Same Sex Marriage: The Future Of Gay Marriage

Improved Essays
The 1990’s were a spectacular time for many people. With pop culture exploding, feminism at a high, and many people settling down and starting a family, everything seemed perfect. However, others were not having the same joy, particularly the LGBT community. Many of them were still living in fear of rejection from society on coming out as gay as well as struggling for their right to marry. The fight for them was just beginning, but their battle would do much for the future of gay marriage. In fact, gay marriage changed from the pressure coming from people’s opinions on same-sex marriage, which prompted some states to change their laws, while others had chosen not to; the controversy caught the attention of the Supreme Court, and in time, was …show more content…
Individual’s opinions shaped and changed gay marriage legalization because without others opinions, the topic would not have reached the federal eye. Many opinions arose throughout the course for marriage equality. The main idea that guided the topic was being for gay marriage. This group believed that everyone should be offered equal marriage rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. They also wanted the same benefits as heterosexual couples, like Social Security. Another opinion was the opposition of gay marriage. These people believed that gay marriage disrupted religious beliefs because the bible stated that only a man and a woman could marry. People against same sex marriage also stated that a couple can only have sex if their intentions are to have a baby, but because same sex couples cannot do this, they are sinful. However, many shifted their opinion as the fight continued. According to a recent polling survey, in the year of 2003, 55% of the majority of American’s believed that same-sex couples should not be recognized under the law. In the same year only 37% of the majority believed that same-sex couples should have the same rights as heterosexual couples. In the year of 2013, the public’s belief had changed drastically. Now, 58% of the majority stated that they now supported gay marriage (“ABC News”). In 10 years, more than half of the population had changed their opinion on the topic. As the …show more content…
Furthermore, without people’s opinions shifting, there would have been no pressure on the federal government to change their marriage laws. With people’s opinions, came the need to change federal government laws. However, there was a long process to get even the first state legalization of same-sex marriage.
The beginning of government change began in 1993 when a case in Hawaii was brought forth saying that the state 's refusal of handing out marriage licenses in Hawaii broke the right of equal treatment. Hawaii then began handing out same sex licenses and caught the public 's eye. Since there were still many American’s who disagreed on same-sex marriage, they became frantic that same-sex couples would go to Hawaii to marry. In order to be certain this did not occur, Congress passed an act called The Defense of Marriage Act of 1996. This act stated that same-sex marriage would not have to be recognized in other states if their laws did not approve of it. The act also said that same-sex marriage would not be

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    There have been several times within American politics where the rights of groups of people have been fought over. These types of fights have been spread over the course of America’s history the most well known being the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. One of the most recent of these fights was the repeal of California’s Proposition 8, originally titled the “California Marriage Protection Act,” which only affected same-sex couples. Proposition 8 was a proposal for an amendment addition to the California constitution stating “only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California,” creating controversy between groups. The California Supreme Court saw that “limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples,” was violating…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hodges and Loving v. Virginia that were similar. In both cases the petitioners traveled out of state to marry. Upon returning, they were both deprived of their personal liberties. Although the liberty is different specifically, both were charged under the Due Process Clause. Both their states were depriving them of either justice or discrimination, which in return is why both petitioners in each case fought back against their state to fight for their rights. The case of Loving v. Virginia changed what the concept of marriage was. Marriage was first between a man and a woman of the same race. That is what marriage stood for in the early years, no interchanging races. However with this case, interracial marriage became legal. What was once forbidden and different became normal. This opened the door for change, and showed that changing marriage, something that had been around for ages was possible. With Obergefell v. Hodges, the concept of marriage was also changed, two people of the same- sex can now marry each other. The talk of making interracial marriage legal impacted how the ruling of Obergefell v. Hodges turned out. People realized that steering away from the traditional concept of marriage in the 21st century was completely acceptable and that same-sex marriage could be the next step. Same as in Loving v. Virginia, Obergefell v. Hodges also had a connection between marriage and liberty, which made it easier for the court to…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Restraint Essay

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As we know about the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices, coming from varied religious and ethnic backgrounds with six males and three females. Presidents nominate Justices for life tenure and they must be confirmed by majority vote of the Senate. According to NY Times article that has the title” Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide”, on June 27th, the US Supreme Court decided 5-4 that same-sex couples have a ‘fundamental’ right to marry, and thus overturned the laws of at least 17 states. In this assignment, I will discuss the arguments both for and against judicial activism vs. judicial restraint, using the 2015 gay marriage case of OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26, 2015, LBGT+ activist groups rejoiced as the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage believing that a ban of it violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution. This didn’t help stop any hatred of same-sex couples and it seemed that the world would implode due to the court’s decision However, backlash soon followed, leading to an Appeals court, saying it didn’t violate the 14th amendment and many “Christian” groups saying the ruling by the Supreme Court goes against the bible. In the case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, the ruling has influenced the United States to take steps in a more progressive future where everyone has equal rights and helping America begin its transition into a more positive light with supporting this decision.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nelson case, the Supreme Court revisited the issue of same sex marriage in the case Obergefell v. Hodges and the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the legalization of same sex marriage in a 5-4 split decision. The majority rule believed that the 14th Amendment was being violated when couples of the same gender were applying for marriage licenses and getting denied. They believe that all people no matter what sexual orientation you are, have the right to marry and that it is a freedom that all people should have. On the other hand, the minority thought differently, the four judges who voted on same sex marriage being unconstitutional all wrote their own dissenting opinion behind there justification to vote against same sex marriage. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his dissenting opinion that, “Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea, should be of no concern to us. Under the Constitution, judges have power to say what the law is not what the law should be.”(Dissenting Opinions in the Supreme Court’s Same Sex Marriage Ruling) John Roberts is saying that it should not be up to the Judicial Branch and the Supreme Court to make laws, they should only be able to interpret them. John Roberts and all of the other dissenting justices have a similar opinion that, with this ruling, they are making a law for same sex marriage, not interpreting the Constitution. They also think that legalization of same-sex marriage should be voted on by each individual state and not legalized throughout all 50 states. John Roberts also says, “Five Lawyers, deemed themselves chosen, to burst the bonds of history” .”(Dissenting Opinions in the Supreme Court’s Same Sex Marriage Ruling) He is saying that this is not the Supreme Court 's decision to decide the law on same-sex marriage and individual states should vote on whether they think it is legal or not. The dissenting justices bring up a very valid point that it is not there…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Obergefell v. Hodges case is one of the most controversial. As is the case with all issues, there are at least two sides. This is no different as the Supreme Court received praise and applause for breaking a social barrier. They also received criticism for straying from tradition and supporting an undesirable group of people. An article by Faber and Strano (2015) details how leaders of some of the less supportive states felt after the decision. Arkansas and Texas officials were unsupportive of the legalizing of homosexual marriage. The Kentucky and Missouri officials were very supportive of the ruling. In this regard, the adversarial nature of this nation is exposed. In almost all aspects there are two sides,…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This 2015 landmark Supreme Court case questions the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans and is the consolidation of six federal cases from the Fourth Circuit. In district court, judges found in favor of the same-sex couples. However, the Fourth Circuit court reversed these rulings and found same-sex marriage bans constitutional under the doctrine of stare decisis with regards to the 1971 landmark case Baker v. Nelson, wherein the Supreme Court implicitly endorsed the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans by dismissing the case (different from not issuing certiorari), tacitly upholding the Minnesota Supreme Court’s rationale that the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans is a political question.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The year was 1958. The clock read 2 hours past midnight, July 11th. Richard and Mildred Loving woke up to the blaring noises of police cars outside the doors of their lovely Virginia home. The newlyweds, who had gotten married just a month before, were being arrested for being in violation of the state of Virginia’s anti-miscegenation law. The night of July 11th marked the Lovings' 9-year long battle against outlawed interracial marriage in Virginia. The Loving case served as an inspiration to many individuals who had not dared to break such societal norms and encouraged a rise in interracial marriage in the United States. The Lovings vs the state of Virginia case impacted the rise in interracial marriage in the late 1990s…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a very interesting topic for me and a very personal one as well. It hits home for those that are dear to me that there are so many challenges that we have to face on a daily basis regarding the issue of what is legal, moral, and thereof. I think that throughout the United States and across the country that there are many government officials and administration that are faced with the decisions of having to change many rules, policies, and regulation to accommodate the new law that grant same sex individuals and couples the same equal rights and protection to be in a union or marriage like that of the traditional marriage of that of a man and woman. There has been many challenges from many interest groups that was either against or for the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kim Davis A Villain

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When the Supreme Court decided to recognize the various marriages of same-sex couples nationwide on June 26, 2015, not everyone was applauding the significant event. While thousands of people across America flooded the streets with joy there were still those who believed allowing such marriages was against “God’s law,” and of those people was Kim Davis. Davis, a county clerk in Rowan, Kentucky, decided to “uphold “God’s law” by denying same-sex couples (and now all couples) marriage licenses.”(Moodie-Mills, 2015, para.6). Some say that Davis is a new civil rights hero, while others claim that she is no star for justice. Although the argument that expands on her fight for religious liberty holds sound logic, the…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same Sex Amendment Essay

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Back when settlers first came to the new world they were in search of religious freedom. No longer wanted to live under the rule of Great Britain, they left for the unknown. American was founded on the belief that once you become a U.S. citizen you are free. Although, the constitution was put in place to make sure that the “freedoms” do not get too out of hand. In today’s age some of these laws have restricted people from living the life that their ancestors risked their lives for. Everyone deserves the freedom to live their life happily. This is why I support the notion to amend the amendment against same sex marriage.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Discriminatory Laws

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On June 12, 1967 the Supreme Court of the United States decided declared Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statutes unconstitutional, ending all race-based legal restrictions on marriage in the United States. Up until this point it was unlawful in 16 states to marry outside of your race and could and would be punishable with jail time (rhapsodyinbooks, 2009). Fast forward nearly 40 years later and we, as a country, are seeing laws being…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The elimination of states would abolish such a relationship between citizens and all levels of government. Included within a states ability to connect citizens to level of government perceived as distant, they also protect their citizens from an overpowering federal government. In Enduring Features of Federalism, Derthick suggests that the removal of states would dissolve the level of government most responsible for initiating contact with federal institutions through “talking back.” She writes, “This appeal to the states to talk back is not a call to defiance, but a call to engage federal officials in a policy dialogue…” However, the function of states as protectors of citizens rights through talking back has continually faced challenges. Ultimately, Supreme Court decisions have reshaped the extent to which states may talk back on certain issues. In cases such as Obergefell v. Hodges, federal law required all states to acknowledge same-sex marriage. States in opposition of the federal law were incapable of talking back due to the constitutional right of federal law to supersede state law (Jillson 79). Although arguments over power continue between state and federal levels, it is necessary to have a state present to connect individuals to higher government and…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2003 Massachusetts was the first state to legalize same-sex marriage. Prior to the U.S. Supreme court ‘s 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling, the state of same-sex marriage in America was always in flux. From early beginnings, both proponents and opponents of same-sex marriage have asserted controversial arguments. Before the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Oct. 6, 2014, declining to hear the case of same-sex marriage. Thirty-one states have either constitutionally or statutory provisions that explicitly defined marriage as one man and one women. Only nineteen states and the District of Columbia allowed same-sex marriage. Many attorneys dropped the case on banning same-sex marriage. Utah was the first to enact a Defense of Marriage Act…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kramer, Larry.Same-sex marriage, conflict of laws, and the unconstitutional public policy exception. Yale Law Journal. May 1997, v.106, n7, 1965-2008…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics