Right To Die

Improved Essays
Should the right to die be an option for those who are terminal? There gets to be a certain point when even the toughest pain meds and strongest drugs just do not cut it. In rare cases like these, do individuals have the autonomy to make the decision to end one’s life?

The right to die is a moral principle that is based on beliefs that one has the right to undergo a voluntary euthanasia. Now many would argue that the right to die only harms one’s self, or would fall under an Ulitarian attitude. However, suicide has long term effects on those around you, such as friends, family, spouse or children. But watching a person deteriorate because of a sickness could do synonymous damage.

As an individual the impact is quite simple; they have the
…show more content…
In Oregon, she decided that this would be the best decision for her family and her. She used her illness and the media to get funding in the support or legalizing the Death with Dignity law in the states that it was currently still illegal in. Brittany Maynard said “I’m choosing to suffer less. To put myself and my family through less pain.”(Caplan.)

The argument asks if this is truly ethical. This permits doctor to assist the terminally ill to die on their own terms and some say that we should not be the ones determining that. “God should do so.” When we allow assisted suicides, we set up the poor and disabled to eventually be abused. In Brittany Maynard’s case, she knew she was dying. That was inevitable. But Maynard was fully aware, along with her family that she would die after taking the lethal pills.

A way that might be beneficial in the decision of assisting in suicide would be to have a panel of doctors and psychologists determine that the patient’s decision is 100% the right choice. That way when the patient does decide his or her fate, there are experts and evidence that this is the only way for them to discontinue the suffering. As far as the truth to all this, well that’s quite simple. The truth is regardless of politics, Brittany is not suffering anymore. Whether right or wrong, she was able to make that decision and since her death, man others now

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In order to save money on medical research it could also lead to increased medical killings. No one can know without a doubt when someone will die, doctors play the role of God by giving an estimated time frame when an ill person will die. When someone is given an estimated time to live they become gloomy and lose their zeal for life. By agreeing with physician-assisted suicide for patients in pain, and/or little time to live, we are saying it is okay to commit suicide if you’re hurting. Pain can come in the form of physical or emotional, and who’s to say where we draw the line?…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agreeing to the process of PAS, shows terminally ill patients their live is not worth living. PAS communicates to the vulnerable, that by poor example, other patients will choose death as a benefit, over life that has become miserable to them. Physicians should not give up completely on the patient if their is no possible cure. The patient should die naturally with emotional support, be provided with a sufficient amount of pain control and keep a well communicated relationship with their physician and family. Advocates of Physician-assisted suicide propose that mercy killing is required because patients with a terminal illness, undergo unmanageable suffering.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Assisted Suicide Ethical? Physician-assisted suicide, also known as euthanasia or mercy killing is the act intentionally inducing a painless and quick death to patients who suffer from serious forms of diseases or patients in a permanent coma (Sjöstrand). Normally, it is carried out by a doctor or a nurse. Euthanasia has raised a lot of controversies all over the world and the main argument is based on whether causing a painless death is ethical. The advocates of euthanasia claim that it is ethical to perform euthanasia on terminally ill patients since it is a solution to patients who are hopeless and in great pain.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros Of Euthanasia

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Euthanasia… is simply to be able to die with dignity at a moment when life is devoid of it.” (Mannes 74) Euthanasia is the voluntary or involuntary act of physician-assisted suicide to incurable terminally ill patients. The primary use of Euthanasia is to end one’s persistent suffering by injecting a lethal amount of substances into the patient. According to “A General History of Euthanasia” the origin of the word comes from the Greek meaning “Good Death” or “Gentle and Easy Death”. It is a method used among several countries but is also banned in others. There are many opinions on this topic and others seem to think either one way or the other.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “An assisted dying law would not result in more people dying, but in fewer people living.” This quote by Richard Branson shows the reasons behind assisted suicide. Assisted suicide is an option in certain places that allows patients that are suffering to end their pain through a physicians assisted death. When people have to make an end of life decision, one must take into account the patients suffering, the patient's quality of life and how much the family suffers while making the decision. The patients should be allowed to have a physicians assisted suicide because of how much the patient suffers. They undergoes physical, emotional, and psychological pain during treatments.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dignity Vs Euthanasia

    • 2009 Words
    • 8 Pages

    With many controversies with it, it may never be fully legal in the world. The terminally ill go through so much pain that it should be allowed for them, only, to end their lives. The loss of dignity is not worth what family members to go through and may bring more sorrow to them having assisted suicide. Just imagining being in the shoes of a terminally ill person it would be hard to know that the time is coming to die. As doctors are making better medicine hopefully these deadly diseases go away, but until then it should be a right to the patients to end it on their terms.…

    • 2009 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If a patient decides that they would like to die, that is their choice and they should be allowed to do so with their wishes. Suicide is not illegal, and allows people to kill themselves, but what if you want to die but are unable to preform the suicide yourself and need assistance. When given a survey, 80% of people in the public said that they wanted the law to change to allow doctors to assist with death when patients are terminally ill. My…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After all, the ultimate motive is to aid in dying painlessly and peacefully. In this way, autonomy involving life and death decisions are maintained. Now, those who oppose voluntary euthanasia consider this choice unethical and label it as homicide. These opponents might insist upon other options such as rehabilitation and palliative care centers as alternatives to assist dying patients. Lastly, they claim that it is difficult to tell if assisted suicide is voluntary or insisted by others because those that are ill might feel as if they are burdening their caretakers ("Asia Pacific Economics Blog").…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pas Vs Euthanasia

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main discrepancy is that Euthanasia involves the physician intentionally ending the life of his or her patient. These acts are considered a “mercy-killing” with the intent to act as a means of compassion; to end ones suffering. Oppositely, with Euthanasia the patient does not necessarily provide the consent to the third party to perform the “last act”. There are two types of Euthanasia: Voluntary active and Non-voluntary active. Voluntary active euthanasia involves the patient’s explicit request and informed consent for intentional administering of medication or other intervention to cause death.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “Right to Die” is this a choice or is this a choice that society should be allowed to make? The controversy over someone choosing to end their life when dealing with a terminal illness with a physician’s help is the rights of the patient and not the right of society to choose. People who are dealing with terminal illness should have a choice to die or not with their doctor’s help. In a physician-assistant suicide the doctor prescribes the medication that will end a patient’s life, but the patient has to be able to take the medication which will result in death. Euthanasia is when the doctor gives the patient the medication, which will end the patient’s life.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays