Sri Aurobindo Summary

Improved Essays
Sri Aurobindo is one of the gifted philosophers of the Indian sub-continent. He had a thorough western upbringing and education. He understood evolution as Darwin. He points out the story of evolution would ultimately leave your life empty. Sri Aurobindo believes science offers rationality. He argues there is more to life than simple biological longevity and spending time to control life.
Sri Aurobindo felt that the human being is a being of aspiration.
Sri Aurobindo feels just as the material is a veil of life the biological life is a veil of mind and that mind is now a further veil, which will transcend itself and show a more radiant truth in the form of some kind of higher consciousness.
Sri Aurobindo believes science addresses heart of
…show more content…
As you read Sri Aurobindo, if you allow your mind to be open to his consciousness without limiting ourselves to simple rational processes, we feel he takes our mind from the bare limitations of rationality and he shows us a sight of the things higher. Sri Aurobindo’s writings is viewed as a powerful way of transforming the mind and raising our consciousness to greater and greater limits. For our rational mind, we see something very important which is a continuity from below up to where we are and that is mainly a result of experience. So in objects we see no consciousness, no connection, no consciousness that we can be aware of. With a flower we can sense the consciousness through response and sensations but not so much in an emotional response that we feel. With animals we feel a direct emotional contact. For example, a young child can be able to sense logically but cannot really articulate in rational terms to converse with us. As he grows older the mind is more formed he is able to argue or converse with …show more content…
The whole logical thinking of the mind is aiming for something which out highest aspirations point out too, but our logical mind is unable to match up to that and falls short. Some of the most obvious forms in which our higher aspirations are recognized but are unreachable are our aspirations for truths, justice, love. When you try to put simple things in harmony such as two people discussing, we find out how difficult it is. It is easy to do it with objects because we limit them to their physical attributes but with people it is much more difficult. For instance, a word spoken, a slight change in tone makes the other person to misunderstand or miss the whole idea. The other person is unable to feel what you are feeling. They are unable to figure out what is your deepest thoughts. They have to listen to your words and stare at your expression in order to guess the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 3 demonstrates Searle’s critical abilities towards Dualism and Materialism, as well as the responses to these arguments by materialists. The opinions include: the prospect of zombification and famous analogies “What Is It like to Be a Bat’, “What Mary Didn’t know” and “the Chinese room” by Nagel, Jackson and Searle himself. In Chapters 4 and 5, Searle’s twofold description of consciousness include its configuration and causal link to our physical bodies as well as the outside world. These influence readers to conclude that if a spectrum of ideas ranging from an immortal spirit to artificial intelligence cannot offer an explanation to the mind body problem where do we go from there? Luckily, Searle provides a solution with “biological…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will be explaining and evaluating Argument 2, on page 36 of Jaegwon Kim's Philosophy of Mind, which supports Cartesian substance dualism. This argument, which I call the argument of transparency, attempts to support the first major tenant of Cartesian substance dualism: There are substances of two fundamentally different kinds in the world, mental substances and material substances—or minds and bodies. The essential nature of a mind is to think, be conscious, and engage in other mental activities; the essence of a body is to have spatial extensions (a bulk) and be located in space. (Kim 34)…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edgar Allan Poe, Vincent Van Gogh, Galileo Galilei, and other breaking-the-social-norms thinkers were not recognized during their time on earth. A French man by the name of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was ridiculed for the majority of his adult life for his stance that evolution and religion can coexist with one another. Going over Teilhard’s basic beliefs, his view on Genesis, and how the world reacted with his ideas can provide a deeper understanding on his life and on the overall subject. The thought of God playing a key role in evolution was an extremely radical idea in the early twentieth century.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mind Games What separates human beings from most of the living world is the ability to be free thinking individuals, to which one can communicate and connect their thoughts to the everyday world. Even though humans may take this gift for granted, it is only when the ability begins to diminish that one seems to understand how crucial it is really is to everyday life. Although, even while losing this gift, the individual may not even know it, for the reality one creates is only visible to that one person, and in turn, that person usually does not realize that this perspective is not what others perceive. It is this phenomenon precisely which grants the full understanding of what the mind, and its established boundaries of understanding, is…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am convinced that the topic at hand is of great significance. In fact, as I prepared to draft this article it became clearer to me that this issue is far more paramount than I ever realized. With that stated, it occurred to me that when the question of how life began on our planet is raised, the theory of evolution dominants academia. That is to say, the modern translation of Darwin’s theory of evolution is regarded above all other possible suppositions when pertaining to our academic models. Consequently, evolution, although unproven, is mandated to be instructed as fact throughout public schools and universities across America.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mind body problem remains a problem in philosophy of mind and philosophy of science. What is the association amongst the physical domain and the mind or consciousness? Is the mind and body one substance as monism disputes? Alternatively, are the mind and body separate as dualism claims? These contrasting doctrines (monism and dualism) have come to an impasse many times.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    CHAPTER #6: ANSWERS RELATED TO OUR QUEST FOR HAPPY LIFE! 82. What is Pilate’s or the modern man 's behavior? • Deep emergence in all materialistic culture aspects of living and ‘preoccupation’ with conformism additionally incapacitates low level ‘susceptibility’ for the relevant influences in Spiritual Infants commonly known as ‘Humans’. Consequently, Terrestrial Humans, in general, cultivate no interest for ‘phenomena’ which convey profound meaning.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We use our attachment to religion, creations stories, and emotions to set ourselves about the rest of the animal kingdom. We are bound by natural law and, to a certain extent, animalistic instinct. In several ways, we can do things better than the average beaver, but in many other ways we are more…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance Dualism Analysis

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages

    All creatures have a material appearance, namely body, but is does not fellows that it all have a mind. The body allows us to perceived knowledge through five senses, which includes touching, seeing, hearing, tasting and smelling. The mind allows us to perceive knowledge through reasoning, including thinking, judging, understanding. Today, Modern science has been able to use the language of biomechanics to explain the structure and the interaction of the body. However, our mind is not yet able to be explained in a physical term.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In their writings, Descartes and Berkeley argue the nature of sensible objects. Sensible objects are what are perceivable to the mind. The nature of how these objects are perceived and if, what the mind perceives exists is the foundation of both Descartes and Berkeley’s arguments. Are sensible objects distinctly external matter that are perceived by the mind, or are they created within the distinct mind and perceived directly. The arguments are related to Descartes and Berkeley’s different stances on rationalism and empiricism, or if our minds identify knowledge of sensible objects through experience or innate knowledge.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Darwin’s theory of evolution is an example of discovery that is generally believed to be one of the most controversial of all, but it is forgotten that some of the earliest supporters of his theory were Christian clergymen Charles Kingsley and Frederick Temple (Brooke, That Modern Science has Secularized Western Culture 227). They suggested that a “God who could make things make themselves was more admirable than one who simply made things” (Brooke, That Modern Science has Secularized Western Culture 227). Another popularizer of Darwin’s theories, Thomas Huxley, saw science as neutral and “extra-Christian”, meaning it had a “scope and autonomy independent of religious interests” (Brooke, That Modern Science has Secularized Western Culture 226).…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the following essay, one wishes to discuss why there can never be any justification for a belief in Other Minds. Descartes offers up “I think therefore I am” in First Meditations on Philosophy (Descartes, 1641), which has it’s fair share of problems but one wishes to use this quote to illustrate that while Descartes only proved that ‘I’ exist within one 's own mind, there is nothing to say that this must extend to others too. Or even to anyone but Descartes and Myself. And while that may seem an irrational claim, one shall go on to justify why this claim may hold as much rationality as its negation.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That is what I find hard with Nonverbal communication it doesn’t matter what the person says or doesn’t say it is what you receive from that conversation is what ultimately matters. In this painful conversation that I had with my dad still brings an emotional attachment to that day and how it made me feel about him and about myself. It was one conversation that I have never forgotten. It changed the course of my life. I would not consider it a successful conversation, but one that I reflect on a lot and I think that I have used it as a template in my life, not as an example of not to follow.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    ‘‘I am not apt to follow blindly the lead of other men’’, said Charles Darwin, the man who is considered a revolutionary scientist of the Victorian era. He faced many obstacles regarding his Theory of Evolution which offended the traditional belief of people in the Victorian era because it went against the religious belief that Human were the superior being however his discovery that humans have common ancestors as other animals decoded a new world of science and helped to build our believe in science. Charles Darwin was a revolutionary scientist who is recognised for his contribution to modern evolutionary studies which helped to shape the Victorian ideal in a different way and still inspires our society in terms of thinking and approaching to problems.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays