Economic Freedom: The Pros And Cons Of Socialism

Great Essays
Economic Freedom Imagine a world where capitalism was the only ideology. What would it look like? Well, in general, there would be little to no governmental intervening or help given to the people and all businesses would be run and maintained by the citizens instead of the government. However, there are some problems with this totally capitalistic world, especially with corruption involved. To avoid these problems, a socialist view can be inputted instead of capitalist. Socialism is the opposite of capitalism, where instead of no government interference, the government runs everything. This ideology allows many good aspects to be shown in this world; one example is that citizen’s health care and schooling would be totally free, as it is …show more content…
For example, in socialism, everyone is able to receive health care and education for free which benefits people who cannot afford health care or education. This allows the more unfortunate people to receive an equal chance in schooling as wealthier people. Socialism brings people together into one equal class where everyone is equivalent to each other, no matter what (10 Biggest Pros and Cons of Socialism, n.d.). One way of doing this is by the government taxing the rich more percent than the poor are taxed. These extra tax percentages go towards welfare and giving less wealthy people an advantage. Another aspect of socialism is that since the government runs all the business, monopolies and monopsonies are abolished and the prices of products are regulated by the government alone so that an equal chance is given to everyone. However, as history proves, socialism is only possible without any corruption in the government and since full power goes to the government, this can be an …show more content…
A way to get the pros of both ideologies and less cons of both is to have them coincide. By combining capitalism and socialism, the pros combine to become even better and the cons cancel each other out. For example, businesses can be owned by people and the government and they can compete together. This reduces monopoly power and also decreases the amount of control the government has in certain areas. Another example is the opportunity for free health care and education for all classes, rich and poor. One last example is the strive for growing a business and the ability to eventually have a greater income, while the government is still able to provide welfare to the less fortunate without ridiculously taxing the richer classes. It shows that if a country can find a perfect combination of capitalism and socialism so that the government and citizens can coincide and work together, then greater opportunities are possible for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    My revision is to elaborate on the economic system portion of my review and to add additional information. In this week's assignment, I selected to address the Ledbetter vs. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company case, where Lilly Ledbetter filed discrimination for gender pay. Capitalism and socialism both serve as a crucial part of the economic system for this setting. Some of the characteristics of capitalism are better working conditions, better wages, the profit motive, competition, and greed. In reference to the socialist theory which is practically the opposite and is not motivated by personal self-interest.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Case For Socialism

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The article to be analysed in this report is an article by Alan Maass titles ‘The Case for Socialism’ that appeared on SOCIALISTWORKER.org’s website on April 16, 2010. The author of the article Alan Mass is the editor for the previously mentioned website and also an author of a book going by a similar title. There are two mutually exclusive, opposite formal economic systems in the world that any society/country must choose. These are Socialist and Capitalist systems. The capitalist system is a market based systems with buyers and sellers.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Summary: Through history socialism has shown people that it is not effective in different countries around the world. A great example of this is my country Venezuela, there the government is trying to apply this type of economic system for the past 17 years, and it haven’t done anything better for the country. The country is a total disaster on the economic area and people is starving just for the fact that the government did not know how to manage their basic needs productions. This article explain how a socialism economic model is not that efficient is your government does not have the right people to administer it.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Chapter Seven: Capitalism Gives What does capitalism give that socialism cannot? A better way to answer this is to look at the nature of the universe itself, not just socially and economically. All things in the universe run in cycles, even the universe itself. The universe expands and contracts.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The aspect of Socialism has been implemented in the societal countries of Venezuela, where it failed miserably in an attempt to stabilize the country and ended up placing the people in terror a supreme state of fear, and also in Brazil, where it caused a demographic of oppression in terms of poor treatment. Whereas the concept of Communism has been…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More specifically, how much the government receives. In communism, their essentially no private ownership of any kind, as the people work for each other and the good if the community as a whole, rather then work to benefit themselves as individuals. It also wishes to throw away the class system as a whole and not define the poor from the rich, and just keep them at equal levels. Not quite as severe, socialism is less lenient on closing the gap between the rich and the poor, but rather keep the two on fair playing fields and sharing the wealth of the people with everyone. As opposed to taking away private ownership from individuals, socialism believes more in assisting the lower-classes to keep them equal to the higher-class (I.e. social security).…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The socialist-based economy incorporates elements of centralized economic planning, utilized to ensure conformity and to encourage equality of opportunity and…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After reading about communism, one can truly grasp the differences between a capitalist society, like our own and a Communist one. Communism is defined as "a classless society in which all wealth and property would be owned by the community as a whole" (Ellis 210). Researching the founders, history and main characteristics of communism could certainly open the eyes of a close-minded believer of capitalism. Communism was founded by Karl Marx and Fredrich Engels during the second half of the 19th century.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Governments that follow a socialist path are very good in theory, but very bad in practice, as shown by the Soviet Union. (It was Communism a form of socialist government) The idea of a socialist government is that society is completely classless. There is no rich and there is no poor everyone is equal and poverty is zero. This is achieved by the government determining what is produced and how much of it has to be produced so that there is enough to satisfy everyone.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socialist’s support a system in which there is no private property and encourages a revolution of the working class people against the bourgeoisies. However even though the idea of a revolution resonates as extreme, the foremost socialist principles intended to introduce better equality in social and working conditions (Kilroy-Silk, 1973). A notion of the businessman and property-owning citizens exploiting working class people is what brought upon an uprising during the French revolution in 1789. Socialism was then brought about again by the European industrial revolution that swept nations in 1848. The brutal conditions that resulted in the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socialism is the idea of a social organization that supports production, distribution, and trade should be controlled within the community itself. The social part of it means that everyone pays for all of the production. In socialized healthcare, everyone pays into the system and those who need care get it without extra charge. The same goes for roads, energy, or any other infrastructure project - we all pay the same and have access to the same benefits. The problem such a system runs into, however, is that there is often not enough money to go around, and because things are free, people get greedy and abuse the system.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is also important for other competitors in this process. In a socialist system, people don’t need to compete for their development because everything belongs to the community; instead of this they compete for political power, which causes much instability in socialist countries. This harms the development of the countries, and it also helps explain why many capitalist countries are secure, such as the United States and Canada. On the other hand, socialism may be viewed as superior to capitalism because it seeks for social justice and promotes education. Socialism, a general term for the political and economic theory, advocates a system of collective or government ownership and management of the means of production and distribution of goods.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In todays society, people are given various freedoms with which they can live their lives under their own personal terms. However, in the world of economics, these freedoms are not necessarily the same. Economic freedom is defined as, “the freedom to prosper within a country without intervention from a government or economic authority” (Business Dictionary). This is rarely the case in the real world. Companies and organizations are always held accountable for their actions.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    For example, in the U.S., we have Medicare, social security benefits, and social nutrition assistance programs that are considered socialist in nature. ADVANTAGES: • Great efficiency • Greater social…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays