Descartes Rationalism Research Paper

Improved Essays
Rationalism was a philosophical movement that took place in the 17th century and was associated with the idea of mathematical reasoning. Many philosophers at that time, including Descartes, Leibniz and Spinoza, had beliefs that intellectual and deductive reasoning was the source of knowledge.
Rationalism is sometimes compared with Empiricism, Locke’s philosophy that knowledge is gained by experience. However, the distinction between the two is perhaps not as clear-cut as is sometimes made out to be. Rationalists attested that, on a basic level, all knowledge, including scientific knowledge, could be utilized through reason alone.
Rationalism is made out to be the truth in all doubt. René Descartes was a famous rationalist from the 17th

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    IHUM 202 Name¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬_______________Nhi Tran__________________ Reading Questions A Discourse on Method 1. As he meditates on and develops his method for finding scientific truths, Descartes debates whether he should sweep away old notions (existing knowledge and philosophies) or build upon them. Which option does he reason is the most effective for him and why?…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes attempts to reconcile a Christian metaphysics with a new epistemology contrary to the scholastic, Aristotelian worldview. He seeks new foundations that knowledge can be built upon and tries to accomplish this by identifying basic, indubitable axioms to derive more complex truths by. As Descartes had a background in mathematics and geometry, these tenets are proposed alike mathematical truths in that they are self-evidential. He calls these axioms ,”clear and distinct perceptions”. For the Cartesian epistemology and metaphysics to be plausible, these perceptions must be not only epistemologically privileged, but also universal and justifiable as mathematical truths are, in terms of semantics and self-evidentiality.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes’ statement, “I at least know for certain that nothing is certain” perfectly illustrates the multiple problems that arise when all rational beings realize that their senses can deceive them and that the very foundation of their knowledge is based on the assumption that everything they encounter is real. Thankfully, being aware of the problem is the first step in solving it. The juxtaposition of Rene Descartes and William Shakespeare reveals a difference of opinion when they set out to examine and solve the problems that arise from the doubtfulness of the knowledge provided by our senses. Although both authors agree on the importance of solitude and the potential problem of an evil genius manipulating our senses, Descartes’ use…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bernard Williams created an experiment to question people about utilitarianism, to be for or against it. Jim finds himself in the central square of a small South American town where he has to make a strange decision. There are twenty Indians who caused some trouble in the town and since Jim is a visitor the captain has him decide the fate. He has the option of killing one and letting the others live or refusing and then they all will die. There’s no way to save myself and them all so he has to make a decision (JJC Smart and Bernard Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against, 1973).…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Max Weber’s key concept was rationalization. This refers to the eradication of mystery and emotion from everyday life and their replacement by rational calculation and control. This essay will discuss Weber’s contribution towards sociology in terms of rationalization and his attribution to ‘The Protestant Ethic’. It will introduce Weber’s key approaches, such as social theory, rationalization in regards to modern society, bureaucracy, the ideal type and a contemporary example of rationalization. Furthermore, capitalism will be discussed, in order to depict Weber’s theories in comparison to Marx’s.…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Reality, a state of the world for what things truly are and as they truly exist. Reality has perplexed philosophers to an extent, but perhaps none more so than the maddening words of Descartes in his meditations. To say that his words are maddening is a bit ingenuous to Descartes, but what he does propose is out of place. There have been skeptics before Descartes, but the level of skepticism he reaches is quite absurd and even more, it would be absurd if it was even true and could not be refuted in any argument. To begin with Descartes’ evil genius, there will be two vital topics of discussion, doubt, and certainty.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Skeptics Inception In Descartes Skepticism he excises the idea of doubt and the never ending allurement to some sort of doubt that is within life. Descartes says that everything you know no matter how probable or improbable it is has doubt. In Descartes meditation one and two he goes over his three main points of doubt. First, he wonders if he may be crazy, secondly if he is dreaming and thirdly if he is being tricked.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In part four of Descartes’ Discourse on Method, the word ‘perfect’ is used numerous times. The excessive use of the word marks its importance in Descartes argument. This part of Descartes work contains Descartes’ thoughts on God and proof of God’s existence. He is exploring the idea of a perfect being, but the word ‘perfect’ seems to take on different meanings throughout the section of Descartes deliberating on what makes a perfect being. Perfect is used in relation to doubt, in relation to God, and in relation to truth.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Taylor Adair Professor Derek Green Philosophy 101 16 October, 2015 Defeating Epistemic Skepticism In the Meditations, René Descartes starts by doubting the truth in everything he has ever known in order to defeat epistemic skepticism, which is the theory that human subjects cannot achieve knowledge. For him to be successful in doing so, Descartes attempts to go back on the foundation on which all his former beliefs rested. He touches on various possibilities in his method of doubt which seem to contribute to the idea that humans can’t in fact achieve knowledge.…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For example, something which we perceive with our eyes must be rationalised by our thoughts. His famous dictum, cogito ergo sum, is a conclusion reached as obvious and necessary, not inferred from experience. This was, for Descartes, an irrefutable principle upon which to ground all forms of other knowledge. For us to accept and understand “knowledge” we must first accept our own existence. The absoluteness of certainty required for something to be regarded as a truth suggests that it should be beyond any sliver of a doubt.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cartesian Dualism, a theory coined by Rene Descartes and examined within his sixth mediation of Meditations of First Philosophy, explains and theorizes the idea of the mind and body as two distinct substances. The theory states that the mind is not merely a physical brain as another organ of the body, but rather the non-materialistic mind and material body are two different entities. The body, having elements of extension have a reality with spatial relevance as it entails form, texture, location and weight. In comparison, the mind has non-spatial components that consist of humans’ realm of thought as it includes consciousness, images, emotions beliefs and desires. Cartesian Dualism presents many simple and seemingly rational arguments such…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That experience determines our idea of that particular thing. René Descartes was a Rationalist, which is someone who believes in…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In other words, people are drawn toward pleasure and flee from pain. Rationalism emphasizes that there are universal truths that are…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taking an example to show this, we cannot solve a Math problem just by the laws provided to us, there is a proper method in which we have to approach a problem to get to the solution and it can be understood only when we have seen or observed the proper method before hand. But it is important for us to learn about both Empiricism and Rationalism as these are the two extremeties of the propositions of how we gain knowledge and they allow us to check for ourselves that what fits in the situations we face…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays