cost with the catastrophic effects the experiment brought on the participants. The Stanford prison Experiment is noted as a “classic experiment in the psychology of human behavior (Onishi & Herbert, 2016). In this experiment, Professor Phillip Zimbardo wanted to study the effects of labels and…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A basement was turned into a mock prison, and hired students to be the guards and prisoners. The prisoners were grabbed at their homes by the guards and brought in and treated like real criminals to keep the experiment as real as possible. The guards worked in groups of threes for eight hour shifts and then switched. Zimbardo monitored everything and acted as the prison's warden, both the prisoners and guards adapted quickly to their new found roles. Within hours some guards started acting in a brutal and sadistic manner, and soon after more joined in.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Evil In Lord Of The Flies

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The prisoners were treated as a real inmate would be, they wore uniforms, ate prison food, and slept in cells. On the other hand the guards wore reflective sunglasses, uniforms, and conducted daily activity in the “prison”. This experiments effects set into place so quickly that what was meant to last for two weeks only lasted six days due to the extreme effects on both the prisoners and the guards. In an interview with The New York Times Magazine Zimbardo states, “They start off playing a game, and then there is a point at which they each, one by one, flip and become more and more extreme.” (Zimbardo).…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Zimbardo Prison Experiment

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Finally, the environment was crafted to be brutal. The guards and prisoners may have reacted differently in a less brutal environment. "BBC study in December, 2001, two psychologists, Stephen Reicher and Alexander Haslam, tried to find out. They worked with the documentaries unit of the BBC to partially recreate Zimbardo ’s setup over the course of an eight-day experiment….Soon, more prisoners began to challenge the guards.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marianne Szegedy-Maszak, author of "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism," states that everyone is subjected to be a possible torturer (Szegedy-Maszak 76). Szegedy-Maszak asserts, the "unconscionable acts" committed by the Abu Ghraib were likely caused by "the anxiety and helplessness" of their horrific living conditions (Szegedy-Maszak 76). Philip G. Zimbardo, author of "The Stanford Prison Experiment," attempts to clarify the reasoning and motivation behind the sadistic acts in situations similar to the Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal. Zimbardo conducted a study where twenty-one male college students were paid fifteen dollars a day to participate in a, "mock prison," to study the psychological behavior projected from a simulated prison…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘Prisoners’ on the other hand, lost their own identity in the process of becoming a ‘prisoner’. They lost sight of their own uniqueness and become like other ‘prisoners’. The also lost all sense of control because they felt unsure of how to react to the ‘guards’ and be perceived as defiant, and therefore be exposed to aggression from the ‘guards’. Finally, the loss of control within the mock prison, led them to realize they never want to lose power and control and therefore, they strive to gain control back in their lives…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to obtain candidates for the experiment, an advertisement was placed in the newspaper for anyone who wanted to participate in the study of how life was in prison. Seventy-five men were interviewed for the roles, but of those seventy-five, only twenty-four were chosen. They were selected at random to take and perform the roles of either prison guards or inmates. The experiment was meant to last two weeks’ time, but at the end of just six days, it was apparent that it should come to a close. Phil Zimbardo, the conductor of this experiment, was a teacher of psychology at the university.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Because he was the third prisoner to show symptoms of distress this severe, Zimbardo was suspicious of him and concluded that he was faking to be able to leave like the previously released prisoners. After “browbeating” the prisoner into staying, he left to get food. While he was away, the prisoners lined up, chanting, "Prisoner #819 is a bad prisoner. Because of what Prisoner #819 did, my cell is a mess, Mr. Correctional Officer,’" a dozen times (Zimbardo). In the photo, he is curled into a ball on the ground in tears, hearing the chanting.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted in 1971 by researcher, Philip Zimbardo is one of the most eye-opening social studies done to this day. It’s purpose was to find out more about how the social principles of obedience and conformity can affect the behavior of a normal human being. Zimbardo wanted to discover how social customs and hierarchy affect the roles people play, in a prison setting (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866). Though their purpose seems praiseworthy, the experiment itself was not. It was filled with ethical violations and in just 6 days, spun out of control (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But the guards won’t let the prisoners tell their parents that they are being tortured and beaten. The guards had the prisoners write letters to their parents but they never shipped the letters out so none of the letters got to their parents. The guards got so mean and rude to the prisoners that they started to have mental breakdowns because they started to I believe that they were in prison. This caused The Stanford Prison Experiment to end after 6 days instead of lasting 2 weeks. This experiment affected the prisoners so much that those prisoners had to get a therapist to help them with their problem.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays