Disadvantages Of Wikipedia Essay

Improved Essays
When a development of technology has extended and been more progressive since many years ago, it absolutely makes many people’s lives easier and convenient. Nowadays, this technology also has directly an impact on people’s lifestyles in the way allows people to have more effective abilities and have more spaces on an online social communication, also known as a social network, which is “an online community of people with a common interest who use a website or other technologies to communicate with each other and share information, resources, [and others]” (Dictionary). Facebook, which is the biggest social network of the world and found by Mark Zuckerberg, and Wikipedia, which is a useful free online encyclopedia, are the social networking …show more content…
Additionally, Wikipedia also does the same things as Facebook that simplifies people to have social networking participation but in an informative way. As The New York Review of Books, Nicholson Baker indicates about Wikipedia in his article “The Charms of Wikipedia” that:
[W]hen people [helps] they [are] given a flattering name. They [aren’t] called "Wikipedia 's little helpers," they [are] called “editors” […] [which] [s]ome [bring] very fancy professional metal rakes. […] [And] [t]he people who [guard] the leaf pile [are] called “deletionists." (Baker 1)
This Baker’s statement shows that Wikipedia allows people or users to participate with the others in term of informatively responding to the questions. It also let people and web users create a new page with reliant historical information, and it calls these people as “editors”; in contrast, sometimes some people are called “deletionists” if they deliberately delete that information. Thus, both Facebook and Wikipedia likely help people able participating on the social network, and these social networking websites also become informative

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Criticism of Wikipedia—of its content, procedures, and operations, and of the Wikipedia community—covers many subjects, topics, and themes about the nature of Wikipedia as an open source encyclopedia of subject entries that almost anyone can edit. Wikipedia has been criticized for the uneven handling, acceptance, and retention of articles about controversial subjects. The principal concerns of its critics are the factual reliability of the content; the readability of the prose; and a clear article layout; the existence of systemic bias; of gender bias; and of racial bias among the editorial community that is Wikipedia. Further concerns are that the organization allows the participation of anonymous editors (leading to editorial vandalism);…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the course of the last few weeks we have learned about several methods of research. One of these methods was working with Wikipedia. While working with Wikipedia I realized that this crowd-sourced tool is actually well maintained, accurate, and could actually be considered a conventional method of research. However, Timothy Messer-Kruse, a professor in the School of Cultural and Critical Studies at Bowling Green State University and author of The ‘Undue Weight’ of Truth on Wikipedia newspaper article, would say otherwise. Based on his article it is evident that Messer-Kruse would disagree with our method of research and would recommend that we deviate from such research.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What is Wikipedia? Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia used for finding what some people call “facts”, information, details and content about a certain person, place or thing. Some people would rate Wikipedia pretty high simply because its always the first site that pops up when looking for answers to a logical question or even going as far as to determining the context of a statement. Others would rate Wikipedia extremely low simply because anyone is eligible to place their own thoughts and information upon the site, whether it is factual or opinionated. Either way, Wikipedia is being improved constantly, making tremendous changes per hour every day.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After watch the two short video my considerations are, Wikipedia, an online information center, has in a general sense changed the substance of reference books and shrewd journals over the span of the latest ten years. It is quickly taking books, journals, and money out of the condition for examination. Wikipedia has made another way to deal with amass information, casual association, and do ask about. Notwithstanding the way that Wikipedia has its positive uses it is not for the most part a strong source and is best used as a starting stage for investigation.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Stand Against Wikipedia by Scott Jaschik draw attention on how students should not use Wikipedia as a resources due to its inaccuracy details and lack completeness entries. In his article he emphasize, “ As Wikipedia has become more and more popular with students, some professors have become increasingly concerned about the online, reader- produced encyclopedia.” Scott have a point where there is plenty of inaccuracy details, but that’s not accurate at all. If the person gathered enough sources that seemingly relates one to the other, then there the sources surely is accurate. Basically, don’t rely on one resources, the researchers needs plenty of resources in order for him or her to make a case or support his or her idea.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people would look down upon Wikipedia since anybody who has a Wikimedia account can quickly write or edit articles on the site. However, over time, corporates, famous entertainers, authors, politicians and companies have discovered that Wikipedia makes them notable and credible. You only need to mention your name or the name of your company to a lay man and they will quickly search that name online. If there is an article about it on Wikipedia, they will trust you. And what's more, Wikipedia has one of the highest Google search engine page ranking thereby making your work easily noticed.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Wikipedia is basically a web based, crowdsourced encyclopedia. They have millions of articles with a very wide variety of topics. The website's information is a collaboration of people ideas and research. The site allows anyone to edit the information on the articles. Because anyone can edit the article this often can lead to wrong information and sometimes even vandalism on the site.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Wikipedia is based on the founding principles that led to the development of these rules. Some tips to start contributing on Wikipedia are available here, the main has always been Do not hesitate! On Wikipedia, there is no training required and no assigned tasks. This means that any person can find a part of the encyclopedia that interests and improve immediately (if she would have something better to offer).…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wikipedia: Content and Accuracy What is Wikipedia? Wikipedia is a public website for people to write or search useful information. New information is updated on this site every hour. Anyone can contribute and edit information on this website.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lucy P. Marcus Connection

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this article, the author wants us to know how it is easy to get involved with Facebook nowadays. The evidence says that people spend hours and hours on it, doing nothing special. The writer once forgets to attend an important event because he was feeling Facebook is more important, like a job. He wants us to know how people have forgotten about the day today's life in order to spend more time on social media. In this article, his audience must be the people, who spend more time with social media instead of family and work.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia, is becoming more popular every day (Polk, Johnston, Evers, 2015, p.92). It can give a wealth of information easily to anyone who wishes to learn about a topic. However, concerns have risen about its use in research for schools. In the article “Wikipedia Use in Research: Perceptions in Secondary Schools” by Tracy Polk of Worcester Preparatory School, Melissa Johnston of the University of Alabama, and Stephanie Evers of the University of South Alabama, researches the way teachers, librarians, and library staff perceive Wikipedia and its use in public education. Polk, Johnston, and Evers define “research” as “any information that students seek to complete their papers, homework, and other assignments,…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wikipedia In Classroom

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wikipedia “contains more than 5,300,000” articles that are easy to use and up- to date on information. (“School Says No to Wikipedia” Achieve3000).“A reader should rely on the Wikipedia article as much,but no more, than the sources the article relies on” (O’Neal “Using Wikipedia in the Classroom: A Good Start”). This means that Wikipedia has a good amount of information to trust and use to get started on a topic but, people should make sure that they check the information. Wikipedia should be used in the classroom because it is an accurate source of information, it helps people get a good idea of a topic, and it has up to date information that people can use.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marshall Poe, history professor and author of The Hive, and Thomas L. Friedman, three time Pulitzer Prize winner and author of The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention, discuss two different but similar topics: Wikipedia and global supply chains. Both of these collaborative paradigms come with consequences that can be either positive or negative. In the world today, collaborative paradigms generate both positive and negative ramifications in the way that people, businesses, and countries all over the world exchange new ideas and technologies. Wikipedia has become one of the most well know collaborative paradigms used by people all over the world. With the invention of wikipedia and the internet, research suddenly became much easier.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sometimes in a positive way and many other times in a negative way. Facebook, twitter, snapchat, instagram and more, are all social media profiles we create to talk to anyone we’d like without knowing who they are. But these sights are also helpful when it comes to finding things out because of how fast the information is spread. Social media is slowly but surely taking over our everyday…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Social Media Trends

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The fact is still that the internet has improved people’s lives much more convenient. Particularly, we can think that social media is the one has improved many things. It can send and spread people’s information such as one’s…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays