Similarities Between Thoreau And Martin Luther King

Superior Essays
During times of political turmoil, very few ever had the courage to face the injustice. Courage such as that is few and far between. Two of these outliers were Henry Thoreau and Martin Luther King. Henry Thoreau was an American writer and poet who lived from 1817 to 1862. He was the author of numerous articles, including On the Duty of Civil Disobedience. From a different era, Martin Luther King, the leader of the civil rights movement in the 1950's and 1960's, wrote his Letter from Birmingham Jail exemplifying his moral purpose for his actions. Both Martin Luther King's Letter from Birmingham Jail and Henry Thoreau's On the Duty of Civil Disobedience were examples of captivating literature because of their broad use of strategies. King strengthened …show more content…
King starts out polite, therefore keeping the highly respected priests from ignoring his claim. "But since I feel that you are men of genuine good will and that your criticisms are sincerely set forth, I want to try and answer your statement in what I hope will be patient and reasonable terms". King continues being respectful then slowly builds until he is hypocritical. "But despite these notable exceptions, I must honestly reiterate that I have been disappointed with the church". He shows his disappointment in the church for their lack of action to help and support his cause. Thoreau, on the other hand, uses rhetorical questions. "Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once?". Thoreau does not use this because he expects an answer, but because he wants to show the audience how obvious their choice is. Do you fight an unjust law or allow it to continue? To build onto, he states "Why does it not encourage its citizens to put out its faults, and do better than it would have them"(945)? Thoreau uses this question to raise a valid point that to get the audience to ask themselves why isn't this happening. Overall, Kings organization was more effective. If King had not organized his letter the way he did, it is plausible that the priest would have put down his letter and stopped reading. Accordingly, King's claims would never have been considered. Thoreau's rhetorical questions did show the audience how simple their choices were and prove a point, yet it was not as imperative to the effect as Kings

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King JR. was famous for being a civil rights activist. This led him to write his famous “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. King’s letter responded to an article published by white clergymen who criticized King’s actions towards gaining equal rights for blacks. King’s letter presented his message through pathos and anaphora. Henry Thoreau, another great writer does not speak towards civil rights, but on the topic of the government.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the letter itself was a direct response to those clergymen, I believe the arguments it contained applied to a much wider audience. I think King’s work on this letter was rightfully influential. One reason for this was how articulately and precisely he took on each charge. An example of…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Amjad Badrah History 12 Letter from a Birmingham Jail When the Civil Right revolution reaches its maximum height in 1963, Br. King was leading protests in Birmingham. When the court ordered to stop the demonstrations, Dr. King who supported the law throughout his life, found it essential to break the unjust law for the very first time. As a result, he was arrested and held for not in contact for a day.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thoreau and King’s writings were both written during different time periods. In fact, King wrote his letter a whopping 114 years after Thoreau’s piece. Therefore, they present somewhat different issues happening in society. For example, Thoreau was upset with the government and President Polk’s involvement with the Mexican American War. On the other hand, King was disappointed with the church, the “white moderate”, and segregation happening all over the United States.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frederick Douglass differs from H. D. Thoreau in the sense that he doesn’t believe that all government is oppressive and manipulative. When it came to the issue of slavery, an injustice recognized by most, Douglass felt true in his convictions to do whatever possible to end such an inequality. He may have changed his opinion on the Constitution around 1851 once the issue of slavery became more of a prejudice than an oppressive institution centered around injustice towards people’s senses of equality and freedom. He clearly understood there to be a time for rebellion to the current system in place if everything isn’t reflective of the principles set out in the Declaration of Independence and the preamble of the Constitution. “It shall not avail that the Constitution and…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues in “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” that the government no longer does what it was created to do; subjects people to follow and support its decisions, without necessarily informing people of their choice; and limits the freedoms people have in society. Thoreau wants to convince his readers to begin thinking and living in the manner he does. His arguments ultimately lead his audience to experience feelings of injustice, and want to become more involved in deciding how they are governed through the use of civil…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argued against the government making their own decisions based of their own consciences, and not the people’s. Thoreau summarizes this with a quote, “That government is best which governs…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thoreau’s essay is also different from King’s because he presents more than one goal. Not only does he describe the government’s unfair laws, but he also teaches his readers how and why to revolt, and tells them to bring an end to the ongoing Mexican War. Despite these differences, both Thoreau and King share strong similar beliefs of morality and justice that are clearly seen throughout the entirety of both essays. Both authors in their respective essays tell the people why and how they should fight for justice. They explain that in order to fight for justice, we must first distinguish between the just and unjust laws.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thoreau criticizes the materialism of American society in a critical manner by implying that “government is best which governs less” (Thoreau 1) demonstrating his belief that government 's control its people for self benefit. Dr. King criticizes the government in a similar manner to Thoreau by directing his statement of “we have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God given rights” (King 3), which states himself as the voice of the oppressed which seek for equality. In addition, Dr. King envisions that “justice too long delayed is justice denied” (King 3), which explains his direct and aggressive approach toward the clergyman. As both direct each other’s audience in a logical attempt to leave the need to take action in any act of injustice, King uses his emotion and religious knowledge as part of his tone. His affecting intentions include his quotation, “by developing an unconscious bitterness… have to concoct an answer for a five year old son who is asking: ‘Daddy, why do white people treat colored people so mean?’” continuing with “when you are humiliated day in and day out by nagging signs reading ‘white’ and ‘colored’.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both men were put in jail for very different reasons. Thoreau was thrown in jail for crime that he believed was unjust. He didn't pay his poll tax. No matter how insignificant the law was, he thought the state was unjust for having the right to tax him.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wood insist the essay was a narrative and dramatic essay which caused critics to think his work was out of proportion and uninteresting. Wood thinks his focus and accomplish was too dramatic and narrative form, yet his work lacked the message to his essay on being a truly self-reliant man. Wood and other critics expected to read and get the message with more supporting details on civil disobedience rather than his experience and thoughts. Thoreau offered encouragement to the individual’s rights, to withdraw any support from a government whose policies are evil. He was such a moral thinker, did not fear possible consequences of civil disobedience against injustice.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It promotes prioritizing one 's consciousness over the law since government should be based upon conscience. He largely criticized the American social institutions and policies of the time, predominantly slavery and the Mexican American war, and in protest refused to pay his poll taxes. His justification was that if the government refused to improve their flawed manners then “"It is not a man 's duty, as a matter of course, to devote himself to the eradication of any, even the most enormous wrong” but it is “his duty, at least, to wash his hands of it, and...not to give it practically his support.” Thoreau exposes how government is an expedient which solely exists because the people have allowed this body to execute their will, though it is not immune to misuse. Government is meant to protect individual freedoms and so when these are infringed upon, man 's obligation is to ideologically detach himself from it.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Much like Paine, Thoreau would not be bullied into violating what he believed to be right. Thoreau was also vehemently against slavery, something else he wrote about in Civil Disobedience. “There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them.” (1865) This could also be seen as a critique of society.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As someone who is being governed by a government he finds unjust, Thoreau believes we must object to anything we find morally wrong. He claims the public must rely on their morals, and conscience to stand up to a government that does not rely on morals and…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He writes that he tries to give as little thought as possible to the government. Thoreau still believes that the government can improve; he gives credit to the Constitution, the law, the courts, and even the government, nothing that these are all things for which to be grateful. Democracy, though, is not the final step of achieving an ideal government; once the government realizes and values the role of the individual and his or her power, and treats him or her with the required respect, it will be able to advance and change for the better. To concretize his point and make it relatable to readers, Thoreau uses metaphor, a rhetorical device that compares two objects, to prove a point. In “Civil Disobedience”, he employs this device in order to prove a point about the government; by comparing the government to objects, Thoreau subtly acknowledges its incompetence and uselessness.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays