Content And Accuracy Of Wikipedia

Improved Essays
Wikipedia: Content and Accuracy What is Wikipedia? Wikipedia is a public website for people to write or search useful information. New information is updated on this site every hour. Anyone can contribute and edit information on this website. It is encouraged and designed for them to do so. To make sure that every fact added to the site is resourceful, Wikipedia has administrators and a judicial committee. These special groups keep track of poor information. Wikipedia is primarily based off of communal knowledge. They believe community learning is essential to the basis of the website. Ruling out un-useful information is not a main priority. They believe that over time peer-edits will help make the information more resourceful. Wikipedia is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nt1330 Unit 3 Assignment 1

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wiki- is an open website for users to add their own information to help others. It is a huge encyclopaedia where users can join and write articles or new ones to help people for what they are searching for. Information is passed on around because users can edit on the article and insert their own information relevant to the article. You can either edit or change information on it. Here is an example…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We don’t realize it but everything we see is information. Every time we watch the news, read a poster, or read an email, we are seeing information. If we don’t know how to comprehend that information than that is certainly a large issue. Information is the reason why our world is so functional. Think of the medical field for example.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The domain of the source is “.gov” which means the US Government is in control of the website. An assumption can be made that all the information is legitimate, because it is under the supervision of the government. The author of the article is Mae Bowen, however there is no background knowledge of the author. The author has a bias tone towards the topic, which is the Civil Rights Act. The tone the author presents about the topic is positive.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Information literacy is also very important for academics and even for personal use. Because of the increased development of the internet it is crucial to know what is an accurate piece of information and which is not. It also helps with rational thinking and problem solving by asking questions, analyze data, and making a decision. Each and every day we are taking in a large amount of information from the internet, tv, radio, our friends and family, and from other sources that it is important to know whether or not the information is even factual or is something we must remember. With the help of information literacy, people are able to find out which type of information is right and which is wrong.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Wikipedia In Education

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Granted this observation, she asks student in her class to edit each one entry on Wikipedia, and the students admit that it is “harder to get their work to ‘stick’ on Wikipedia than it [is] to write a traditional term paper”(286). Providing the editors with detailed reference guidelines,Wikipedia encourages references for editing, and lines that are not supported by substantial source is marked on the article, which means students often need dig into the subject that he/she is…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Non Credible Sources

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another thing that makes Wikipedia a non-credible source is that anyone can make updates or change any/all of the information on the page as long as you create a Wikipedia account. This is portrayed within the URL provided above with each edit from different authors. The hardest part about sifting through the nutritional information was having to verify whether or not the information given on this site was accurate by going to a credible source to compare the information. Sifting through the information just way too time consuming, incredibly inconvenient and entirely…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, people on the Internet share a lot of information that some of them are…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When doing research on a paper you are writing you find yourself asking if a website is credible or not. You may think it is not credible because of how the website is layed out or that the information is so old that it doesn't apply today. If you find yourself asking that question then you need to look at what makes a source credible. The things to determine whether a website is credible or not is authority, accuracy, and currentisity of that specific website.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Papedia Case Studies

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Papedia et al., performed the largest serious in adolescents (76 patients) treated with BPD. 68 patients were studied retrospectively for long-term outcomes (mean of 11 years). The mean age was 16.8 years. The mean percentage of EWL at each patient’s longest follow-up was 78%. Although immediate postoperative complications were rare, this series of patients had 19 reoperations in 14 patients (including 4 obstructions and 5 incisional hernias), 3 deaths (protein malnutrition, pulmonary edema, and pancreatitis), and 9 patients with documented protein malnutrition.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The internet helps people simply find knowledge from Wikipedia and discuss academic question on the forums. Thus, the academic forums and Wikipedia are supplemental evidences to prove that the Internet can do things which the college do. This idea confirms the function of the internet but ignores that quality of knowledge on the Internet is not valid. As we know neither academic forums nor Wikipedia belong in any colleges or universities or educational institution. Generally, most of the similar websites on the internets are open source and free to be edited.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even when I had been going through middle school and high school, my teachers had always been very clear about not using Wikipedia as a source. They would only go as far as to suggest that it could be used as a start for research, but never as an actual source for a project. She uses examples of student’s interviews, the fact that it is constantly updated, and how it has a better example of the American Revolution than an advanced class. She discusses how students had been told to not use Wikipedia as a “main source”, but they were not told why they were not allowed to use Wikipedia or why other sources were more trustworthy. People use Wikipedia to spread their knowledge and, it is usually much easier for people to understand a difficult topic if it is explained by another…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Wikipedia is based on the founding principles that led to the development of these rules. Some tips to start contributing on Wikipedia are available here, the main has always been Do not hesitate! On Wikipedia, there is no training required and no assigned tasks. This means that any person can find a part of the encyclopedia that interests and improve immediately (if she would have something better to offer).…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To what extent we criticize the information varies from person to person, much like the things we choose to believe. This is our philosophy. Philosophy is an endless process of questioning and interpreting our world. It can change…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I couldn 't imagine how many people out of the millions are sharing the wrong information to the community. Since Facebook has changed about how we view things in a certain perspective, it is unsure to myself and many others of believe what is right, and what is wrong. In conclusion, to prevent and protect the community from misinformation, I highly recommend people to double check the information they receive before passing it on to other people. Although some information provides statistics it does not always mean the information provided is true without further information or credible sources you can’t be so sure.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of a wiki is to facilitate participation in an easy-to-use online environment by a community of people who care about the content because they have ownership of the process and the…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays