Robert Nozick's Hedonism: What Is A Good Life?

Improved Essays
According to hedonism, a life is good to the extent that it is filled with happiness (pleasure) and bad to the extent it is filled with unhappiness (pain). It is important to note that hedonists are not referring to physical pleasure as the key to the good life, rather, they are referring to it as enjoyment (attitudinal pleasure). Another way to interpret this is by saying that a good life is having many pleasurable experiences and nothing else. A hedonist might say that if you enjoy doing something, then doing so is pleasurable, so your life is good. Well, according to Robert Nozick, a very famous philosopher, a good life is not just about having a good time, it’s about having a true time. There are other intrinsic goods we value such as truth, self-discovery, and autonomy, therefore hedonism is false.
Nozick provided a very well-known argument in an attempt to examine hedonism, the ‘Experience Machine’, which is basically an experiment concerning simulated experiences. This machine is the ultimate virtual reality headset which creates life-like simulations that
…show more content…
By plugging into the machine you would just be what Nozick calls “an intermediate blob” with “no answer to the question of what a person is like” (Nozick, 28). Your life would only consist of experiencing fake experiences with no actual interaction with other human beings; a world without relations, responsibility, love, goals and many other things that mold us into who we are as a person. Responsibility helps you develop good character, relations make you feel protected, love motivates you to be the best person you can be for your loved ones, and your goals take you forward in life. None of this is accomplishable if you spend your entire life in the machine, so it may very well be “a kind of suicide” (Nozick,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    It does not necessarily involve notions of pleasure, wealth, and honor, since even individuals who acquire the physical goods may not be happy. Humans are rightly guided in life by our natural preference for engaging…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hedonist do not agree with this. They believe that things can only harm an individual if those thing lead that individual to be unhappy. Unhappiness, in itself, is bad for human beings. However, it seems that it could possibly also be a symptom of the loss of something with value to the well being of our lives. Things other than happiness can directly make a difference in an individual’s well…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Being linked up to Nozick's experience machine could present future problems. Because what if you linked up to the experience machine at an age of immaturity? The problem then would be the thoughts, hopes, and ideas you had for your life as a younger person; may not be the same thing you want in your life as an older person. When I was a younger man, I wanted to be Micheal Jackson; that would certainly not be a good fit for me today. But if you locked your reality into the experience machine, you wouldn't be able to change it.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Another plausible argument against hedonism is that if we are motivated by pleasures and pains, our virtues are also regulated by what we find pleasurable or painful which does not seem sound (Cicero). For example, this would indicate that we value friendship as a virtue because it gives us…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ideology of hedonism implies that the only true intrinsic value that exists for man is the mental state of pleasure. Everything else can only contain extrinsic value which can influence our intrinsic value. For example, eating an ice cream cone has an extrinsic value which leads to a person getting pleasure and hence have an immediate impact on the intrinsic value. This means that the way a person chooses their actions is which will be the source of the biggest intrinsic happiness and away from any pain being caused to themselves. This further translates to no activities being superior to others and our entire judgement being dependent on the intensity of amount of pleasure…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A free society necessitates the preservation of rights while still granting individuals within the society the freedom to do as they please - as long as their behaviors do not infringe on the rights of others. In free societies, inequality is inevitable. As a result, a governing body may be employed to monitor the scale of inequality and deliberate what must be done to combat major issues that hamper the progress of a nation. On one side of the spectrum, where John Rawls stands, individuals argue that some sort of government intervention is necessary to promote equality so a nation can reach the height of progress. On the other side of the political spectrum, where Robert Nozick stands, people view government intervention as a hindrance to…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Autonomy Vs Hedonism

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What is more important: happiness or reality, morality and autonomy? This question is a thought experiment by the philosopher Robert Nozick in order to refute the philosophy of Ethical Hedonism. This theory says that only happiness is necessary for a good life, and it is also sufficient; we do not need anything else. For hedonists happiness is the only intrinsic value, which means that everything else improves our lives only to the extent that it makes us happy. The term of hedonism, comes from the Greek word “hédoné” which means pleasure.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Nozick argues against Hedonism, and also something he calls the experience machine. Using the experience machine requires you to choose the experiences you wish to have, then you are submerged into a tank with electrolodes attached to your brain. While in the tank you have no idea you are there, and you think all of your pre-chosen experiences are real. So the question is, would I personally plug myself into this experience machine? I would most likely say no, because Nozick makes a point that we want to do things rather than just experience them, and we want to be a certain type of person and not just an indeterminate blob floating in a tank.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nozick’s “Experience Machine” provides a new outlook on life as we know it. The experiment consist of questioning the idea of individuals going inside of a machine and only having pleasurable experiences that s/he would not be able to tell apart from reality. Nozick explains that the subject can either map out an entire lifetime of experiences or periodically leave the machine in order to create a new experience. This would cause a person to give up the life they are living in order to have their mind manipulated by a machine in order to create a new reality for the user. Nozick uses this imaginable experience to question Hedonism.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now, we should understand that it is not simply pleasure that we aim for, but, rather, life in general, and that we would not plug in to the machines because we do not want them living for…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the ideology of Classical Utilitarianism, humans have the moral obligation to choose their actions based off what will result in the most net happiness. Happiness and unhappiness in this ideology is based off subjective experience in terms of emotion and bodily sensation. Therefore, happiness corresponds to a pleasant experience while unhappiness corresponds to an unpleasant experience. Classical Utilitarianism relies on the Greatest Happiness Principle, which states that the right action is the action that produces the greatest net happiness of all available actions. James Rachels introduces three main commitments for this ideology of Classical Utilitarianism: consequentialism, hedonism, and impartiality.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    • Epicurus states that end of all human action is the avoidance of pain and fear. Epicurus wrote, “For we recognize pleasure as the first good innate in us, and from pleasure we begin every act of choice and avoidance, and to pleasure we return again, using the feelings as standard by which we judge every good.” • Epicurus’ view (hedonism) is based on pleasure being the one intrinsically good thing. The opposite is unhappiness or agony, the complete absence of happiness. Many people today use hedonism do describe a life filled with sensual pleasures; however, this is not what Epicurus means when he writes of pleasure.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Sunflower Hedonism

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hedonism is a branch of consequentialism that states that morality of a situation should be determined by the net gain in happiness that that action creates. (Andrew, 1) in this situation is defined as the…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Nozick, a professor of philosophy at Harvard University, argues against the idea of Hedonism: that our sole value is not just to seek pleasure, but also to become a certain sort of person. He uses the idea of an “Experience Machine” to disprove the ideas of Epicurus and other hedonists. Entering the experience machine allows for one to choose their desired experience; plug in, and let life play out as you experience it, but it is not actually you doing these things and growing as a person; you are the one that is “…floating in a tank [as] an indeterminate blob” (Nozick 645). For these reasons, I, as well as Nozick, would presume that most people would choose not to enter the experience machine, and instead live your life and face the obstacles in the world as your true self. Assuming this premise to be true, we can conclude that pleasure is not our sole value, invalidating the ideas of Epicurus.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As for me, if I were asked what the good life is, I would argue that a good life is living in a virtuous manner, having true meaning in life and satisfying all human desires, not just the desire for pleasure, but the desire for purpose as well. Looking at other readings and other’s opinions such as John Stuart Mill’s theory of utilitarianism and the theory of virtue ethics, I have been reassured that it is possible to live a good and happy life primarily through the aspects of virtue and…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays