Similarities And Differences Of Henri De Saint Marx And Karl Marx

Improved Essays
Many thinkers in the 1800s had some similar views on how society should be, but also differences about it too. Two major social theorists that have commonalities and differences are Henri de Saint-Simon and Karl Marx. Saint Simon was a French theorist who believed in a merit based society with science progressing society forward. Karl Marx was a German theorist who believed that industrialism was destroying society and communism was the best idea for the individuals and societies. Although their ideal societies differed in more ways than not, they had similar goals when it came to fulfillment within oneself. “Saint Simon was a theorist who believed in a competitive free market and that an elite group should coordinate society” (Sniezek, …show more content…
They both believed in their ideal society, that the individuals were happy and fulfilled in their work and in society. “Like early socialists [i.e. Saint-Simon] Marx holds the view that the overall progress of society is due to technological progress, although the technology has been misused by the capitalists for the fulfillment of their narrow and sectarian economic purposes” (politicalsciencenotes.com). Harriet Martineau is considered one of the first female sociologists. She looked at the injustices and inequalities in society and advocated that sociologists should not just look at these problems but find solutions to them. Her emphasis was on individual happiness, the factors that contributed to that and social equality as a way to progress society. She believed the more autonomy one had, the more happier they were. Her observations about injustices and ideas about autonomy, happiness and inequality are still relevant to this day …show more content…
Martineau would argue that we would need to change laws, change social thoughts and social patterns. Change laws to make sure everyone has equal rights (this would be specified more towards gays/same sex couples); change social thought in order to then change the laws and patterns. If we keep our same mindset about social injustices, we cannot progress ourselves and our society into an autonomous one. By changing our thoughts, we then change our social patterns, which can then lead to more freedom, equality and autonomy, which thereby creates progress in society. Martineau stated that sociologists should not just observe the patterns/injustices, but that they should do something about them. What she believed was that autonomy, was to be able to make one’s own decisions without the input of the law or society. She looked at important issues and spoke out about them, when others would not. She looked at and wrote about womens rights in the UK and slavery and justice in the US. If Martineau was present in modern day society, she would see similar issues that she saw in her time mixed with new issues and would seek to change these injustices to progress

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Her main efforts were concentrated in areas of “citizenship, education and interracial cooperation”(We Seek to Know, pg 95). Her efforts were acknowledged by leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr. who noted “she understood that if we could break through the illiteracy, we could break into mainstream…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Two different progressive authors which will be compared are Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft. To begin, Rousseau’s beliefs of what type of equality is important to Wollstonecraft’s beliefs of importance are similar in many ways. Some similarities are of how society should be and…

    • 45 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This gave her the opportunity to voice out for all the women who felt the same way as she did. She adds extreme focus on the point of freedom by comparing herself to the colonies. The colonies were fight to be their own nation, and make their own laws. While she was fighting to have a voice in what was occurring in the revolution, and what should be fixed in the new laws for woman and…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She was able to examine two groups which she was a part of. These groups were case study of the Boston based Bread and Roses collective. By doing this she was able to reveal the difference between black women and white, learning that Black sisters of the women movement felt processioned. This would not allow them to feel equal with white women. This led to join the black panther movement embracing that, black in fact was beautiful.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the seventeen hundred, there were different thoughts on what women are expected to do. Such issues are made on the questions of why women were created and what their duties are in society. However, in the twentieth century, there are no longer as any women issues as there was back then. One of the big issues back then was that woman were not to be treated equally to men. This was specifically talked about by two enlightenment thinkers named Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    YeJoon Kang HST 103_06 Professor Borbonus 10 February 2015 Karl Marx & Samuel Smiles During the time of Industrialization, Europe and the United States were the leading exporters in the global markets. It was most difficult for the working class when there was an abundant amount of supplies, also known as surplus of products once in demand. One of many reasons they were suffering was because; “As more and more factories were built to produce the same commodity…competitors slashed prices by slashing wages” (Marks 136). Many similar problems were practiced in the time.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of her most important accomplishments was helping expand mental hospitals. Her eyes opened to this opportunity when she volunteered at prisons and saw all the people there that were only there because of no room in hospitals. She believed this was unfair that the mentally ill were being criminalized because of their sickness. After also visiting mental hospitals she talked to people about her experience, whom then told her to talk to the important men in her community…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Elizabeth Blackwell Essay

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages

    She held lectures and argued the rights women should be getting. Her speeches diligently focused on how both genders should be equal. No matter how much hate surrounded her and the backlash she faced, there was no way she was going to back down from her stance in the idea. Her activism increased the amount of people to notice and take ideas from her. The life of this individual shows how one idea and one person could result into an everlasting…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She dedicated her life to helping those in impoverished and in need of jobs. She believed that women should be given the ability to have jobs in factories just like…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She was a revolutionary; she risked her life numerous times in order to help other people escape. She wanted freedom and that’s what she achieved, she took her life into her own hands challenging the system of slavery. Due to her contributions during the era of slavery,…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim are two of the founding figures of sociology. They were the first to explore the relationship between the economy and society in the nineteenth and twentieth century, each developing different perspectives of society. Despite them having significantly different views on modern capitalism, they both played a prominent role in the development of sociology as an academic discipline. This essay provides a biography of Marx and Durkheim and the major works they published. It then focuses on the intellectual and historical contributions they have made and how their works are still influential to contemporary society.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The arrest and her time in jail was brief, a woman heavily reputed in the African American community, her single act of defiance sparked a movement that ended segregation in America; she was to be adored and forever admired by activists for freedom everywhere. Unknowingly, she would become one of the most famous names to be associated with the Post World War II, Era of Civil Rights. Her childhood brought her experiences with discrimination and helped…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Rawls and Karl Marx both see equality as an important value in human society; indeed, they both see it as something people are entitled to and as the foundation upon which the ideal society is built. However, they diverge drastically in how they conceptualize the way an egalitarian society would operate and how they believe such a society could be achieved. Concerning the former, Marx envisioned a communist utopia, whereas Rawls was a strong believer in liberal democracy. In terms of the latter, Marx was a staunch believer in proletarian revolution, while Rawls believed in perfecting the existing system through democratic reforms. Their contrasting visions stem partly from the different periods in which they wrote.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx share the political and economical ideology that private property separates society into classes, and creates oppression. However, the two view property in different regards. Rousseau views property in a more political view, while Marx focuses more on the economic sphere of property and society. This paper will first state Rousseau and his critique of property, inequality, and the emergence of society found in The Discourses. Then, it will contrast the political critique of Rousseau with that of Karl Marx’s economic critique regarding property, and include other critical parts of Marx’s work including the Jewish Question and the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays