St. Thomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument

Improved Essays
According to St. Thomas Aquinas the cosmological argument and teleological argument as stated in the “Kalam” basically states “that everything that begins to exist has a cause of existence, the universe began to exist, therefore, the universe has a cause of its existence.” This basically means that that everything happens for a reason. In my opinion I completely agree with this logic. With the way that the world is today the must be some type of Ultimate Reality (God) that has plans for us as human beings. With the wars and sufferings that countries, minorities, and diverse cultures have had to endure in just this past year alone, I have to believe that there is something greater behind it. According to Aquinas’ Cosmological argument, regarding his first way/mover stating that “objects are in motion and it something is in motion, then it must be caused to be in motion by something outside of itself; there cannot be an infinite chain of moves/movers; so, there has to be a first, unmoved mover, therefore, this first unmoved mover is God.” The meaning derived from St. Thomas Aquinas’ first way is basically stating that nothing can happen without some type of outside force or influence, similar to the cause and effect notion. …show more content…
I believe that everything that we do in our lives has a chain reaction to someone else’s life whether we know them or they are complete strangers. Everything that we as humans do in our life, whether it is driving on a busy road, swerving to avoid hitting a squirrel that ran into the road, you save the squirrel but resulted in you crashing into another car and creating an

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nathan Cha Professor Song Philosophical Perspectives 17 December 2015 The cosmological Argument In William Lane Craig’s, “The Kalam Cosmological Argument,” he argues that whatever begins to exists had a cause of its existence, and since the universe began to exist Craig claims that the universe had a cause for existing. Craig furthers his claim by stating that God is the cause for the universe existing. To object to this argument J.L. Mackie brings some questions to the table to unpack Craig’s claims.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1968 a philosopher named H.J. McCloskey wrote an article titled “On Being an Atheist,” which attacked the main arguments held by theists. The main arguments that he refers to as “proofs” are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the ontological argument. McCloskey’s article debunks these arguments as being false and without proof. He states that theists should dismiss the idea of God entirely. He claims in his opening statements that he will show reasons why theists should be miserable just because they are theists (1).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Aquinas is a Catholic saint that that is an immensely influential philosopher and theologian one of his argument is that God created an ordered natural world and God also created man's ability to use reason. For me yes it’s still logcal to believe in this account of Aquinas, as a person that came on a Catholic school in my high school days but on the society today many of the people didn’t use this God’s gift they will just think themselves on being in a higher ground because if you are higher than others you have the power, money and authority on what you want to do. They didn’t use it to have logical reason on the natural word basis that we should have a balance standing in our society.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conclusion: Therefore, our universe has a cause. This…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the position of the existence of God, several arguments are debated. The cosmological argument, according to the text, holds the position that the universe exists and that something outside of the universe is required to explain its existence; that something being God (Pojman, 57). William Paley presented an inductive, teleological argument in which he believes that we complex beings didn’t occur naturally, thus, the universe must have an intelligent designer (class notes). An opposing position, argued by Hume (Cleanthes), presented several arguments to discredit Paley’s position on the existence of God. Though both men held unique points of views from their arguments, I believe that Hume did a better job at discrediting Paley’s teleological argument and showing exactly where it failed.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The teleological argument, argues that there is some form of intelligence in which the universe has come to exist. The argument goes hand in hand with designs and the principle applies to the whole argument. The designs implies having a designer, and the world shows the marks of design, then the universe was designed by a designer. McCloskey elaborates that the argument of design does not provide enough facts and is insufficient in proving that there is an existence of a God. The teleological and design argument bot refer to an organized entity with a greater purpose, which theist deem as an intelligent designer.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The universe didn’t just happen by chance and there is a purpose or goal. It is a causal argument and focus on modern ideas. There are several types of teleological arguments presented for Gods existence that include analogical, anthropic, and intelligent design. Just as there are arguments for the existence of God, there are also those against God. In this paper I will present a few.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas’ argues that in the world, one can notice things are in motion. He argues that these events are characterized by different things being moved from a state of potentiality to a state of actuality (Stewart et al., 2010). For example, seeds have the potential to be flowers, but until they are acted upon and planted, they remain in a potential state instead of an actual state of a flower. Aquinas continued to argue that these movements from potentiality to actuality that we continually observe in nature cannot simply go on forever. At some point, there has to be a first mover which started this series of movements, at which people arrive at to be God (Stewart et al.,…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas is building of his understanding that God is self-subsistent existence and supplying being to all of His created things. Aquinas begins his argument by explaining that God is in everything, but not as a segment of their essence or even as an accident. He refers back to when he explains the existence of God and says God as an “efficient cause” of the being of the thing . To understand this, we should remember the five ways from ST I.2.3 that prove God’s existence, but specifically the second…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first argument McCloskey objects is the Cosmological Argument. The Cosmological Argument is considered the argument of existence. McCloskey argues that the existence of the entire world does not make it a legit reason to believe in a higher being. He suggests the only reason people take this stance behind the Cosmological Argument is because they are reliant organisms within the world.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In review of the three arguments related to the Proof for the Existence of a god, I found all three arguments to be very convincing, opinionating and interesting. These arguments appeared to be based on personal opinions, while convincing the reader to their beliefs from either a religious view, logical view or natural purpose view. The concept they all appeared to have in common was that they all believed god did exist, which I found to be very enlightening. My impression of each argument would be in the following comments.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an effort to argue for the existence of God, Saint Thomas Aquinas provides five cosmological arguments in his piece “The Existence of God”. The second argument he states examines causes and effects and looks to explain these series in regard to their beginning, or first cause (43:1-2). Aquinas says that the chain of causes and effects cannot go back to “infinity” (43:60) because when the first cause is taken out, so is its effect and every following effect (43:61). I find this claim plausible because this would mean that there would be no “caused” things in existence. Aquinas follows to say that “there obviously are such causes” (43:62) in existence, so the first cause must not have been taken away.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sense brute being do not have a cause, they can’t exist through the principle of sufficient reason. The cosmological argument is defended through this…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Macbeth: Deep Thoughts Yes, I believe that one selfish impulse could lead to a chain of decisions that can reflect on you with lots of pain and anguish. All the time I see people making poor, selfish decisions. I see it in movies, in real life, on T.V shows, and I also read about it in books. In the movies you see that people make decisions based on what they want, not what others want, then they end up getting bit in the rear end for it.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    St. Thomas Aquinas’s sees his conclusion as being correct with a reflection back to his premises because God is the reason that the world is intelligent. How else can these things be possible and have purpose behind them if they aren’t being guided by someone who has structure. In quote, he states “There therefore is some intelligence which directs everything in nature towards an end, and this we call God” (PBF 44). Aquinas is basically saying overall that nothing just ends by chance, but by someone that is necessarily able to end it, which is his God. As Aquinas states within his fourth reason, he says “therefore there is something which is the cause of being, of goodness, and of whatever other perfection that there may be in things (PBF 44).…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays