Reasonable Suspicion To Stop And Frisk Essay

Improved Essays
The legal significance of "reasonable suspicion" to stop and frisk an individual versus "probable cause" to arrest and individual. Reasonable suspicion is the presumption a crime has been committed or will happen. Based on the evidence informed by police officers experience and interpretation. But, is less than probable cause to an arrest. Probable cause, holds a belief given by facts and more of concrete evidence of a crime. For example, police need reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk and individual. While, in probable cause must exist if the police obtain a search warrant. However, Law enforcement officers do not have to have justification to stop someone on a public street to ask questions. Under the Fourth Amendment; individuals are …show more content…
One, search incident to lawful arrest; a police officer may search the area surrounding the person within their reach. For example, a person is arrested for driving intoxicated after being pulled over. A vehicle search conducted to find ten grams of cocaine in the glove compartment and a illegal handgun in the trunk. The cocaine is admissible evidence and handgun being excluded because, it was an unreasonable search. Not requiring a search warrant to be issued. Two, plain view exception; no warrant can be obtained if evidence is seized in the location from, where the perception is viewed from. For example, law enforcement officers are called to the Rodriguez 's house by, neighbors who see him beating is wife Jenny. Entering the house, police notice a illegal handgun on the table not loaded. Without a search warrant, they arrested Mr. Rodriguez for battery and illegal guns being seized. The search warrant must be issued to search specific areas or persons. Three, consent; a person can give an officer to have authority to search or seizure. Four, Stop and Frisk: An officer can stop a suspect as long as there is a reasonable suspicion. Five, Automobile exception: a warrant is not required to search vehicles, if there is probable cause. The automobile exception, does allow the search of a boat to be searched. (National Paralegal College,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Consent searches are when the suspect gives permission to be searched. Exigent circumstances are okay only when ca officer feels it was an emergency then no probable cause or warrant is needed. Stop and frisk searches are when the cops believe they are dealing with a dangerous person. Plain view searches is whe something illegal is right there in plain view of the officer to be used a evidence while making an arrest during a crime scene. Open field searches are when the open field and pastures are not protected by the constitution can be searched.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arizona case, highlight the requirements of a search and seizure under the fourth amendment . In this case , the supreme court describes that police officers cannot search a vehicle without a warrant unless the police officers believe that the arrestee has had access to the vehicle after the was arrested. Yet, if the officer is certain that the arrestee had access to the car after been placed under arrests and it contains evidence. This is the only exception the Supreme court establish a search in a car passenger compartment. But in Gant V. Arizona there was no evidence that the police need to search because Gant did not have access to the car after been detained.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the criminal justice system, such things as consensual contact, detention and probable cause are important to for law enforcement. To know the difference between each could be difference between enforcing the law and letting someone go. According to Robertson and Wallace, consensual contact is defined as when an individual is not detained by the police and the police have not had any manner recommend to that individual and is not free to end the encounter and withdraw from. There are two types of detentions. Terry-Type Detention is defined as an arrest from a stop-and-frisk situation, while Temporary Detention is defined for questioning that is not considered to be an arrest.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court also had to ensure that what the officer action was when the shots on the moving vehicle was justifiable. The fourth amendment was not violated in this case. the eighth amendment was the challenge to determine was there excessive cruelty to the Free suspect. The court had to Justified through the law what was the law on pursuing a fleeing suspect. The court also had to justified was an officer or the community in any kind of harm's way in the attempt to subdue or detained the suspect.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The criminal justice process begins with the commission of a crime. A crime is the act in which the law has been violated. Often when a crime occurs, it is not immediately noticed by law enforcement. Crimes are normally reported by the victim or another citizen who witnessed the crime. For serious crimes such as felonies, police officers must have knowledge, facts, and circumstances which would allow a person of reasonable caution to believe that a crime has been committed (State, 2013).…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The police must determine a crime happened and establish probable cause from there, it is irrelevant where the suspect in question is currently located. The location of the suspect to be arrested has no bearing on whether or not he/she committed the alleged crime. Therefore, the police establishing probable cause as to the suspect 's location is unneeded. Search warrants are issued upon probable cause to include any areas in which items sought after can be found. Hypothetically speaking, An officer creates a search warrant for evidence related to, a financial scheme.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peradventure, that the police are serving a legal warrant to pick up robbery suspect who also is a known drug dealer, because of the exclusionary rule from Mapp v. Ohio when the police arrive at the suspect address, they are not allow to search the home looking for drugs unless the warrant stipulates. Because of the Supreme Court’s ruling, Mapp v. Ohio complicates law enforcement with bureaucracy and suppresses simple law enforcement.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Warrantless Searches Essay

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Warrantless searches include: consent, plain-view, search incident prior to an arrest, exigent circumstances, automobile exception, and hot pursuit (Justia: Criminal Law, n.d). If consent is given voluntarily by a person then the area may be searched without a warrant. For example, if police want to search someone’s backpack and the person agrees to them searching there is no need for a search warrant. Plain-view is like stated earlier if an object is out in plain sight then the item can be seized as evidence. However, it must be completely in plain sight, an officer is not allowed to move an item to gain access or see another.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Fremont Weeks concluding that searching his residence without a warrant was unconstitutional and violating his fourth amendment rights. The United States Supreme Court decision would become the exclusionary rule barring the admission of evidence illegally obtained. The United States Supreme Court influenced the police by regulating how they conduct their searches in the future. A reasonable search is considered when the police have probable cause to believe that they can find evidence that you committed a crime and the judge may grant police a search warrant. Prior to Fremont Weeks case all of the evidence obtained regardless how it was seized was allowed all relevant evidence, regardless of how it was obtained.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The evidence obtain during the search of John Smith vehicle should not be admissible in court and a motion to suppress should be file. The Fourth Amendment protects against unlawful search and seizures applies to routine traffic stops as in this case. Officer Roberts should have had probable cause that a crime has been committed in order to search and gather evidence without a valid search warrant. Officer Roberts pull John Smith over because he thought there was an obstruction in his windshield this could be argued as probable cause, but he did not know if his search would justify the issuance of a warrant. When discovered that the obstruction was a disability badge there was no reason to continue with the traffic stop.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays