A Psychologist’s View: Rogerian Argument First off, I had never thought of a professor of psychologist being so knowledgeable about the problems of communication. However, after Rogers explains his background on the subject it makes perfect sense. The next thing that really impressed me in his essay was the examples he used. All of his points throughout the essay made so much more sense after he used simple examples to break down what he meant. Overall I agree with the majority of what Rogers is stating throughout the essay. I especially agree with his initial hypothesis that the “major barrier to mutual interpersonal communication is our very natural tendency to judge, to evaluate, to approve or disapprove” (Barnet, 2014, p.
A Psychologist’s View: Rogerian Argument First off, I had never thought of a professor of psychologist being so knowledgeable about the problems of communication. However, after Rogers explains his background on the subject it makes perfect sense. The next thing that really impressed me in his essay was the examples he used. All of his points throughout the essay made so much more sense after he used simple examples to break down what he meant. Overall I agree with the majority of what Rogers is stating throughout the essay. I especially agree with his initial hypothesis that the “major barrier to mutual interpersonal communication is our very natural tendency to judge, to evaluate, to approve or disapprove” (Barnet, 2014, p.