This is seemingly as revolutionary as economists challenging principles of micro and macroeconomics in mainstream economics. Wendell Berry states that though he senses bringing religion into the conversation is a risky approach, “our present problems demand that we have recourse to our cultural heritage including a concern with religion which at the minimum shatters the selfish context of the individual life, and thus forces a consideration of what human beings are and ought to be.47” Taylor and Grinlinton posit that we cannot avoid philosophical and theological inquiry into the ultimate end just because it is difficult and they invoke a “new politics of obligation” which will depend upon human society consciously choosing a new social goal, and if it chooses the
This is seemingly as revolutionary as economists challenging principles of micro and macroeconomics in mainstream economics. Wendell Berry states that though he senses bringing religion into the conversation is a risky approach, “our present problems demand that we have recourse to our cultural heritage including a concern with religion which at the minimum shatters the selfish context of the individual life, and thus forces a consideration of what human beings are and ought to be.47” Taylor and Grinlinton posit that we cannot avoid philosophical and theological inquiry into the ultimate end just because it is difficult and they invoke a “new politics of obligation” which will depend upon human society consciously choosing a new social goal, and if it chooses the