Essay On Relativism

Improved Essays
There are obvious truths in life like; the sky is blue, you shouldn’t eat rotten eggs, and if you stop breathing you die. A relativist would find a way to argue that these undeniable truths are not necessarily true, rather they are simply opinions. This is the main difference between a philosopher and a relativist. A philosopher is after the absolute truth, and they don’t let anything get in the way of finding it; while a relativist is concerned with not offending anyone, and letting them hold their own opinions as the truth. Philosophy’s goal is to find out, and raise questions as to what the undeniable truth is and relativism can be a dangerous obstacle in this goal of searching for the absolute truth.

Philosophers have a natural curiosity to question all aspects of life, and want to find what the underlying truth is. It is difficult to scrutinize every single belief you hold in order to find out whether your belief is just that, or if it is
…show more content…
For instance, aesthetic relativism is one of the three main topics I can sympathize with because I don’t believe that there is one true definition of what beauty is. The ideas of beauty differs from person to person, whether it is human beauty, art, or anything in general. By asking this question, it makes me analyze what other branches of relativism I’m sympathetic towards, and how this will effect my overarching conclusion of the existence of one answer. Aesthetics are something I believe are purely opinion based because when you’re talking about art I would say that I think that Willem de Kooning’s Woman V or Jaspers Johns False Start is really beautiful and moving, then there will be, and is, clear opposition to what I think is beautiful in art. The same idea could happen when you're talking about beauty in other people, it’s not that there is a pure definitive truth of what beauty is, but it’s more about people’s experiences and their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He basically points out that the relativist sees that since there are differences between cultures, we cannot judge which is better. Rachels also presents three implications of cultural relativism. These are problems he finds within the argument for why cultural relativism makes sense. His first implication is that if cultural relativism is true, we cannot claim that our moral code is morally superior to others. This is because if we were to compare our moral code with another in order to see that ours is superior, we would be viewing the two cultures as the same, that there are no differences within the situations the two are…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe that it is common sense to disagree with moral relativism solely on the fact that it accepts racism, genocide of groups, even murder, as justifiable as long as that is what the group values to be right or acceptable. Having the beliefs of a moral relativist, you could go so far as to say that a group or culture could decide that starting a nuclear war was morally just, and that we as people outside of that group could not criticize those people for their actions. If ethical relativism is to be completely true, there can be no common ground for resolving moral disputes or for reaching an agreement on moral matters between members of different cultures. When it comes to justifying moral relativism, there is no decision procedure that can demonstrate the objective truth or falsity of moral judgments. On the contrary, moral objectivism, also known as moral absolutism, encompasses ethical theories that support the objectivity of moral values and norms.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism has been looked at from several different angles by many different people. Louis P. Pojman is one person that has not only questioned, but rejected the concept. Pojman’s argument stands on four objections. His protests are that ethical relativism leads to ridiculous outcomes, gives way to subjectivism, is logically inconsistent, and provides no rational method to resolve conflicts within and between cultures. Pojman theorized that, if the world were to go by ethical relativism, one could no longer make judgements against any society, including their own, because no external or objective truth exists.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral relativism- The idea of moral relativism is one that morality is relevant to your situation, and that you should be accepting other people's morals and cultures. Moral relativism can first be seen in the colonies, mainly by the quakers in pennsylvania, and quakers were also vehemently against slavery, which was another morally relativistic idea. Moral absolutism- The idea that there is a clear right and wrong and that right and wrong is the same for every situation, and the idea has had many impacts on historical events in us history.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world of Pojman On behalf of Pojman and his interpretation of universal moral principles “The individual realizes his personality through his culture, hence respect for individual differences entails a respect for cultural differences” The executive board of the American Anthropological Association (69) The executive board of the American Anthropological Association proposal was meant to acknowledge moral diversity in different cultures around the world. This fragment was part of an introductory reading to the essay, “ The Case Against Ethical Relativism” by Louis Pojman. In this essay, he elaborates different arguments against ethical relativism, explains his own interpretation of universal moral principles and reconciles cultural…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Debora Netcliff Professor Stanley English 100 19 October 2017 A Defense Of Moral Relativism Ethical relativism or Moral relativism is the proposition that what is considered moral or immoral or what is wrong or right depends on culture norms, and what behaviors is accepted in different societies in which a decision is made. Also what can be deemed as immoral or moral, bad may be good and ethical in another's society Many cultures differ in their moral practices. These moral and ethical decisions are also based off of inner judgments.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the textbook “Think Sociology” cultural relativism can be defined as,People who do not belong to a culture should not judge that culture or personal believes, without trying to understand why that person believes in that specific culture or…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism is an individual 's own beliefs determined by background or culture, meaning a belief or right or wrong based on how they were raised in their family or culture. Emotivism is an individual 's perspective on right or wrong based on their response to the action. If the individual feels it is right , they will feel good. If the individual feels it is wrong, they will feel bad. This perspective does not deal in facts, but rather feelings on a given situation.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    mention, “ relativism is initiated by recognition of the need to support opinions… Relativistic thinkers acknowledge that some opinions are of little value, yet reasonable people can also legitimately disagree on some matters.” (2010). My transition to relativism was due in part because it became vital to my college education to understand that not all classmates and coworkers opinions were credible and valuable to my educational experiences in that their individual knowledge was contextualized to their own perspectives and experiences. Others opinions would be held as valuable for my development based on my perception of their knowledge and the value I assigned to their opinions (D. Taub, personal communication, October 5, 2015).…

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I chose that I am a relativist because I believe that everyone’s moral principle is relative to the person who holds it. Everyone has their own opinion on what is permissible and what is not permissible. Everyone’s moral code can be different than society, for prime example, some people believe that everyone should be treated equally, and some do not. We as individuals cannot say that everyone’s moral value or cultural practice is objectively right or wrong. I am exactly like this, everyone has their own opinion, practices and beliefs, we cannot use our standards to judge another’s morality it is just ethically wrong.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism is the belief that each culture defines their own morality and because of this we should not judge a cultures morality because one is not better than the other. Acceptance is a strength of relativism, because it could promote the idea that we are all different and we should all accept each other for who we are. Another of its strengths is allowing people to choose a moral code to live by and not be subjected to one way of thinking. However there are some downsides to relativism, for example promoting intolerance. Intolerance promoted due to the fact that if a culture is committing genocide relativists say that we are not allowed to judge them because that might just be a part of their culture.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy paper on relativism and weather I agree or disagree In the following paper I will be discussing relativism, more specifically cultural and ethical relativism and weather I agree or disagree with that philosophy. Cultural revisits state that “no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong.” Ethical relativism states that …”whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced”. I agree with ethical and cultural relativism because there is no right or wrong moral code because people and societies have different beliefs.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's View Of Relativism

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Traditional Understanding Although a key issue in contemporary times, relativism dates back to the beginnings of Western philosophy. As Baghramian (2015) notes, the earliest documented source on relativism can be traced back to Plato’s account of the Sophist Philosopher Protagoras of Abdera (490-420BC) who, during a period of increased contact between people of different cultures in ancient Athens, claimed that “Man is the measure of all things; of the things that are, that they are; and of the things that are not, that they are not” (p. 233). While it is unclear whether Protagoras’s comment was necessarily relativist in the way that relativism is used to attack his ideas today (Marc & Curd, 2000), Plato interpreted Protagoras as meaning…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moral relativists such as David Wong and Gilbert Harman have provided a more sophisticated version of moral relativism which mitigated some flaws of the inaugural and naïve form which Rachel argued against. Cultural relativism is also a relevant theory to explain the extreme cases of disagreements in our world. However, there is still invalidity and shortcomings of the cultural relativism argument that hinders moral progress, or deteriorate the view about morality into nihilistic grounds. Hence it is still essential to maintain some moral truths as objective instead of accepting the theory in…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays