Simone V. Simone's Case: The Uniform Prenuptial Agreement Act

Good Essays
The Uniform Prenuptial Agreement Act provides that a premarital agreement is not enforceable if the party against whom enforcement is sought proves that: (1) That party did not execute the agreement voluntarily; or (2) The agreement was unconscionable when it was executed and, before execution of the agreement, that party: (i) Was not provided a fair and reasonable disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party; (ii) Did not voluntarily and expressly waive, in writing, any right to disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party beyond the disclosure provided; and (iii) Did not have, or reasonably could not have had, an adequate knowledge of the property or financial obligations of the other party. …show more content…
Simone , a Pennsylvania case, used more of a contract approach when determineing the enforceability of a premarital agreement. In that case, a neurosurgeon presented a prenuptial agreement to his soon to be wife, who was a nurse, for her to sign on the night before their wedding. Mrs Simone argued that such agreement was invalid because she signed the agreement without fully understanding the content of the agreement, and without the advice of an attorney. The court disagreed and ruled that even though the agreement between the parties did not embody a reasonable or good bargain, the lack of legal counsel along with Mrs. Simone’s ignorance of the terms, were not valid reasons to not enforce the contract. Simone v. Simone, 581 A.2d 162 (Penn. 1990). The court looked at the procedural fairness along with the substantive fairness, and adopted the standards that a spouse should be bound by the terms of a prenuptial agreement, so long as the agreement is in writing, there is a full and fair financial disclosure by both parties prior to execution, no fraud, duress, or misrepresentation exists, and the terms of the agreement must not be unconscionable at the time of execution. Id. Here, the Pennsylvania court look at the unconcionability at the time the agreement was executed. The court did not concern themselves about the fairness at the time of …show more content…
In Benscoter v. Benscoter, 200 Pa.Super. 251, 188 A.2d (1963), a couple married for fifteen years with four boy children. The husband filed for a divorce on the grounds of indignities. The husband complained that the wife expressed her disappointment in failing to have a female child and that she verbally abused him and blamed him for this failure. The wife was stricken with multiple scrosses and claimed that her husband was seeing another woman because of her illness.

In Pennsylvania to succeed in a divorce case on the grounds of cruelty, the plaintiff must show marital misconduct on the part of the other spouse. Here the court believed that the husband was not the innocent and injured spouse and that the wife’s illness, both explained and excused the wife’s conduct and the acts of a spouse resulting from ill health do not furnish a ground for

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Parol Evidence Rule

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    425, 433 (1999). Stated differently, parol evidence cannot be used to add or alter the terms of a completely integrated contract, but it can be used to define ambiguous terms. Likewise, “[i]t is well settled that the parol evidence rule does not prevent the introduction of parol evidence indicating that the written instrument was not to become effective as an instrument, until a prior condition or event had occurred.” Foreman, supra, 257 Md. at 442. “Parol evidence is admissible, therefore, to show that a writing never became effective as a contract or that it was void or voidable.” Tricat Indus., Inc. v. Harper, 131 Md.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There is nothing so dangerous, so fascinating, to a temperament like yours it is a false and foolish fancy. Can you not trust me as a physician when I tell you so?" This piece of evidence explains that what he was saying to his wife was, "Listen I'm the doctor I can tell when you are getting better just listen to me!" Unfortunately, he really didn’t understand what she was going through. This is the story of how a woman who had postpartum depression and how her husband John didn’t understand what the problem was and how it affected her.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ultratra Vires Case Study

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    6. ULTRA VIRES CONTRACTS A contract of company which is ultra vires, i.e., outside the objective clause as defined by memorandum of association is wholly void and is of no legal effect. The objection to an ultra vires contract is, not merely that the company ought not to have made it, but that it could not make it. The main issue is not as to the legality of the contract; but the issue is as to the competency and authority of the company to make it. An ultra vires contract which has the effect of void- ab- initio, cannot become intra vires by any reason of estoppels, lapse of time, ratification, acquiescence or delay.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Force Majeure Clause a. This clause excuses the party from performing any contractual obligations as an unforeseeable event has happened. 2. Discharge by Frustration a. Neither party was responsible for the destruction of place and…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The COA restored the ET’s decision that Nadine was not an employee as a result, tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear her claim of unfair dismissal. The judge held that mutuality of obligation was present partially which would not amount to contract of employment because employer was not bound to provide her work and to pay wages. Secondly, Nadine was paid by her customers and did not receive sick pay, holiday pay and other benefits. All these factors are consistent with the claimant being a self-employed. There was no umbrella contract, however the EAT was wrongful to find.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nancy and Charles had four children which restricted Nancy. She was abused by Charles and became a drunk. Two of their children died from food poisoning. Charles left with their oldest child and left Nancy with his sick mother and their newborn. His mother died and eventually Charles returned with his new girlfriend and their oldest daughter, Melvina.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “The court case Hartsock et al. v. Rich’s employees credit union et al. takes about the “Uniform Commercial Code, expressly provides that an action for conversion of an instrument may not be brought by a payee or indorse who did not receive delivery of the instrument either directly or through delivery to an agent or a co-payee.” It explains why a payee to whom a check was never delivered has no action for conversion” (www.law.justia.com). Decisions The decision was that “Rich’s” was not at fault for the check being cashed by someone else and not by Singer. According to the case, there was no evidence to prove that Rich’s and Wachovia acted in concert with each other or with any other person or entity to accomplish an unlawful end or a lawful end by unlawful means.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In addition, the contract made no mention of the deed that was supposed to be executed in the sale. The court held that the omission of the type of deed to be executed did not make the contract voidable. They reasoned that the type of deed to be executed could be assumed. Id. at 395.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Which is why Ocwen never gave us a straight answer as to who holds this responsibility or who holds our note. FCRA Our claim arising under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681s was not added to the amended complaint because as Pro Se litigants, we learn as we go. We learned of the violations after we amended our complaint. Our ignorance should not give Ocwen 's illegal business practices a pass.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Despite this there is no clear meaning of what an absurd result is, therefore subjective as what may be absurd to one may be different to another. For example, in the R v Allen case, Allen would have thought being found guilty of bigamy was an absurd result. Furthermore, this rule could not be used in cases like Berriman as it was not absurd enough despite being unfair. The golden rule is also unpredictable as how can you follow word of statute if judges can change it to suit the requirements at the time. Lastly, it lacks guidelines as there is no criteria that judges need to follow apart from the fact it avoids an absurd result.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays