Pros And Cons Of Writing On Wikipedia

Improved Essays
Most people would look down upon Wikipedia since anybody who has a Wikimedia account can quickly write or edit articles on the site. However, over time, corporates, famous entertainers, authors, politicians and companies have discovered that Wikipedia makes them notable and credible. You only need to mention your name or the name of your company to a lay man and they will quickly search that name online. If there is an article about it on Wikipedia, they will trust you. And what's more, Wikipedia has one of the highest Google search engine page ranking thereby making your work easily noticed. You can also clean your online personal image by writing a juicy biography that will endear you to readers.

Publishing on Wikipedia though, is not an easy task. Your article needs to be notable and have
…show more content…
Strong adjectives should be avoided since they may be seen as to promote or advertise your content. Industry jargons should also be kept at bay since not everybody might understand what you mean by the term 'litigator' or 'barrister'. If you are writing about a person who has been involved in multiple controversies that were mentioned in the media, do not fear stating them. Say that the person was involved in such and such a controversy but get a clever way of removing them from such infamous controversies.

All content on Wikipedia should be properly cited and referenced to avoid plagiarism. With references, not all are valid. Using personal blogs and press releases written by the company PR department might will not be classified as good references. However, mentions on popular newspapers and educational journals are valid references. Once you are done writing your article, proofread it for content and grammar so that it reads smoothly and clearly. You could also ask someone else to read it for you before publishing to ensure that it makes sense to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nt1330 Unit 3 Assignment 1

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wiki- is an open website for users to add their own information to help others. It is a huge encyclopaedia where users can join and write articles or new ones to help people for what they are searching for. Information is passed on around because users can edit on the article and insert their own information relevant to the article. You can either edit or change information on it. Here is an example…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The internal source of verbal information in ASDA gets from face to face interviews, Meetings, sale, HR, Customer service and from finance. The external sources of verbal information in ASDA are gets from customer, government and from suppliers. Written Information The second one is written information.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The ‘Undue Weight’ of Truth on Wikipedia by Timothy Messer-Kruse is a great article about Kruse’s experience with the information, authors, and policies on Wikipedia. During the reading Kruse made valid points about Wikipedia’s policies and the requirements that need to be met in order to change an article on the website; these points left me with many questions. For example, why do secondary sources have more weight than certain primary sources? One would think that testimony from the publishing by the Library of Congress would have more weight than a book published about the case. Aside from the questions left unanswered, this was a very interesting and amusing article that catches the reader’s attention and promotes more in-depth…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Surprisingly, some of the best articles I have read were very casually written. A fitting description for the article “Lil Wayne I Am Not a Human Being II” by zcamp. It is loose in style and flows easily, reflecting that of a conversation between friends. The author writes confidently about the number of phallic metaphors Wayne uses in his songs, noting that he sets the world record, and makes a joke of his own renaming one of the songs as “Penis Colada”. Of course, even in a conversational tone, the author shows a great deal of effort in researching not only the number of songs contributing to Wayne’s world record, but also taking the reader through a brief history and progression of the artist.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This source was very helpful in my overall research project because it contained all the important information that I needed and it had information on a variety of topics. The types of information found in databases are newspaper articles, journals entries, books, and much more. I will also use it in my future project to find the reliable information on the internet. This source is dependable because it is a fact-based site, unlike Wikipedia. It is a great asset to my…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Wikipedia In Education

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Current technology such as laptops and internet, has allowed the growth of collaborative learning by giving people instant access to information, the best example of which is Wikipedia. There is no doubt that Wikipedia is the largest online encyclopedia now, but it is still uncommon to see the use of Wikipedia in classrooms. The truth is, Wikipedia is one of the best candidates for learning tools, because of its collaborative nature. The reason behind the unpopularity of Wikipedia is that many focus only on the downside of the collaboration on Wikipedia.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The information articles should be current with in-cite notations which made me realize if the information I researched was reliable. I also considered if articles had evidence to determine…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When doing research on a paper you are writing you find yourself asking if a website is credible or not. You may think it is not credible because of how the website is layed out or that the information is so old that it doesn't apply today. If you find yourself asking that question then you need to look at what makes a source credible. The things to determine whether a website is credible or not is authority, accuracy, and currentisity of that specific website.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Waters in Why You Can’t Cite Wikipedia in My Class would say “Wikipedia owes its incredible growth to open-source editing, which is also the root of its greatest weakness” (16). I disagree with this statement and agree with Crovitz and Smoot instead, in Wikipedia: Friend, Not Foe they state, “Because Wikipedia is always evolving, its entries often include unconventional sections that might never have been included in a traditional encyclopedia” (93). To me this means that you could actually find valuable information in Wikipedia as it becomes available that you would not find in Encyclopedias since they are not updated as Wikipedia…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Along with that, it gives you useful tips on how to cite other sources and give the author the credit he or she deserves so that you can avoid plagiarism. In Writing: 10 Core Concepts, Yagelski suggests that “The most important guideline to follow when using any source material is to focus on your own ideas and the point you are making.” (743). When you include…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Wikipedia Should Be Allowed in Schools By Pedro Torres Wikipedia is used by everyone. It is the 7th most used site in the world, with an average of around 800 million views per month (as of March 2016). The site has what is one of, if not THE largest database of information available to mankind. Yet, in most schools across the country, it’s not allowed to be used for research in an essay or project. Why?…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What is Wikipedia? Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia used for finding what some people call “facts”, information, details and content about a certain person, place or thing. Some people would rate Wikipedia pretty high simply because its always the first site that pops up when looking for answers to a logical question or even going as far as to determining the context of a statement. Others would rate Wikipedia extremely low simply because anyone is eligible to place their own thoughts and information upon the site, whether it is factual or opinionated. Either way, Wikipedia is being improved constantly, making tremendous changes per hour every day.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Wikipedia is one of the most commonly used links when it comes to research. In fact, if you were to google Wikipedia it would be one of the first links to click on on the page. Wikipedia however is not always truthful. Anybody can post on Wikipedia; whether they find new information or they want to change information that is on the page. Wikipedia can’t be resourceful though.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They contain only expert reviewed information that is proven to be fact based, which establishes their creditability. A popular source is another type of reference however it is not a favorite of this discipline. Popular sources are written for entertainment, news and other…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Academic researcher, Danah Boyd, argues in her article, “Wikipedia as a Site of Knowledge Production”, of how using Wikipedia as a credible source should be accepted. Many students have been told to steer away from Wikipedia, but Boyd does a superb job of discussing how the information on Wikipedia is easy to understand, it is new and frequently evolving, and it is less bias than books. Some may say that Wikipedia isn’t credible because people can always change the information at any time, but Wikipedia has taken security measure to fix that problem. Boyd has mostly good evidence that proves that Wikipedia is a good source because it is knowledgeable and is able to fix their security problems with the use of examples of logos and…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays