He thinks that Christianity has nothing but revere for the environment and blames the problems on people and their cultures. He states “throwaway culture which affects the excluded just as it quickly reduces things to rubbish” The point he brings up is problematic in the way that nothing is seen as important anymore. If nothing that we produce is important how can people view the world as important. So he’s suggesting that a cause of environmental problems that could be attributed to Christianity should be attributed to people because “other living beings have value of their own in God’s eyes.” But the values that are at the heart of Christianity obviously are not getting through to the people. If the values were then people would use the Bible as evidence of become ecologically responsible, kind how the Pope feels. This is not the case because there are many interpretations of the Bible, such as earth has a temporary home, that can cause people to see the environment as not as
He thinks that Christianity has nothing but revere for the environment and blames the problems on people and their cultures. He states “throwaway culture which affects the excluded just as it quickly reduces things to rubbish” The point he brings up is problematic in the way that nothing is seen as important anymore. If nothing that we produce is important how can people view the world as important. So he’s suggesting that a cause of environmental problems that could be attributed to Christianity should be attributed to people because “other living beings have value of their own in God’s eyes.” But the values that are at the heart of Christianity obviously are not getting through to the people. If the values were then people would use the Bible as evidence of become ecologically responsible, kind how the Pope feels. This is not the case because there are many interpretations of the Bible, such as earth has a temporary home, that can cause people to see the environment as not as