Classical Utilitarianism Analysis

Improved Essays
According to the ideology of Classical Utilitarianism, humans have the moral obligation to choose their actions based off what will result in the most net happiness. Happiness and unhappiness in this ideology is based off subjective experience in terms of emotion and bodily sensation. Therefore, happiness corresponds to a pleasant experience while unhappiness corresponds to an unpleasant experience. Classical Utilitarianism relies on the Greatest Happiness Principle, which states that the right action is the action that produces the greatest net happiness of all available actions. James Rachels introduces three main commitments for this ideology of Classical Utilitarianism: consequentialism, hedonism, and impartiality.
The goal of the first
…show more content…
This means that for an action to be considered good (causing happiness) or bad (causing unhappiness) it must have some sort of consequence which will result in happiness or unhappiness. According to hedonism the right action is the action that will result in the greatest net happiness of all available actions. Hedonism also establishes that net happiness is equal to net value, which is total happiness minus total unhappiness.
The third commitment of Classical Utilitarianism is impartiality, which states that everyone’s interests matter equally. Someone’s interests are things that will make their lives better. Impartiality applies to your own interests as well, meaning that your own interests should not have a greater weight than anyone else’s. Other implications of impartiality include the insinuation that your family of friends’ interests do not matter more than anyone else’s and that the interests of people who belong to one group do not matter more than the interests of individuals who belong to a different
…show more content…
Take, for example, the action of donating money to charity: the more money you donate, the more happiness that will result for those in need. Therefore, you should donate the most amount of money you can to meet the highest net value possible. Technically, according to the ideology of Classical Utilitarianism, the right action is to donate all the money you have to charity. Although this is not in your interests, it is the best interest for the people being helped by the charity you are donating to. Because impartiality means that your own interests should not outweigh those of others when making choices, it would be morally wrong for you to not donate all your money to charity when given the chance. It is not reasonable for a person to donate all of their money to charity for the greater good of others, because they would then not be able to support themselves and will potentially end up dependent on the charity of others as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The theory of Utilitarianism is very vulnerable to criticism due to its reliance on vague underlying principles that leave many questions unanswered. The Utilitarianism ideology is grounded in three simple propositions. First off, actions are solely deemed right if they result in the best consequences. Secondly, the only way consequences are assessed are by how much happiness and unhappiness they cause.…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It does not rely on a higher power to determine what right or wrong but rather it relies on actual outcomes is. Utilitarianism also opposes egoism, or the pursuit of self-interest. Utilitarianism says that one should not consider just one’s self when…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is a branch of metaethics that focuses on the ideas of consequences, self interest, and unbiasedness. Instead of determining if an action is moral through the immediate effects, Utilitarianism skimps over the short term and instead focuses on the long term effects of actions. Actions are no longer based on intention but, rather the overall effects from those actions determines if the parent event was morally good or bad. Utilitarianism also emphasizes the idea that an individual’s well being trumps all moral responsibilities, if a person has to steal food to eat then by utilitarianist standards this person is being morally correct despite his obvious theft. This is advantage to the ideology as it allows for a greater sense of…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is an approach to ethics that states that utility, also known as happiness, is inherently desirable. It examines the consequences of actions rather than the act itself, and maintains…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Theory Of Utilitarianism. The moral theory of Utilitarianism is defined as to be that an action is only good only if it brings happiness to others. There are three sub principles that define the theory of Utilitarianism, Principle one talks about how consequences are all that matter in a situation or an action, that the final outcome/ results are those that matter. The second principle states that happiness is the only thing that matters and that we seek for pleasure more often and we hate to have pain.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People who are mentally ill and commit crimes are able to get therapy rather than be punished. There are multiple ideologies that argue whether or not therapy should be an option. For example, the idea of Utilitarianism is to promote the greatest amount of happiness possible. In this essay, I will be arguing that Utilitarianism supports the idea of therapy because it brings greater happiness for the many, it allows society to help those who refused to be helped, and there is no “right” and “wrong” in treating those who don’t want to be treated. Utilitarianism’s main focus is to do whatever brings about the most happiness and do least of whatever brings unhappiness.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within my paper I plan to explain and criticize the moral theory of act utilitarianism. In the history of utilitarianism John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) was an important philosopher who in the 19th century was an important defender of personal liberty. When it comes Mills theories he has made a major impact on philosophical work and also an impact when it comes too things economically, politically, and socially. Mill defines utilitarianism as a theory that is based on the principle that "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness." (43, Mills).…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stwet Mill and Immanuel Kant are two of the most influential philosophers in history. Their schools of philosophies utilitarianism and deontology, respectively, have fundamentally different priorities and values. Utilitarianism believes that the fundamental principle that all people should follow is the promotion of happiness and pleasure, since actions are morally correct in proportion to how much happiness they create. Happiness, Mill states, is the end objective of all human actions, after all.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He states that "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness" (Mill). According to his words, utilitarianism as a theory is based on the principle of happiness. He calls this the “greatest happiness principle.” He claims that people usually seek pleasure and reject pain. In other words,…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism Utilitarianism principles support the idea that decisions must be based on what will benefit the largest number of people. Each person’s actions are added to the overall utility of the community impacted by those actions. Utilitarianism is focus on the net result of their actions instead of the means or motives that generated the reason for their actions. It is doing by intrinsic rewards which the personal satisfaction from benefiting others.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered as one of the most prominent philosophical concepts. This model's core perspective emphasizes that actions are ethically acceptable or unacceptable depending on their consequences. Based on this understanding, it can be argued that utilitarians hold that the goal of morality is to improve life by enhancing some favorable things such as happiness in the world while minimizing undesirable aspects such as grief (Urmson, 33). Consequently, the core objective of this essay is to define and critique both Act and Rule Utilitarianism, as well as determine the most practical kind of utilitarianism.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rule Utilitarianism

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stealing to survive How would a utilitarian respond to the dilemma of stealing to survive? Utilitarianism is a normative theory and a teleological approach to morality. The theory states that motives do not matter and that the consequences are the only thing that should make you carry out an act. The foundation of utilitarianism is the Greatest Happiness Principle which has three sections.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Utilitarianism,” John Stuart Mill argues that consequences of an action are all that really matter. Defining utilitarianism at its core, is a theory holding that the moral rightness and/or wrongness of an action depends entirely on the consequences of that action. Thereby agreeing that an action or decision is considered good if it generates happiness and bad if it generates the reverse. In his ethical approach, Mill suggests that the measure of success and happiness depends on how many people and how much happiness was developed as a result of that action, or the “greatest happiness principle.” This principle, Mill declares, “holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Utilitarian and Deontological Discussion of Abortion Today, abortion has become a heavily debated topic whether socially or politically since the medical procedure was voted legal by the Supreme Court over 40 years ago. It is defined as the purposeful termination of a pregnancy before a normal childbirth (Abortion: Get Facts About the Procedure and Statistics). Whether you find yourself agreeing with it or not, many people have something to say. Abortion is very controversial because of the discussion whether or not a fetus is a person. Many wonder if there is a morally relevant point at some duration throughout the pregnancy or development of the fetus that could justify having an abortion or possibly not having an abortion.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays