Comparing Marx And Rousseau's Civilization

Improved Essays
The social, political and economic characteristics define the civilization of a particular community. Several theories have been advanced within various fields to explain the advent of human socialization and their thinking. These include Freud, who believed that men formed societies for strength; Rousseau who asserted that individuals possess instincts bringing them together; and Karl Max, who asserted that indicated that human beings struggled over a series of classes. More specifically, this paper focuses on Freud’s civilization in social contracts in relation to that of Rousseau and Karl Max.
Freud followed that every situations created by the different desires which are prolonged, there is a creation of a feeling entailing mild content. Civilization creates a law which governs every individual among themselves through creation of equal rights. On the other hand, Rousseau argues that social contract helps individuals communicate among themselves in a way that there is creation of defense and protection. This enables the members of a given community to be able to obey themselves and remain free as before (Sol, 1789). Man is enslaved in such a way that the obstacles which entail the human preservation have been made greater, in that people cannot
…show more content…
There are different healthy states from a pathological viewpoint, where there is no boundary between ego and object (Hergenhahn, 2009). The oceanic feeling is categorized as being regressed to an earlier feeling. Freedom and power entail the major part of self-preservation (Sol, 1789). As people live in community, they alienate themselves with their rights. The situation will be able to be equal in the community only if the people estrange themselves. No one will have to make the situation worse once everyone is in lie with the rules. If one member is offended then the whole political body is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau was a very influential Genevan philosopher in the early 18th century. Rousseau believed that man was born equal however society and advancements in mankind created inequality. Furthermore, Rousseau states that there are two different types of inequality; the first inequality being natural inequality, which is established by nature and consists in the difference of physical features and qualities of mind, and the second being political inequality, which depends on a kind of convection and is authorized by the consent of men. I agree with Rousseau’s argument that contemporary social relationships, such as monogamy, are not natural to human beings and that other forms of relationship would occur in other social arrangements,…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to The Social Contract, once people can no longer survive in a primitive state, they willingly enter the social contract, and lose their animalistic ways. According to Rousseau, “Man loses by the social contract his natural liberty, and an unlimited right to all that tempts him, and which he can obtain; in return he acquires civil liberty, and proprietorship of all he possesses… In addition we might add to the other acquisitions of the civil state that of moral liberty, which alone renders a man master of himself; for it is slavery to be under the impulse of mere appetite, and freedom to obey a law in which we prescribe for ourselves” (Rousseau, 79-80). Unlike Locke, Rousseau believed that…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Rousseau, Chapter 1). Moreover, Rousseau imagined that humans turned rational and selfish once the vices of civilization and their interactions with…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Rousseau’s argument, men cannot be as free as they are in the state of nature in modern society and asserts that that institutions and structures in modern society contradict the freedom and natural goodness of man. Yet, a specific government may be able to provide its members with a certain amount of freedom that somewhat amounts to that present in the state of nature. He writes, in regards to the role of government, “Find a form of association which defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and by means of which each one, while uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before” (Rousseau, 148). The ultimate goal of the government is to ensure the natural freedom of its societal members. The law put forth from the government should be a reflection of the general will of the community.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau believes that a social contract is needed in order to preserve the community as it is becoming hard for everyone to survive on their resources…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When examining the question of whether John Rawls would consider Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s ideal society in the Social Contract fair, it is important to not only understand Rousseau’s ideal society more closely, but also understand what Rawls defines as being fair. First, the society that Rousseau proposes as the ideal one is based off of his concept of the nature of men. Men are born free and it is society that enslaves them, therefore, the goal of his ideal society is one that protects the people while also maintaining them as free as they were in nature. While to many philosophers maintaining security means renouncing some of an individual’s freedom, Rousseau believes that society can have one without the expense of the other. This only happens…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The idea of freedom in Jean Jacque Rousseau’s The Social Contract (1762) is present throughout the book and Rousseau’s own, personal understanding of freedom underpins his argument for his ideal state. In this essay I will argue that individual citizens aren’t truly free in every sense in Rousseau’s state as the sovereign has complete dominion over public matters and due to the sovereign explicitly being composed of every citizen, this could lead to nearly every problem being deemed within the public realm. Furthermore, one cannot be individually free, in my opinion, when one cannot voice dissent against the prevailing convention of society, as is the case in Rousseau’s state. To argue this thesis effectively I will explore what freedom means…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Contracts Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Charles W. Mills have identified parts of our society that have formed sorts of informal contracts about how society sees the world. In Rousseau’s The Social Contract, the first societies are discussed with the colonization of the new world. The differences in the civilization of the people and their subsequent treatment is examined. In Mills’ The Racial Contract, the treatment of different races is examined and historical reason for it is given.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many thinkers in the 1800s had some similar views on how society should be, but also differences about it too. Two major social theorists that have commonalities and differences are Henri de Saint-Simon and Karl Marx. Saint Simon was a French theorist who believed in a merit based society with science progressing society forward. Karl Marx was a German theorist who believed that industrialism was destroying society and communism was the best idea for the individuals and societies. Although their ideal societies differed in more ways than not, they had similar goals when it came to fulfillment within oneself.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social theorists, writers and philosophers of almost every time period have examined the convoluted relationship between social relations and individuals including Karl Marx and Georg Simmel. While some have taken the approach that individuals are shaped by their social world, others insist that the social world itself is what shapes individuals. There are a few theories that exist with regards to the connection between individuals and society which will be discussed throughout this short essay in order to fully explain the relationship between individuals and society. Starting off with the conflict theory by Karl Marx, he was primarily focused on the structures of society. The conflict theory is one of the fundamental ideologies that explains social life as a battle between social groups for power and scarce resources.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx share the political and economical ideology that private property separates society into classes, and creates oppression. However, the two view property in different regards. Rousseau views property in a more political view, while Marx focuses more on the economic sphere of property and society. This paper will first state Rousseau and his critique of property, inequality, and the emergence of society found in The Discourses. Then, it will contrast the political critique of Rousseau with that of Karl Marx’s economic critique regarding property, and include other critical parts of Marx’s work including the Jewish Question and the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Today, various forms of government exist across the world as remnants and variations of the original ideals developed years ago by historic philosophers like John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and James Harrington. Philosophers have played a substantial role in the development of law and government over the course of history in roughly every civilization and they basically served as innovators in the field of moral principles, ethics, and human rights. One of the larger political innovations of the past that heavily affects the America 's today was based upon original ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Rousseau, a famous French politic and philosopher of the 1700s during the French Revolution, was an individual who believed in the development of a government…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Comparing Rousseau and Mill on Liberty In this essay, I would like to contrast and compare the concept of liberty in Jean Jacques Rousseau's “the Social Contract Theory”, which was written in 1762 and J.S. Mill's On liberty, which was written in 1859. In a fact, the authors were born different century and also, had different ideas. They were successfully influence the society by sharing their ideas. In the writings, both Rousseau and Mill mainly discourses about the relationship between authority and one's liberty. First, I would like to examine both Rousseau's and Mill's schemas and then compare their thoughts.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays