Doe V. Burd Case Study

Improved Essays
In Pennsylvania, a plaintiff claiming negligent infliction of emotional distress must establish one of these four situations: “1) that the defendant had a contractual or fiduciary duty; 2) plaintiff suffered a physical impact; 3) plaintiff was in a “zone of danger” and at risk of an immediate physical injury; or 4) plaintiff had a contemporaneous perception of tortious injury to a close relative.” Doe v. Phila. Cmty. Health Alternatives AIDS Task Force, 754 A.2d 25, 27 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2000). The first element does not apply to our client because there was no fiduciary or contractual duty relationship. Secondly, it could be argued that Nordlund suffered a physical impact because after Sumner’s accident, Nordlund could not eat, could not sleep …show more content…
In Sinn v. Burd, a mother who saw her daughter get hit by a car did have a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress even though she was thirty-six feet away from the accident. 486 A.2d at 150. Nordlund was sitting on her front porch, which was seventy feet away from the accident. R. 4. Seventy feet is a similar distance to thirty-six feet, therefore making Melanie located near the scene of the accident. The court also held in Krysmalski by Krysmalski v. Tarasovich, a mother was located near the scene when she was standing inside a grocery store and her children were run over in the parking lot. 622 A.2d 298, 129 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1993). The children were waiting outside the store entrance, while their mother was situated in the check-outline facing the lot. Id. While there was no specific distance given and the children were no longer located inside the store, the Court found that the mother was located close enough to the scene to be able to satisfy this prong. Finally, in Mazzagatti v. Everingham by Everingham, the mother was located a mile away from where her daughter was hit and was able to recover. 516 A.2d 672, 674 (Pa. 1986). Therefore, even though Nordlund was seventy feet from the street, she was closer than the mother in Mazzagatti and she was facing the accident similarly to the mother in Krymalski R.4. These three cases prove that …show more content…
The first part is whether the shock resulted from the direct emotional impact upon the plaintiff from the sensory and contemporaneous observance of the accident. In Yandrich v. Radic, the Court held the father was not successful in his claim because he did not have any type of sensory and contemporaneous observance of the accident. 495 A.2d 243, 251 (Pa. 1981). The son was struck by a vehicle while on his bicycle. Id. at 245. The father did not witness the accident and he was not in the immediate vicinity of the accident. Id. at 245, 251. However, in Neff v. Lasso, a wife that heard a crash and ran to the street to find her husband lying dead on the front lawn was able to recover from negligent infliction of emotional distress. 555 A.2d. 1304, 1305 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1989). The wife did not see the accident, but was able to recover because before the accident occurred she saw her husband’s truck and the car speeding behind his truck. Id. When she heard the crash, she was able to put the sight she saw before the crash and the sound of the crash together to infer that her husband got into an accident. Id. at 1305. Once she reached the scene and saw her husband’s body on the ground, she was able to confirm her inference. Id. The difference between these two cases is the foreseeability and the sense of hearing. It is not necessary to see the accident occur to be able

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The first case was for wrongful death damages for Benjamin and 5 children, second damages for physical and emotional injuries sustained by Benjamin and third damages for the physical injuries suffered by Mladinov. The defendant appealed. Issue: Whether the plaintiff is able to recover damages for his ‘mental and emotional distress’ caused by the wrongful death claim for his wife given that Benjamin suffered serious shock to his nervous system causing a gastric disturbance, yet…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Hitesman was a registered nurse and shift supervisor at Bridgeway, Inc, nursing home. He displayed concerns to management about that amount of infectious diseases within the nursing home. He claimed that the incidents of infections were rising at a disturbing rate. The management did not take care of the situation as he desired. Therefore, he told a television reporter about the problems in this nursing home.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    QUESTION PRESENTED 

 Whether Kaleigh Cyprus committed transfer intent with respect to Jack pursuant to A.R.S. section 13-203(B)(1) and State v. Ramirez . The phone was thrown towards another person involve, identified as Helena. In result it ended up hitting Jack BRIEF ANSWER 

 Yes, Kaleigh did commit assault because her intention was to throw the phone to Helena and with respect to Jack, she was not intentionally throwing the phone at him. Since Jack ended up sitting in that location and turning his head it resulted in the phone hitting him.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The injuries sustained in the Niles v City of San Rafael were foreseeable. The injuries resulted from the commission and the omission of act from the defendants. There was negligence in the city’s supervision of the school playground and medical malpractice at Mt. Zion Hospital. The medical negligence was nonfeasance meaning there was a failure to act when there is a duty to act as a reasonability to safeguard a person rights. The Plaintiff was an innocent party whom rights were violated by the defendants.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Honig vs. Doe (1988) In 1988, the concept of disciplining students with disabilities under the Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA), which is today considered the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA), was brought into question. The plaintiff, an emotionally disturbed (ED) child named John Doe, was suspended from school for choking another student. He claimed that his ED caused his misbehavior. As the school was deciding to expel him, they maintained his suspension.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Buck V. Bell Case Study

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Noted in supreme court cases, Relf v. Weinberger and Buck v. Bell, re-examining compulsory sterilization is pivotal in dismantling discrimination against women. Particularly affecting women of color, the multi-form occurrence is slowly moving into public consciousness along with the effects of settler colonialism. Depopulating foreign land through strategic movements, settler colonialists have been and continue to be clever as far as their tactics to establish political systems. Purposed to disadvantage the colonized and to benefit the colonizers, these systems have been founded upon the misery of Aboriginal peoples. Correspondingly, colonialism intricacies combined with eugenic principles continue to be used to legitimize colonial say in Indigenous women’s sexual and reproductive matters,…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Louisiana, Lillie would be able to recover under Louisiana Civil Code article 2315, which states in pertinent part “Every act whatever of man which causes damage to another obliges him by whose fault it happened to repair it.” La. C.C. 2315 allows someone who has been wronged, to be compensated for the damage caused to him or her. In order to recover under La. C.C. art. 2315, an intentional tort must have been committed. In the present case, Joe has committed the intentional tort of battery. A battery is defined as harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact.…

    • 1778 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In conclusion, it is unlikely that Cate will be able to recover for her NIED claim under the bystander theory. Under New York law, a plaintiff may recover from negligent infliction of emotional distress when he or she can prove that he or she became aware contemporaneously that an event has caused an injury to an immediate family while the plaintiff was in the zone of danger. Cate will fail to show that Jon is an immediate family because not only she is not a first-degree blood relative of Jon, she does not have a legal custody of him because he is an adult. Cate will be able to establish that she was in the zone of danger at the time of the accident because although she was not within the proximity from that allowed her to directly witness…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cause of this accident was the driver driving the wrong way at a high rate of speed and the car crashing into a pole and striking the curb. The driver was also intoxicated causing him to drive poorly. Based on the driver's actions of going the wrong way and multiple collisions one can conclude that the driver’s judgement was impaired due to substance abuse most likely of alcohol. We can also conclude because he was ejected from the car that he wasn’t wearing a seatbelt. If the driver hasn’t been speeding and driving while intoxicated he wouldn’t have been in this crash, and if he would have worn a seatbelt he might have survived the crash.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personal injury victims are usually left confused and bewildered after their accident. In addition to the physical discomfort and mental anguish stemming from the injury, there’s the added pressure that comes with not being aware of what to do in such a predicament. The best personal injury lawyers can alleviate some of the burden and clear up all the confusion. Not all personal injury solicitors are made equal though…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Requirements and Potential Defenses to Myra’s Claim Robyn Broadwater Kaplan University October 18, 2016 MEMORANDUM Date: October 18, 2016 To: Candie Cardigan, CEO, CARDWARE Inc. From: Robyn Broadwater Re: Negligence Requirements and Potential Defenses to Myra’s Claim ______________________________________________________________________________…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Leibeck Coffee Case

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The question is whether, Mrs. Liebeck, can receive compensatory damages for her second and third degree burn injuries that required medical treatment, her loss of life’s enjoyment, pain and suffering, and mental…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States v. Du Pont & Co. is the case usually referred to in connection with interchangeability of a product while determining a product market. In this case, the Appellant produced 75% of the cellophane sold in the US. But, cellophane constituted only 20% of the flexible packaging materials. The Supreme Court, therefore, affirming the lower court’s decision held that flexible packaging material constituted to be the relevant market since all these products are interchangeable.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Negligence tort occurs when one fails to demonstrate the kind of care a prudent and reasonable person would take under the identical circumstances and injury was birthed from the act or the absence of it. In order to justify that the defendant was negligent and therefore liable for one’s injuries, all 5 elements of tort ought to be satisfied. The 5 elements are: Duty, Breach of Duty, Cause in Fact, Proximate Cause and damages Jane v Luke Since Jane has suffered injuries, she in immediately classified under a primary victim. The first element is duty, whether it was owed to the plaintiff. The law acknowledges the relationship between the defendant and plaintiff, and the existing relation in turn may justify that the defendant is obliged to…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction Williams v Roffey Bros. is a leading case in English contract law. The appellant is Williams and the respondent is Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (contractors)Ltd. Facts In September 1985, the building contractor, Roffey Bros. & Nicholls Ltd., entered into a contract with Shepherds Bush Housing Association Ltd. to refurbish a block of flat, Twynholm Mansions, Lillie Road, London SW 6, and became is the main contractors for the works. Williams, the carpenter, was engaged to carry out the carpentry work of the 27 refurbished flats. Williams was originally engaged on three separate subcontracts, however, there are all superseded by a writing subcontract made on 21 January 1986.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays