The journey of science has come a long way in analyzing how knowledge developed over thousands of years and continue to expands its boundaries. It changed the perspective of life and defined roles in the society. All the literatures that were written and the scientific experiments through observations and performance have proven to expand the cultural beliefs of enlightenment and changed how humanity should be define by. Some of these contributions that influenced the approach of life include subject matters, reasoning, and society practices. As scientists began to move beyond the ancients to discovered an integrated body of knowledge during the Scientific Revolution period, the role of mathematics, physics, and our understanding of life
…show more content…
Christians and Catholics would say that God is the truth to everything. God is the reason to their existence. All events are planned by God before birth and are each individual’s faiths. Every event that each individual comes across with is somehow connected to God and beyond the reach for humanity to predict. A scholar named Rene Descartes explained that there is a difference between the mind and body in how they function and gather information. In his Discourse on Method book, Rene Decartes questioned all facts that he learned from others and decided to erase all of his knowledge, besides ones he analyzed himself, to discover that his and God’s existences are the true forms of beings. Throughout his journey in analyzing science through his senses, he came to a conclusion where he listed the four most important approaches in observing information: 1) never to accept anything as true that were not plainly known, 2) divide each of the difficulties into as may parts as possible to better resolve them, 3) to conduct thoughts in an orderly fashion from simplest to the most composite ideas (Descartes, pg 11). He learned that our senses does not helped us in understanding information, but the mind does because it is a powerful organ that enables the ability to think and process information. Another philosopher was Margaret Lucas Cavendish who also believed that the body and mind works separately in terms of expressing reasons and understanding the world we live in. The different in the argument is that Cavendish believed that the mind itself is a powerful machine that works corrosively well with reasons through speech and words. It gather thoughts and ideas together to build connections between collected data and theories. In terms of the different parts of the human’s body, each parts “hath its sense and reason” (Burton and Dworkin, pg 46) without gaining any knowledge. Cavendish argues that “reason is the
Christians and Catholics would say that God is the truth to everything. God is the reason to their existence. All events are planned by God before birth and are each individual’s faiths. Every event that each individual comes across with is somehow connected to God and beyond the reach for humanity to predict. A scholar named Rene Descartes explained that there is a difference between the mind and body in how they function and gather information. In his Discourse on Method book, Rene Decartes questioned all facts that he learned from others and decided to erase all of his knowledge, besides ones he analyzed himself, to discover that his and God’s existences are the true forms of beings. Throughout his journey in analyzing science through his senses, he came to a conclusion where he listed the four most important approaches in observing information: 1) never to accept anything as true that were not plainly known, 2) divide each of the difficulties into as may parts as possible to better resolve them, 3) to conduct thoughts in an orderly fashion from simplest to the most composite ideas (Descartes, pg 11). He learned that our senses does not helped us in understanding information, but the mind does because it is a powerful organ that enables the ability to think and process information. Another philosopher was Margaret Lucas Cavendish who also believed that the body and mind works separately in terms of expressing reasons and understanding the world we live in. The different in the argument is that Cavendish believed that the mind itself is a powerful machine that works corrosively well with reasons through speech and words. It gather thoughts and ideas together to build connections between collected data and theories. In terms of the different parts of the human’s body, each parts “hath its sense and reason” (Burton and Dworkin, pg 46) without gaining any knowledge. Cavendish argues that “reason is the