God being love was not a new idea to Christians, but saying evolution was God, therefor love, was entirely new. Even decades later, people still find difficulty balancing science and religion and whether there can be overlap between the two. Some would say that Teilhard was a theist, but also argue that he had animist tendencies because he believed God was in evolution. Teilhard however, did not and “presented a dynamic God who is within the universe—a God who is its source, its sustaining power and its ultimate goal” (Hill 151). The whole universe is evolution and since God is the universe that ultimately includes him in the theory. Some readers when learning about Teilhard may relate deeply to his messages. More often than not, combining evolution and religion into one giant, metaphorical melting pot where the two begin to intertwine opens new doors to understanding life and the
God being love was not a new idea to Christians, but saying evolution was God, therefor love, was entirely new. Even decades later, people still find difficulty balancing science and religion and whether there can be overlap between the two. Some would say that Teilhard was a theist, but also argue that he had animist tendencies because he believed God was in evolution. Teilhard however, did not and “presented a dynamic God who is within the universe—a God who is its source, its sustaining power and its ultimate goal” (Hill 151). The whole universe is evolution and since God is the universe that ultimately includes him in the theory. Some readers when learning about Teilhard may relate deeply to his messages. More often than not, combining evolution and religion into one giant, metaphorical melting pot where the two begin to intertwine opens new doors to understanding life and the